User talk:Mojoemoji

A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating I Have A Dream Foundation, Mojoemoji!

Wikipedia editor Steve9821 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Next time try to add free images to the articles. These images can be got from Wikimedia commons."

To reply, leave a comment on Steve9821's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Speedy deletion nomination of Netherlands Red Cross


A tag has been placed on Netherlands Red Cross requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ♦ Tentinator ♦ 17:00, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Netherlands Red Cross
Hi there, I've dropped the CSD for the article Netherlands Red Cross that you've started but please, rewrite and improve the article as copyrighted contents are not allowed in Wikipedia. Thanks, - Voidz  (t·c) 17:10, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks, will re-word.17:57, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Try re-wording hurry as copyrighted materials are speedily deleted. I'm requesting you because i think the topic is worthy of an encyclopedic page. And please, don't remove the CSD tags by yourself as repeating this will be considered as disruptive editing. - Voidz  (t·c) 18:15, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * There isn't really a hurry - you can always recreate the article at a later time or get it undeleted easily. ♦ Tentinator ♦  18:30, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Just check the current wording and the wording on the original site as it is right now - even use the bot that you had used. I have reworded the article. Mojoemoji (talk) 18:47, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. ♦ Tentinator ♦ 18:06, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Netherlands Red Cross
This page => Netherlands Red Cross should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because I have reworded the article to the best I can. There are some statements that must appear as they are from the source like the motto and name of the organization and its mother organization. Some numbers like the number of volunteers and staff must also appear as they are from the source. Some terms like Red cross must also appear as they are at the source unless the terms and numbers are metamorphosing to something else once they come to Wikipedia. See dup report here

Talkback
- Voidz  (t·c) 05:40, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Mugshots removal, Mojoemoji!

Wikipedia editor Civeel just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"User find more links to add to the article from other inlinks on WIkipedia. Civeel (talk) 03:03, 19 April 2013 (UTC)"

To reply, leave a comment on Civeel's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Merge discussion for Mugshots removal
An article that you have been involved in editing, Mugshots removal, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. TreyGeek (talk) 19:27, 23 April 2013 (UTC)