User talk:Mohsenaghaloo

April 2017
Hello, Mohsenaghaloo. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:06, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. For example, describing someone as a "trailblazer" and a "genius" is not neutral reporting. Also, please note that information about ordinary people of no significance or notability does not belong in Wikipedia, and content should be referenced to reliable published sources, both to make the information verifiable and as evidence of notability. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:12, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Germi, you may be blocked from editing. Also, do not add content, especially about any living person, without providing reliable sources to support the content. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:01, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Sabzevar university of medical sciences, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. L3X1 (distant write)  02:42, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Regarding your contributions at the Administrator Noticeboard. Suggestion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. L3X1 (distant write)  02:49, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Beeblebrox (talk) 04:01, 8 April 2017 (UTC)