User talk:Mojoandvoodoo

January 2021
Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Richat Structure that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 17:01, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Just you don’t agree with something I want to control the narrative in a certain direction that doesn’t include everything doesn’t make it uncivil Mojoandvoodoo (talk) 17:38, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Just because you don’t agree With some thing and want to control the narrative so that it goes in a certain direction and doesn’t include everything doesn’t make it “uncivil”

It’s definitely not civil to Prevent information from being debated because you want to control a narrative Mojoandvoodoo (talk) 17:40, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Richat Structure. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 17:46, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Except adding details that Your personal desire to control a narrrive excludes isn’t vandalism... Mojoandvoodoo (talk) 17:48, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Reporting both administration accounts to Wikipedia so that information That should be available can be available once your accounts get deactivated Mojoandvoodoo (talk) 17:55, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 17:59, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * Your edits were reverted because you added text in the middle of a reference... Accusing admins of "controlling a narrative" for undoing your mistake is foolish.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 18:01, 26 January 2021 (UTC)  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 18:01, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Attentionally preventing hundreds of thousands of users from connecting Atlantis to the website is definitely controlling the narrative and our new plan is to report you guys for failing in your duty to Wikipedia Mojoandvoodoo (talk) 18:02, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Intentionally Mojoandvoodoo (talk) 18:02, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Atlantis? As in the "lost city'?  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 18:03, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

As in the middle exactly like Troy that we would like to see research and if no one discusses we can’t see research on to see if it’s a mess or not Mojoandvoodoo (talk) 18:04, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

In the myth exactly like troy Mojoandvoodoo (talk) 18:04, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

This is literally Heinrich Schliemann all over again Mojoandvoodoo (talk) 18:04, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to start messaging me anytime I’ve already reported your account for not following the Wikipedia standards of everyone contributing to the encyclopedia Mojoandvoodoo (talk) 18:06, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Neat! I've never been accused of being in a cabal to hide Atlantis from people...  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 18:06, 26 January 2021 (UTC)


 * stop Mojoandvoodoo (talk) 18:06, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

No one is suggesting there’s a cabal to hide any

However there’s the obvious proof here you’re intentionally preventing it from being discussed

Which I’m currently discussing with Wikipedia via email So once again your account has already been noted and you’re welcome to leave me alone whenever you’re ready Mojoandvoodoo (talk) 18:11, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Ah, okay. Well, I'll leave you to it. Tell Jimbo I say hello.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 18:14, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Indefinite block
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. El_C 18:05, 26 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for letting me know your account needs to be reported as well Mojoandvoodoo (talk) 18:08, 26 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Uh, you're welcome...? El_C 18:09, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Troy?
So I guess you need to teach yourself about Heinrich Schliemann and how long we knew about Troy before anyone researched or admitted it... Mojoandvoodoo (talk) 18:07, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Talk page access revoked
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Also, for future reference: WP:JIMBO. El_C 18:29, 26 January 2021 (UTC)