User talk:Moksha88/Archive 2

November 2019
— Harshil want to talk? 03:53, 15 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Thank you for making me aware. I have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Regarding the comments in the Morari Bapu article, I was disputing its inclusion into an encyclopedia as outlined by Ms Sarah Welch here and thus cited WP:WWIN in my edit summary. Even quoted her in the last final statement before calling consensus and removing the material from the article. Otherwise, please indicate the rationale for sanctions (WP:NOTHERE). Moksha88 (talk) 23:13, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
 * , nothing to worry. It is just an administrative instructions. If you feel strong and attached to any topic, you should not edit it to avoid conflict and stress. Other topics are there. Still you are free to choose. For Morari Bapu comment, the article on criticism was of sect and should be have scholarly criticism so it was removed while in Morari Bapu article it was about his personal controversy (not about sect criticism) so was kept. Hope it clarifies. -Nizil (talk) 03:01, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Moksha88! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 21:15, Friday, November 15, 2019 (UTC)

You should read notice carefully.
Issuing notice doesn't mean there is any problem with your contributions. But it means that you are aware of sanctions in this area. If notice is not issued in 12 months then block can't be applied. Regards, Harshil want to talk? 02:40, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * , thank you for clarifying. Moksha88 (talk) 02:54, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * You can also put


 * template on your talk page to avoid warnings in future. — Harshil want to talk? 03:18, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Moksha88! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 19:12, Monday, November 18, 2019 (UTC)

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Please have a look at NPOVN#Morari Bapu. -Nizil (talk) 06:13, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

My Reverted content on BAPS page
Hi Moksha88

You reverted my changes on BAPS page and left a message on my talk page that my content was disruptive, how was my content disruptive? Can you elaborate on that?

--Sanatandharmaway (talk) 03:51, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Revert
You reverted content that proven right by various sources Nickayane99 (talk) 03:00, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Arbitration enforcement request (India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan)
I have requested arbitration enforcement in response to your edits in the India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan topic area. Please see for details. —  Newslinger  talk   05:42, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Inappropriate canvassing on India-related discussions
Hi Moksha88, you recently sent seven messages to other editors' talk pages with the intention of influencing noticeboard discussions. This behavior is known as canvassing, and is inappropriate on Wikipedia. The seven messages were:


 * 1) 8 March 2020: Inappropriate canvassing of to
 * 2) 8 March 2020: Inappropriate canvassing of to
 * 3) 8 March 2020: Inappropriate canvassing of to
 * 4) 13 March 2020: Inappropriate canvassing of to
 * 5) 13 March 2020: Inappropriate canvassing of to
 * 6) 13 March 2020: Inappropriate canvassing of to
 * 7) 13 March 2020: Inappropriate canvassing of to

On 8 March 2020, you posted (with minor variations):

The above message is inappropriate, because it presents an argument to the recipient ("No examples are provided of a lack of editorial oversight or inaccurate reporting"), states an opinion on the discussion ("it seems the discussion is based more on retaliation than reason"), and was directed at specific editors instead of a neutral venue.

On 13 March 2020, you posted:

The above message is inappropriate, because it directly asks the recipient to participate in the discussion ("chime in when you get a chance"), suggests a position ("I think there's confusion...") relative to the consensus of the discussion, and was directed at specific editors instead of a neutral venue.

It is acceptable to alert WikiProjects and noticeboards of other discussions, but only if the contents of your message are neutral and do not advance a point of view. Please keep this in mind as you edit Wikipedia. Thank you. —  Newslinger  talk   22:49, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Standard warning
It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. —  Newslinger  talk   22:59, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I'll add that, having examined the report at, there is no doubt that you breached our norms on canvassing twice. Please take this warning seriously as I am convinced that a further breach on your part would inevitably lead to strong sanctions being imposed on you. --RexxS (talk) 00:07, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I'll add that, having examined the report at, there is no doubt that you breached our norms on canvassing twice. Please take this warning seriously as I am convinced that a further breach on your part would inevitably lead to strong sanctions being imposed on you. --RexxS (talk) 00:07, 14 March 2020 (UTC)