User talk:Mohasik

Speedy deletion declined: Love Jihad
Hello Mohasik, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Love Jihad, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: It is an alleged activity not a hoax. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Tikiwont (talk) 19:13, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for sock puppetry or meat puppetry. You reinserted the same deletion request today that yesterday had been decline to User:Asik5678. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tikiwont (talk) 19:53, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Office network

 * Blocking admins' comment: I had fixed your unblock requests as they were unfortunately invisible due to an error of mine with the template. As pointed out above neither of the two request addresses the reason for blocking. Actually I have to note that also User:Asik5678 used the autoblock template incorrectly.... Rather it seems to me that you have been evading the block with the IP you mention above, also self-identifying as 94.57.172.139 and possibly other IPs active at Hindu jihad and Love Jihad. I'll also block the two obvious IPs, with the hidden unblock requests and your article being at AfD the reason for not proposing an extension of the original block. But any further intentional block evasion will not only result in the Ips being blocked but result in extension of your block at User:Asik5678as well. --Tikiwont (talk) 17:37, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

request for unblock

 * Let me add that the account User:Asik5678 is blocked for two weeks only, that is till October 16. So either you come up with a more convincing unblock rationale, preferably at User talk:Asik5678, or you will have to wait for that block to expire to prove that you can contribute constructively without disruption. --Tikiwont (talk) 13:08, 6 October 2010 (UTC)