User talk:Mohanazadeh25

December 2016
Hello, I'm Sandgem Addict. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of legendary creatures in Hindu mythology without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. sandgemADDICT yeah? 12:52, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into List of legendary creatures in Hindu mythology. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:32, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at as an example of how it is done. Please leave a message on my talk page if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to List of legendary creatures in Hindu mythology— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GorillaWarfare (talk) 04:16, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 10:57, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Ugog Nizdast (talk) 08:16, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Surat, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Sourcing vs decorating
Hello. I noticed you recently spent a considerable energy in contributing to lists of twin towns and cities. Sometimes by adding new entries without providing any source: I have erased these. Sometimes by decorating existing unsourced entries with flags: I must remind you that if these entries remain unsourced they will sooner or later be erased, and that thus all your efforts will have been vain. Sapphorain (talk) 22:40, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of wars involving India. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Adamgerber80 (talk) 12:36, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

January 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of wars involving India, you may be blocked from editing. Adamgerber80 (talk) 08:44, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.