User talk:Molecular Structures

September 2017
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Shock Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 21:00, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

DS alert climate change
NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 23:56, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

followup comments
Hello, the rules for DS require the above template. I also sent one to myself. They are intended to prevent problems by simply providing FYI type information. To try to win consensus for your desired changes, please use the respective article talk page, per WP:BRD and follow the etiquette at WP:TPG. Thanks NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 23:58, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to ExxonMobil climate change controversy has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:34, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: ExxonMobil climate change controversy was changed by Molecular Structures (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.876548 on 2017-10-01T19:34:36+00:00.

WP:Neutrality
Regarding this, do read the WP:Neutrality policy, especially its WP:Due weight section. Neutrality on Wikipedia does not mean the same thing that the term neutrality means in common discourse. Furthermore, your preferred term is even noted as inaccurate in the article it redirects to. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 19:43, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Your edit at ACC
While your edit was not considered entirely disruptive, you removed eventually a references for the preceding content parts. prokaryotes (talk) 20:18, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

BLP violation
Your edit, repeated here, reintroduced a falsehood into the biography of James Hansen, citing only which has nothing to do with Hansen. Please desist from edit warring, and stop adding WP:BLP violations. . . dave souza, talk 07:53, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Your change to Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
There is already a discussion about this header at Talk:Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Several editor have attempted to rename the Conservative nature of IPCC reports, but it seems the WP:EDITCONSENSUS has been to keep it as is. Please discuss before attempting this change again. Peaceray (talk) 00:07, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:40, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change was changed by Molecular Structures (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.85548 on 2017-10-24T05:40:54+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Carbon dioxide. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:38, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Carbon dioxide was changed by Molecular Structures (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950231 on 2017-10-25T02:38:20+00:00.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. DMacks (talk) 04:09, 28 October 2017 (UTC)