User talk:Moist towelett/Archives/2015/July

Matthew Gordon Banks
Hello. I noticed on the talk page of the above page that you have suggested that I am in some way associated with the subject of the above article, on the basis of three edits in May. I would like you to look at the content of the those edits, as well as my contribution history, and reconsider your opinion. I have nothing to do with the man. I edit articles on former British Army officers. Best, WatermillockCommon (talk) 21:53, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Matthew Gordon Banks
Rhumidian

I see you have been "at it" again. You were determined to have included my being a perpetrator of fraud when I was the victim and now you have remove the last vestiges of my acerr details.

We have reached the point where I email a second time - wondering whether it is better to have the whole page removed.

What you recently removed is accurate. Due to my position people internationally look me up on Wikipedia but since someone devastated my account in March when I stood in local elections Wiki has not replaced what was accurately there before. The Foreign Office hardly advertise their spooks similarly the MoD do not advertise the things i did but I can provide contract of employment and a phone call to tim Farron's office at westminster from "Wikipedia" would confirm my work for Mr Farron. Just look at my bio! For someone who has worked for several Araab government's and just returned from Moscow your editing has been a travesty. It does not end here. I am busy but i am going to deal with this - even if removal is the only option. Strathisla1 is me, Watermillock is a colleague and the Ministry of Food knows what he is talking about.

What is the point of having a biog if there are no career details. This situation is very much your responsibility to date.

Strathisla1Strathisla1 (talk) 22:47, 14 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Strathisla1, may i please inform you that you have violated the rules of wikipedia by creating multiple accounts. This is called Sock puppetry. It is very serious, and is one of the principle rules of editing on wikipedia. Failure to abide by the rules of wikipedia and repeated sock puppetry can result in your ip being banned and you being unable to edit on wikipedia. I may open a case for investigation to see the extent of your sock puppetry.
 * I would also like to inform you that it is also against the rules of wikipedia to edit pages you are associated with in order to self advertise, this is what facebook and linked in are for. I therefore invite you to play no role in any of the editing of your page, as it is up to users such as myself to contribute to your article.
 * As to why i deleted the content, I would invite you to read this.
 * I would also like to ask you if you are making a legal threat against another WP user?
 * Please read through your previous conversations to answer any confusion.
 * Thanks
 * Rhumidian (talk) 09:47, 16 July 2015 (UTC)


 * This discussion started when someone unknown destroyed my Wiki page in March. I find your comments "threatening". There are lots of people at my IP address with different email addresses who who like to see an accurate short biography. You have been consistently determined to prevent that - for some reason. I have no idea what you are talking about when you ask if I an threatening legal action against a colleague. The answer is NO, but at the very least a more senior member of the Wiki editorial staff will need to look at this as I do not think you have been behaving well. You are preventing me working and your threats are not helpful. Unless you become more cooperative and sensible I will have to take action against you. What kind of Editor wants to prevent legitimate information of ones career being placed in the public domain?Strathisla1 (talk) 19:18, 17 July 2015 (UTC)


 * I would like to remind you that i am not threatening you, I believe it is the contrary. I removed the content because it was unsourced and unreliable, Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion, please read the wikipedia rules! The content must also be noteworthy, If it dosent meet the wiki guidelines it will also be removed. The only noteworthy points made in your article(which can be supported by reliable sources) are your early life and your career in politics. If you wish to challenge this then please take it up on the talk page of Matthew Gordon Banks rather than harassing me on my talk page. End of discussion.Rhumidian (talk) 20:14, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

16:51:11, 20 July 2015 review of submission by 5.148.153.2
Can you please advise why this article reads more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia?

5.148.153.2 (talk) 16:51, 20 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi, It is because of non-neutral statements such as "The brand released an interview with Sarah Brown and Bec Astley Clarke about the collaboration. Interview with Sarah Brown and Bec Astley Clarke on YouTube" which make the article seem like an advertisement.Rhumidian (talk) 17:58, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sexual Assault Prevention Response has been accepted
 Sexual Assault Prevention Response, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Rhumidian (talk) 23:49, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Sexual_Assault_Prevention_Response help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Draft:Thomas O'Neill (biologist)
I don't think "lead too long" is an acceptable decline reason if that's literally all you're going to say. If you think the lead or the article contains excessive inappropriate information then say that. The lead being "too long" is otherwise a minor style issue. I'm not sure whether the article is acceptable or declineable so I don't know what to do, but I really think you shouldn't have made a review like that. — Jeraphine (talk) 07:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – UEFA Group D
I wish to inform you that you incorrectly tagged 2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – UEFA Group D as uncategorized. If you edit the page, you will see a category is there, however it does not yet show up on the page. Lucky102 (talk) 18:11, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Strange, I didn't see the edited script. I tried to add stub tags too but they haven't shown up. Possible bug? Any ideas Lucky102? Rhumidian (talk) 18:12, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * It is fixed now however the stub category is wrong as it is not a "club" as such. Rhumidian.
 * OOps, can't find a fifa stub category? Rhumidian (talk) 18:16, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Batu Licin
This article also needs help. It is from the Indonesian Wikipedia and combines the Kingdom of Batulicin and Batu Licin articles. OrganicEarth (talk) 17:12, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Janger
This also needs help. Thanks. OrganicEarth (talk) 17:52, 31 July 2015 (UTC)