User talk:Moleskin

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Francs2000 00:09, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Little London
I wish I could tell you where the information on Little London came from but unfortunately I can't. What I can tell you is that the source stated the facts as laid out in that article. If they're wrong then change them: that's what this encyclopedia is about, though if someone else comes along afterward and points to the original source I used (wherever it is) and says what you've written is wrong, you need to be able to defend your version of history. -- Francs2000 23:59, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks (testing) Moleskin 23:22, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Lace school
Hi, could you list your reference(s) for the article Lace school? Thanks, Melchoir 23:24, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

That was quick! Sorry still a greenhorn in Wikipedia land - is that OK? Moleskin 23:34, 15 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Of course! I didn't mean to discourage you at all; an increasingly visible community like Wikipedia needs all the new help it can get. I just wanted to drop you a note while your source was fresh in your mind. Sometimes an article doesn't list its source, and its author goes missing, so no one is left to verify the material. Anyway, keep up the good work! Melchoir 23:44, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Hello
I feel happy to see you and talking to you. There was no problem with the word as such - normally the word/s relating to the page name is made bold in the first sentence. In any case, you may have done this yourself - I just saw, and mad ethat bold. Cheers! We shall do several thing together. --Bhadani 14:31, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Maps with dots on
I have absolutely no idea, but I would look to the people who have been uploading the maps and ask one of them. Each image has its own page showing the full history of the image, for example this one for Aylesbury. There is also a category called GBdot showing all of the ones that have been uploaded to date. -- Francs2000 11:58, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Mr Ruffin
Brookie here - I actually enjoy Reggae a lot - so you're wrong on that one! The article deleted was simply not notable as you had left it. If you are working on something and don't want it jumped on post on the page whilst you are beavering away! Good luck Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 07:35, 4 April 2006 (UTC)


 * I have re-created it for you as requested and tagged it as inuse - so get working on it before someone else has a go at it! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 13:31, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Oakley Chandos Arms.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Oakley Chandos Arms.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Stan 13:40, 4 April 2006 (UTC) Done - OK? Moleskin 08:20, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Image:Oakley church.png
Thanks for clarifying that you did create Image:Oakley church.png. There's just one more question: What license will you use to release it? Generally, as a contributor to Wikipedia your contributions are licensed under the WP:GFDL, but you may also choose to release the photograph into the public domain or use a Creative Commons license. Please visit WP:ICT, pick a license tag, and edit the image page accordingly. If you need help with this, please contact me on my talk page. the iBook of the Revolution 18:22, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Brill and Waterperry
It's fairly standard stuff. I have left a message for them. -- Fr a ncs2000 22:37, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Space_Patrol.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Space_Patrol.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 12:53, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

RE:Oxford Senior League Division 1
Hello! I hope you are feeling great! With regards to your question, the answer is a resounding YES. In fact, I am planning to create articles for ALL the divisions within the English football league system and eventually for the whole of the football world as well. However, a considerable amount of research is needed for this massive task and I am approaching this with a slow and steady attitude. In the meantime, you can also help out with this as well. Moreover, I am also planning to create articles for ALL the soccer clubs within the English system as well. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  13:51, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * However, sometimes I feel that I am the only user in Wikipedia who has the passion for doing this. Most of the other users would object of this because of notability issues. I mean, which football fan would be interested in reading about lower league clubs or divisions in England as well as in the other countries? This is a niche area to be involed with. And when I see articles about non-legaue clubs in other countries being deleted, it pains me. However, I am confident that this mentality among users in Wikipedia would change in the future. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  14:24, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Oakley United F.C. (England)
fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: Club does not meet WikiProject Football's notability criteria (see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Notability) --Android Mouse Bot 2 17:47, 17 May 2007 (UTC) Hi I noticed that you left a messsage on the articles talk page contesting the proposed deletion. However, in order to contest it you need to go to here - where you will see that users leave comments and their vote (either voting Keep or delete). If you want to contest this then you need to go there and vote to Keep, but you also need to give valid reasons as to why you vote that way. (Please note also that the vote needs to be in bold) There is no point in leaving a message on the articles talk page as it won't be seen. Please also remember that you should sign any comments by adding four tildes (~) at the end of your message. Thank you. ♦Tangerines♦ · Talk 15:23, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Alehouse v. Public house
I think in Oakley, Buckinghamshire you may need to spell out the distinction between alehouse and pub, because in Wikipedia Alehouse redirects to Public house. -- Roleplayer 13:09, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Good thinking hadn't thought of that Moleskin 12:23, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Oakley_Post_Office.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Oakley_Post_Office.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:10, 8 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 02:10, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Oakley_Church_font.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Oakley_Church_font.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:04, 8 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 03:04, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sir Timothy Tyrrell (Snr)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sir Timothy Tyrrell (Snr), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  role player 21:50, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Charles Edmund Clutterbuck
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Charles Edmund Clutterbuck, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.stainedglassmuseum.com/collections/clutter.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:51, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Oakley Chandos Arms.png
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Oakley Chandos Arms.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:06, 9 November 2008 (UTC) --Ricky81682 (talk) 05:06, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Elizabeth Tyrrell


The article Elizabeth Tyrrell has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Don't see how she is notable. Seems like she's only notable because her father is. Can't find her anywhere on Google either. Yields very few search results.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Proudbolsahye (talk) 06:25, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Oakley church.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Oakley church.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 10:32, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of places in Buckinghamshire, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Penn and Denham. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of places in Buckinghamshire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lane End. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of places in Buckinghamshire, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages St Leonards and Loudwater. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * List of places in Buckinghamshire
 * added links pointing to Stowe, Broughton, Hambledon, Bourne End, Burcott and Lane End

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of places in Buckinghamshire, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Penn and Marlow. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * List of places in Buckinghamshire
 * added links pointing to Hughenden, Hitcham, Slapton, Burnham and Jordans

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of places in Buckinghamshire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Calvert. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

"Not a village"?
On what basis are you deciding that places widely known as villages are "not a village"? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 11:34, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

The basis I was using was whether the text within the article said the place was a village or a hamlet. Also when possible I checked to see if there was a church at the place which normally differentiates a village and a hamlet. Moleskin (talk) 09:06, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I agree if the text says hamlet. But whether or not it has a church is more than a bit dated. If a a place has grown from five houses to 500, is it still a hamlet until it gets a CoE church? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 12:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, I must be showing my age with my village definition. My intention was to go through the 'Places In Buckinghamshire' wiki-page and ensure anything that said village was in category 'Villages in Buckinghamshire' and anything saying hamlet was in category 'Hamlets in Buckinghamshire'. Interesting question though, Skirmett for instance is now listed as a hamlet, but used to have an All Saints church (now a house), so was/is it a village still or a hamlet? I have no axe to grind whether something is a village or not, so I am happy if you wish to re-instate any categories. For your information, I am next about to update 'Places in Buckinghamshire' with the various districts and estates in MK. Moleskin (talk) 13:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * No worries, my fault for overreacting when I saw so many changes with a terse edit summary. Short of wp:OR, there is no modern way to distinguish between hamlets and villages. A place is a town if the parish council says it is. A city used to need a cathedral, now it is not relevant.
 * Presumably you know about Category:Areas of Milton Keynes
 * The only 'estate' as such is Lakes Estate. Almost all the grid-squares had multiple developers/developments and have a variety of tenures (and some are mixed commercial/residential). --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 17:40, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks John, please continue correcting me if I get things wrong. Moleskin (talk) 07:15, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

In Buckinghamshire
Surely you aren't asserting that villages in the Borough of Milton Keynes are not also in Buckinghamshire? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 11:40, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

As above John, I looked at the article and if it said it was not a village, I removed from the category. I did realize that with Milton Keynes, there might be some places that are still called villages and are suburbs, estates, etc and vice versa. Moleskin (talk) 09:06, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Many of the districts ["grid squares"] in MK have – by design – an original village (or hamlet!) at their heart. It is still a village, no matter what surrounds it. [The exception that proves the rule is Water Eaton, which was completely erased by LCC and/or Bletchley UDC (pre-MK)]. This question is what the Americans call moot because it was founded on a false premise: I misread your intentions: I thought you were removing all B of MK villages from Bucks. I ought to have come back to delete this subsection. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 12:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject Buckinghamshire
I noticed your edits to the List of places in Buckinghamshire including completing the conversion of the static list to tables which I started ages ago (despite User:Tmol42's objections). Are you a local of the county? I've been interested in reviving the WikiProject for a good while and was wondering if you'd like to join us? My initial ghoal was to improve the quality of List of Places in Buckinghamshire to reflect a few of the Featured articles similar to it. It's a gargantuan task which I'm glad I'll have some help with. Thanks. UaMaol (talk) 02:08, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello there, I am indeed from Buckinghamshire (Oakley) and hopefully have added a bit to the List of Places in Buckinghamshire. I have always been a loner of Wikipedia, so would like to know a bit more about the WikiProject. Moleskin (talk) 07:39, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Oving Villages Cup for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oving Villages Cup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Oving Villages Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:00, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Dorton Dons moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Dorton Dons, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 06:54, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dorton Dons


The article Dorton Dons has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NORG, lacks any sources or references. Has been tagged as such since April 2008, without any improvement since then. Have searched the web and cannot find any reliable independent secondary sources, needed to establish notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 03:30, 15 February 2024 (UTC)