User talk:MojGlamoc

Respect for other users
I saw one of your edit summaries on Glamoč was denigrating to another editor. Please try to avoid at all costs attacking other editors in any way. Make the discussions about content, not motivations. Thanks -- Jprg1966  (talk)  16:25, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:34, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Why?

Wikipedia policies
This is not according to the rules of Wikipedia. Please read Talk page guidelines and No personal attacks first, then write on others talk pages. Comparing editors to Nazis is considered to be a personal attack. Ioannes II de Granum (talk) 18:22, 12 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Okay I stop calling him that, but he not stop changing page to inferior and improper status. So what can be done? (MojGlamoc (talk) 20:34, 12 March 2013 (UTC)).


 * I do not know what's the problem now? Content without valid sources has been deleted. Data for population is identical to yours, except they are now even arranged in tables. If you have some constructive suggestions placed them on the talk page, and then if they are suitable they will be included in the article. Best regards, Ioannes II de Granum (talk) 20:58, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
Your recent editing history at Glamoč shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ◅ PRODUCER  ( TALK ) 15:41, 13 March 2013 (UTC)