User talk:Mohammedjaseem66

Edit warring
You have also been edit warring across various articles, including Narendra Modi. While awaiting expiry of your block, you should take time to familiarise yourself with WP:EW, WP:3RR, WP:BRD and WP:DR. In addition, I think you need to be aware of the information in the following notice. - Sitush (talk) 17:17, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
 General Ization Talk  17:23, 6 February 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 18:03, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Unblock
This account --Neil N  talk to me 17:14, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

You Are a Cheater you created a fake wiki account with minor username changes and created fake special contribution, i am ashamed about your acts Mohammedjaseem66 (talk) 17:20, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Are you saying that is not your account? --Neil N  talk to me 17:23, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

My account username is mohammedjaseem66 not Mohammedjasemen66, i don't know why you created the fake page Mohammedjaseem66 (talk) 17:26, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Your block is now indefinite per the checkuser findings in Sockpuppet investigations/Mohammedjaseem66. --Neil N  talk to me 19:01, 6 February 2018 (UTC)


 * What is your connection to and ?  Vanjagenije   (talk)  08:06, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

They are my family members Mohammedjaseem66 (talk) 08:55, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

They were sharing the same IP address, obviously, but I don't see any kind of abuse here. There is no overlap in editing, nothing WP:ILLEGIT as far as I can see. Is there really need to block this account indefinitely?  Vanjagenije  (talk)  12:50, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes. Although the details are not specified, the other accounts are blocked as violations of WP:SOCK. I believe that to mean those other accounts are believed to be evading a block on another, third unspecified, account. If that isn't the case, and if there's no overlap in editing, this would be an acceptable use of WP:SOCK. --Yamla (talk) 16:17, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, per Yamla. Also this won't work (I didn't get a notification). --Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 16:27, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Please see this. --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 16:30, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * In thar diff, was talking about the other two accounts (Abdulazeez123 and Ashjatkp10), not about this user. And, also, what does it mean "edits do suggest past abuse, I just can't point to a possible sockmaster right away"? Is that evidence of socking? How do those edits "suggest past abuse"? I don't understand all this. We have three accounts that share the same IP, but have no overlap in editing, no abuse, nothing. We are blocking all three because two of them suggest past abuse, although we don't know how and which abuse. Do you really think that is correct rationale for indefinite block?  Vanjagenije   (talk)  20:06, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I changed my mind, see the section below.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  18:55, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I concur that it is probably safe and reasonable to unblock this user. Cheers, -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:09, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Now we have the copyvio and possibly lying to deal with. I'm out. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
 * There is no overlap between the 3 accounts, so feel free to unblock Mohammedjaseem66, if you are comfortable with them creating 1 and 2 on their 1st day. Never mind Abdulazeez123 and Ashjatkp10, they have very short editing history. Materialscientist (talk) 07:48, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Discussion
On your (now deleted) user page, you claimed that you made over 100,000 contributions to Wikipedia and also that you are a recent changes patroller. Can you explain that?  Vanjagenije  (talk)  09:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah, now I see. It seams that you copy-pasted content from User:BD2412. You even copied top icon that claimed you are administrator. Why did you do all that?  Vanjagenije  (talk)  09:41, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Oh Sorry for that i wasn't familiar with the user talk page and templates at that time, I will not repeat any mistake on Wikipedia anymore Mohammedjaseem66 (talk) 10:51, 8 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes, Requests for adminship/Waacstats is a puzzler. It's even more puzzling knowing we have a user by that name. I'd like to know more about it. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:51, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

What exactly are you going to do here? In addition to the above, during your short editing career, you've:
 * Tried to nominate a featured article for good article status multiple times and only stopped when warned you would be blocked
 * Done an incorrect page move
 * Created a redirect against WP:RFFL
 * Uploaded copyrighted images without any indication you had permission from the copyright owner.

While some mistakes are expected from new editors, what are you doing on your part to limit these mistakes? --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 15:09, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

I think Mistakes are a part of being human, but i will give you assurance that i will not commit any mistakes on Wikipedia. I will read the Wikipedia rules and project pages more often.I understand what i am blocked for, i will not do it again, and i will make productive contributions to Wikipedia Mohammedjaseem66 (talk) 15:22, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Hey! I'm still looking for an explanation on your (re)creation of Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Waacstats. I'm sure that was a mistake, but I would like a full explanation as to how you came to make that mistake. As to making mistakes, you cannot say you will not make them. We all do. Another mistake would be skirting the Waacstats issue after I and others lobbied to unblock you. Once again, the issue is WP:sock, and the possibility you are a banned or blocked user evading your ban or block. If that is the case, you need to stop editing, now. Wait 6 months w/o editing or socking, then request the standard offer on your original account. Thanks.  -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:10, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
 * May I also point out that all indications are that this editor repeatedly lied to justify their persistent insertions of a copyrighted image, as and on the Talk page of the now deleted image. The information uncovered since then concerning how the account and IP are being used make the editor's claims dubious, if not obviously false. Lying to other editors here is not a "mistake"; it is a deliberate act. <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:140;"> General Ization  <i style="color: #000666;">Talk </i> 17:15, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Goodbye from Wikipedia :) Mohammedjaseem66 (talk) 05:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
 * You are not allowed to remove declined unblock requests while the block is active, see WP:BLANKING.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  09:12, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rosapoo film poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Rosapoo film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 20 February 2018 (UTC)