User talk:Moisejp/Archive 7

Your GA nomination of The Amps
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Amps you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Viriditas -- 06:10, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Amps
The article The Amps you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Amps for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Viriditas -- 11:30, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Amps
The article The Amps you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Amps for comments about the article. Well done! Viriditas (talk) 20:11, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

I'm Not There
Hi Moisejp, Good to hear from you, and I've noticed you're still doing good constructive editing & writing. I'm well and hope you are too. I've been re-writing I'm Not There since 2009, it's a sort of hobby. I made some shortening following your suggestions, but I liked the link of Robbie & Claire to the cover of Freewheelin' because many critics have said Claire is based on Sara Dylan, and I think it's good to point out she's a mix of Sara and Suze. I've down loaded Haynes' Production Notes which have a lot of info and also have the script of I'm Not There which was published online in 2007. We can use these for references if needed. Why don't you do some editing, as you mention, and I'll say if I prefer to keep it. Look forward to catching up with you in future. Best, Mick gold (talk) 14:17, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Feedback for the Hovercards Beta Feature
Hi Moisejp, We are collecting feedback for a new beta feature called 'Hovercards' - https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Beta_Features/Hovercards. Beta features can be turned on using the tab in the top right. It would be great if you could turn the feature on and give us your feedback on the discussion page. Thanks Vibhabamba (talk) 10:11, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Bob Dylan Legacy
Hi Moisejp, please contribute your thoughts to this discussion. Thanx Mick gold (talk) 15:42, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Notes at WP:GAN
reverted the notes that you left at WP:GAN. You must use the note parameter on the article talk pages.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:33, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Like a Rolling Stone - In the news
Hi Moisejp, Thanks for supporting this item about the auction price record for a popular music manuscript. I read the news today, oh boy Mick gold (talk) 07:11, 29 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Good to hear from you & thanks for your comments on BDB. I've also been working on the Final Solution and am experiencing some strange contributions from another editor, Edithshaked, take a look. Hope that all is well with you & best wishes Mick gold (talk) 05:32, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Paul Conrad article
Hi Moisejp,

I see that you are "reviewing", if that's the right term, and copy editing the Paul Conrad article, which is much appreciated. I am trying to do some minor copy editing as well. It seems that the article could use quite abit of "improvement" in order to reach a quality level. All, I believe, my edits to date have been reverted by another edit, who I believe has ownership issues with the article. I guess I could just walk away, but I sort of feel like why should I have to walk away? What do you suggest? I am trying to use the talk page, but I feel like my changes aen't really that contentious? Anyhow, its probably me :) Cheers, --Malerooster (talk) 14:17, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of This Side of Love
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article This Side of Love you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 3 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. InThe AM 14:34, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Hey, I reviewed that article. Unfortunately, it did not pass. You can check out the issues I found at the review page.  InThe AM  16:19, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * OK, InTheAM. Thanks very much for taking the time to review. Cheers, Moisejp (talk) 02:53, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of This Side of Love
The article This Side of Love you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:This Side of Love for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of InTheAM -- InTheAM (talk) 16:25, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

FAC review
Hey there! I see you are active at GAN and have dealt with featured article candidates as well. I currently have a music-related FAC of my own (Hasil Adkins), and I was wondering if you'd be willing to take a look at it. The review page can be found here, where you can post your comments or !vote on the article's quality. Any input would be greatly appreciated! Thank you &mdash;  MusikAnimal talk 17:22, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Son of Three
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Son of Three you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 15:41, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks, very much, J Milburn! I have responded to all of your comments on the article's review page. Moisejp (talk) 19:26, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Son of Three
The article Son of Three you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Son of Three for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 21:03, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Featured article candidates/Trey Burke/archive1
As the Talk:Trey Burke/GA1 reviewer, I was hoping that you might be willing to make some comments at Featured article candidates/Trey Burke/archive1, which is in dire need of discussants.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:06, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Happy Halloween!!!
Cheers! &#34;We could read for-EVER&#59; reading round the wiki!&#34; (talk) 18:13, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Title TK
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Title TK you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sparklism -- Sparklism (talk) 07:20, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi there - nice article. As you can see, I've posted my initial thoughts on the review page. I hope this doesn't come across as too harsh (it's certainly not intended to be), but I think the article needs a bit more depth before it makes GA. I don't know if this can be easily rectified by you in the time it takes to carry out a GA review, but I really hope it can. Looking forward to seeing your thoughts on this. Cheers! :) — sparklism  hey! 09:32, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Title TK
The article Title TK you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Title TK for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sparklism -- Sparklism (talk) 16:43, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Well done buddy, I know it was hard work! Keep it up :) — sparklism hey! 16:54, 2 December 2014 (UTC)