User talk:Moinulshdu

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew B Greytak (December 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 78.26 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andrew B Greytak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Andrew B Greytak, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Andrew_B_Greytak Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:78.26&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Andrew_B_Greytak reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:00, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Andrew B Greytak has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, as follows:

Actually, The relevant standard is not whether there are third party sources to meet GNG. The relevant standard is WP:PROF., and that is normally met by showing the person to be influential in their subject as demonstrated by citations to their work. . He is on fact notable, as Google Scholar shows.

Give the 5 or so most cited peer-reviewed articles, given in full with coauthors, full name of journals, and links, with the number of citations to each of them from Google Scholar of Scopus or ISI; any national level awards--(not junior awards or awards from their own university) Add major national-level outside positions, such as president of the major national organizations, and any positions of editor-in-chief ; Membership or minor offices in most societies, and service on editorial boards, do not count for much & are better omitted.

Rewrite the research section in your own words; it is presently   too close a paraphrase from   the sources. When you do that, also remove all the present wordiness, which looks promotional. For example "Through his research, he tries to understand the underlying properties of semiconductor nanostructures and how these properties can be modified by controlling the chemistry at their surface." should be " He works on the underlying..." DGG ( talk ) 22:33, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Andrew B Greytak
Hello, Moinulshdu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Andrew B Greytak, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:25, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Andrew B Greytak


Hello, Moinulshdu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Andrew B Greytak".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:56, 2 July 2022 (UTC)