User talk:Molestash/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, Molestash, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! -- &oelig; &trade; 21:29, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Wikipedia Ambassador Program at MSU
Hi! I'm leaving you this message because you're listed as a Wikipedian associated with Michigan State University. The Wikipedia Ambassador Program is currently looking for Campus Ambassadors to help with Wikipedia assignments at MSU, which will be participating in the Public Policy Initiative for the Spring 2011 semester. The role of Campus Ambassadors will be to provide face-to-face training and support for students on Wikipedia-related skills (how to edit articles, how to add references, etc.). This includes doing in-class presentations, running workshops and labs, possibly holding office hours, and in general providing in-person mentorship for students.

Prior Wikipedia skills are not required for the role, as training will be provided for all Campus Ambassadors (although, of course, being an experienced editor is a plus).

If you are interested in being a Wikipedia Campus Ambassador, or know someone in the East Lansing area who might be, please email me or leave a message on my talk page.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 20:27, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

 * Welcome to the project and please let me know if you have any comments, questions or suggestions. --Kumioko (talk) 18:16, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

New Years Message for WikiProject United States
With the first of what I hope will be monthly newsletters I again want to welcome you to the project and hope that as we all work together through the year we can expand the project, create missing articles and generally improve the pedia thought mutual cooperation and support. Now that we have a project and a solid pool of willing members I wanted to strike while the iron is hot and solicite help in doing a few things that I believe is a good next step in solidifiing the project. I have outlined a few suggestions where you can help with on the projects talk page. This includes but is not limited too updating Portal:United States, assessing the remaining US related articles that haven't been assessed, eliminating the Unrefernced BLP's and others. If you have other suggestions or are interested in doing other things feel free. I just wanted to offer a few suggestions were additional help is needed. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions, comments or suggestions or you can always post something on the projects talk page. If you do not want to recieve a monthly message please put an * before your name on the members page.--Kumioko (talk) 03:51, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Stub
Is there any reason why you mischaracterize an enormous amount of articles as "stub" class? For example, how is George Platt Brett a stub? The article could use more sources, but it's clearly way larger than a stub. I haven't checked all your edits obviously, but all those I did check were not a stub. Please get a better understanding of what constitutes a stub class article before you continue tagging like that.--Atlan (talk) 21:45, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

-I'll admit I dropped the ball on George Platt Brett as characterizing it as a stub but, I went through the majority of the articles I rated and very few had any meaningful content. Size is not the only criteria for a stub article. A stub is, a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article. It is usually very short, but if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible, an article of any length falls into this category. If you fell a different rating will suffice on other articles I rated feel free to do so.MOLEY (talk) 16:18, 25 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, you edited so many articles, I'm not going to go check them all as that would take a long time. Tagging them as stubs when they aren't isn't so bad that it requires immediate reversal anyway. I just wanted to point out you should take a little more time checking the articles, as it seems you were going through lots of articles at great speed.--Atlan (talk) 17:44, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

New WikiProject United States Newsletter: February 2011 edition
Starting with the February 2011 issue WikiProject United States has established a newsletter to inform anyone interested in United States related topics of the latest changes. This newsletter will not only discuss issues relating to WikiProject United States but also: You may read or assist in writing the newsletter, subscribe, unsubscribe or change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you by following this link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page or the Newsletters talk page. --Kumioko (talk) 20:42, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Portal:United States
 * 2) the United States Wikipedians Noticeboard
 * 3) the United States Wikipedians collaboration of the Month - The collaboration article for February is Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
 * 4) and changes to Wikipolicy, events and other things that may be of interest to you.

April 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 00:58, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

May 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
. --Kumioko (talk) 15:43, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011
To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:09, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 22:11, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:34, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 13:00, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Skibsted
Hi Molestash - I have seen your latest edit to  the Skibsted article. Skibsted was a Dane from Denmark, not a Dutchman from Holland. The confusion in the minds of many native English speakers is quite common. Or do you have something that links this article to Holland? Clarify or correct? Viking1808 (talk) 06:58, 13 August 2011 (UTC)


 * My bad I made a silly mistake. Thanks for catching it.--MOLEY (talk) 20:13, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:41, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Rollback
Hello, following a review of your contributions, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please take note of the following:
 * Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
 * Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
 * Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
 * Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
 * Please read Help:Reverting and Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
 * You can test Rollback at New admin school/Rollback
 * You can display the userbox or the  top icon on your user page
 * If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:28, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
&oelig; &trade; 03:53, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

September 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 02:39, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 18:23, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Stephen Martin Saxby
You removed the military history banner from Stephen Martin Saxby. From what I understand Saxby was in the Navy and used to hand out lists of days when atmospheric disturbances would occur at sea. Other sailors in the navy used these lists from what I understand unless you find evidence to the contrary. This would be the 1800s. Saxby also had a well known disagreement with Admiral Robert Fitzroy. The disagreement appears in print in the second edition of saxby's book. Msruzicka (talk) 22:16, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I understand he is notable for his pseudo Meteorology and printed theories but he does not meet the MILHIST requirements here. Association with a person doesn't mean notability along. The partial use of meteorological notes doesn't meet the notability requirements either because they didn't "significantly changed the nature of or conduct of war".--MOLEY (talk) 22:43, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Logs
Just a follow up: I fixed the issue that was making the code hang, and the WP bot uploaded new logs for the military history project now. &mdash; Carl (CBM · talk) 20:51, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Nathaniel G. S. Hart
Re: this edit, I have subsequently edited and, I think, improved the article and would appreciate it if you would give it another assessment. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 07:11, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Foxconn
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Foxconn. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 04:15, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 02:32, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Macrianus Major
Hello Molestash! Was there any request for assessment of that article? I am asking because I would like to check the related discussion. Other than that, I think "start class" is a bit harsh. Definitely not a "B" (almost single-sourced) but pretty good for "C" I think. In any case, I hope to add more references and, hopefully, more details, in the near future. Have a nice day! --Dipa1965 (talk) 21:05, 31 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Hello Dipa, There wasn't any request for assessment on Macrianus Major but it is policy in MIHIST to make sure every article has a rating and B-class checklist complete on every article (Even though the B-Class Checklist is quite backlogged). I disagree whole heartedly that the article is a B-Class. It doesn't have a defined structure required for the C-Class status. It wouldn't be hard to make it a C but I am not trying to make every article a C just give info on what the current state of the article is. I would be happy to reassess once more info is placed into the article. Good Day to you.--MOLEY (talk) 00:56, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mellanox Technologies
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mellanox Technologies. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 04:15, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kodak
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Kodak. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 05:15, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

In re. Astra 400
My copy of the 'Book of Pistols and Revolvers' states "Striking energy is in the neighbourhood of 370 foot-pounds" for 9mm Steyr. For 9mm Bayard Long (9mm Largo), it gives a "muzzle striking energy about 360 foot-pounds." My guess is that the numbers come from chronograph readings from the M1912 and Astra 400 respectively. It is also noted that in both cases, the rounds had been hotted up considerably from their original loadings, and that both cartridges were used in submachineguns. Neither round was then being made by a US manufacturer from whom the authors could get factory loading data, so I suppose it is possible that the particular sort of mystery meat round that they were feeding their pistols was the kind meant to be eaten by Spanish and Austrian submachine guns.

The book aside, I do vaguely remember seeing a forum post where some Steyr shooters were discussing the merits of loading a little lower than the standard handloading data. There might be some dodgy information floating around- or perhaps the Steyrs have just held up to the years less well than the handsome grandfather of the Hi-Points. Nevard (talk) 23:57, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on File talk:North Strathfield Bank.JPG
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on File talk:North Strathfield Bank.JPG. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 09:18, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 08:31, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Amigo Energy
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Amigo Energy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 10:15, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 03:56, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

First Battle of Grodno (1920)
Regarding this edit, mind if I ask which parts of the coverage and accuracy criterion hasn't this article met? Specifically, what important facts is this article missing? It's not likely to ever rach B status as there's simply not enough sources to mention that battle, but I believe you made a mistake when it comes to coverage and accuracy.  // Halibutt 23:01, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

After double checking through some stuff I think you're right. The information in the article is or nearly is as much as an editor is going to be able to write about the battle. My optimism about the possibility of more detail on the battle seems misplaced. I shall now have a good Wikicry about my over optimism. --MOLEY (talk) 03:36, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

TY
Thanks for the barnstar.  Volunteer Marek  00:36, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Capitalism
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Capitalism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 11:15, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Kumi-Taskbot
Thanks for showing me that problem. I'll get that fixed. It only removes certain parameters if they =no or blanks but I'm not sure why its doing the bad formatting so I'll make sure that gets fixed. I'll also run back through and see about fixing any that got screwed up. Please let me know if you see anything else. --Kumioko (talk) 22:18, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:53, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Virginia Military Institute Article Assessment
Thank you for reviewing the B-class criteria for the Virginia Military Institute article. I knew that the article qualifies for inclusion in WikiProject Military History, but was not sure if it met the WikiProject's more strigent standards for B-class articles. --TommyBoy (talk) 05:22, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Request for Assessment
If I really thought I could assess these articles myself, would you really think that I would be putting these articles up on this page? Rather than continually removing the articles, why not actually assess them? (Think there might be a reason why the page is called Requests for Assessment if the articles can't be assessed?)
 * Sorry about the previous edit. I had stepped away from my computer for a few minutes and someone must have used my account. Wild Wolf (talk) 17:07, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * If you would so kindly inform the original editor User talk:64.6.124.31 that the subsection of the assessment page is for articles that quote, "(An editor) made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion" and that the articles listed had not been improved by the IP address thus not belonging on the page. I will go through the suggested articles personally and reassess them but would like to remind him of WP:CIVIL.--MOLEY (talk) 18:24, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I can definately try. (And I'll remember to log off before stepping away from the computer. Very sorry again.) Wild Wolf (talk) 21:14, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Indian rupee
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Indian rupee. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 22:17, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for comments
I'll work to see if I can make changes you've suggested. Perhaps, in the end, your skepticism will be correct. Given the current direction of things such an alliance may become increasingly important in the coming years. -Darouet (talk) 23:02, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for classifying the Levant Schooner Flotilla article! -Darouet (talk) 17:15, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Military Historian of the Year
Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:50, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.

January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 18:21, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Confucius Institute
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Confucius Institute. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 23:15, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

South Pacific air ferry route in World War II‎
My time here editing is limited at the moment. Will pick up on this when time permits, have much more information to add and will let you know so it can be re-assed. Bwmoll3 (talk) 15:34, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem all you really need is some citations and that article is well on it's way.--MOLEY (talk) 16:39, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXX, January 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:24, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of countries by GDP (nominal)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of countries by GDP (nominal). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 00:15, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:IQ and the Wealth of Nations
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:IQ and the Wealth of Nations. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 00:15, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ushuaia
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ushuaia. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 01:15, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXI, February 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 10:12, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Seattle FilmWorks
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Seattle FilmWorks. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 00:15, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:British Rail Class 458
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:British Rail Class 458. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 01:15, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXII, March 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:26, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Spirulina (dietary supplement)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Spirulina (dietary supplement). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 02:15, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Contras
Hi Molestash! You recently assessed the contras article as B class. Could you advise on what it would take to lift it to Good Article status? Cheers, --Mallexikon (talk) 03:00, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Reactions to Occupy Wall Street
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Reactions to Occupy Wall Street. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 03:15, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Aircraft carriers
Dear Molestash, it looks like a nice work. I would just advance a few comments (in the most friendly terms). Do not hesitate to contact me (please post messages directly to my Wikipedia Italy userpage at [], as I very seldom open my US one. All the best and congratulations for the very nice graphic improvements you have done on my very amatourial work. --Arturolorioli (talk) 14:55, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
 * As you do have a "Service" field, I guess it is not necessary to have separate sections for each navy. Enter the ships in a single gorup, sorted for "name" by default (and then users can sort the list as they wish).
 * The term "accompaniment" to indicate the aircraft load ... looks horrible! Meaybe a simple "airctaft component" would be better?
 * As you have nicely inserted sortable fields, maybe the locations could be indicated by generic area. So, for example, Baltic (Łeba Harbor), or Mediterranean (Genova Harbour), That will allow a more meaningfull sorting for the "Place of Sinking" field.
 * Of course you have been forced to cut a bit of non-essential info from the new template, but I would keep them at least as "ref" (endpage) notes. Even better, I would delete the "Notes" field, move all the notes to "ref" (endpage) position, and put a new field (or space) withe she ships' warflag just after the picture. It will add a nice touch of "colour" to an otherwise very black-and-white page.
 * My apologies, I didn't mean to edit your Sandbox, I didn't pay attention to the top and just started scrolling down the page best regards Mztourist (talk) 19:09, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Otto Christian Hammer
Hi there, I see you have assessed this biography for WP:MILHIST but found it lacking references. Since the article does have a fair number of inline citations from (mostly) reliable sources I was wondering about that. The only problem in terms of reliable references I'd see here is that self-published website by Balsved. All the printed literature cited there is however reliable, if not in English for that matter. De728631 (talk) 22:25, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The referencing is pretty good the only problems I have are, with the general citations do not include cover all of the in line citations and all the decorations do not have citations. I would agree that the citations are pretty reliable as well though. A side note the article will not pass a B-Class until the intro covers the article better. Check Audie Murphy for an acceptable intro style. Good Work though. Much Ado, --MOLEY (talk) 23:09, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * It's common editorial practice to only list references in a "general" or "works cited" section that are used more than once, and when that is done one only gives a brief footnote like "Name, year" referring to the full citation in the end. Single references instead occur only in the list of footnotes and are not repeated in another list. That aside, I have now expanded the lead and have also referenced the decorations with Balsved's website. De728631 (talk) 23:42, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles/Conventions
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles/Conventions. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 03:36, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Radical Right
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Radical Right. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 04:15, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXIII, April 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:26, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

B-class checklisted?

 * Hi~! After SAR 80, would you mind giving your peer review for →SR 88←? Thanks~! -- Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 02:11, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Done comments on talk-page --MOLEY (talk) 02:35, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks heap~! -- Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 14:34, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Interim dividend
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Interim dividend. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 18:17, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Milhist
Hi, Molestash. You just assessed Bruno Müller (Nazi official). Please explain what you meant by 1. Referencing and citation: criterion not met 2. Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met and 5. Supporting materials: criterion not met. I would very much like to address your points in my subsequent edits. As of now however, almost every statement made in that article is already supported by a separate inline citation. Where do I go from here? Please explain. And, thanks in advance. Poeticbent talk 19:02, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * A short list of things to work on


 * I failed the references because very little talks about him also my computer is telling me one of the PDFs has a virus attached to it
 * Very little on how he was notable, His unit was convicted of murdering civilians but he skirts by
 * The Sections are terrible. You need an intro that properly summarizes the paper
 * Some information in the Films section doesn't talk about Müller but the actor that portrayed him which is off topic.
 * The article doesn't cover his early life or fairly young death at 55

Thanks for the reply. I left a note for you at the article's talk page with regard to the B-Class criteria. Unfortunately, I didn't find much about his personal life and professional experience online. Nothing at all about his early life for example, etc. I will work on it though. Promise. Poeticbent talk 23:02, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Spanish Civil War
Long story short. I need to take a break from Wikipedia for awhile. I am a little frustrated with the Spanish Civil War article. My frustration is not with the SCW article, per se, but it's more along the lines of why can't I find I a reason why Paul Robeson suddenly desired to go to Spain during the war. The SCW article is a massively complex articles, so my complaint is not completely valid. That being said, that whole section I complained about is poorly written.


 * 1) it reads like someone announcing the starting lineup to an nba all star game
 * 2) you should not include authors names like: "even author x, y, and z" agree with this. Is Wikipedia a poll among authors?
 * I, and only I (I'm sure I'm breaking rules by saying this) get to say "author and historian of Robeson, his son, Paul Robeson Jr., said x,y, and z" because I have to highlight/indicate a possible prejudice. There is no reason in the SCW article for mentioning the author's names. And, umm, it wastes bytes and I absolutely despise "name dropping". You can use the bytes to put more info in the article
 * 1) That article should not include any of the authors names (oh, I said that, well I'll say it again)

I know what I want. I got "I Saw Spain Die" and one other book of a similar title name. That being said. I need to take a break from Wikipedia.

The bar is really high on the SCW article because you can not refute Boyle and Bunie saying "the SCW was a cause celebre on the left..." My reading comprehension is poor, maybe I missed it the article's explanation of the SCW's impact on music/politics/arts 66.234.33.8 (talk) 00:31, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * To be honest, I could not care less about the SCW article and I should reworded what I wrote on the talk page. I apologize. That being said, I honestly do not care one iota about the Robeson article either. I don't like him, I don't hate him, he's been dead for 50 years, communism has been dead for 30 years. But that section in the SCW is poorly written. 66.234.33.8 (talk) 00:37, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Glenora Distillers
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Glenora Distillers. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 19:15, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXIV, May 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 15:04, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Marketing mix
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Marketing mix. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 21:15, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Assessment of Dyott Bomber
Can you please explain your assessment of the Dyott Bomber article, where you have failed it on point B1 – is suitably referenced and cited - despite the fact that everything is cited to Reliable sources, on B2 – reasonably covers the topic -0 withouut any indication on wehat gaps there are on the article, and on point B5 – contains appropriate supporting graphics, infoboxes, or images - where the article has an infobox - to quote from the Milhist FAQ - "The fail really only applies if the article has no graphic (infobox, photos, graphics) at all. What we don't want is pages that are a wall of text, with nothing to break it up or add visual interest.".Nigel Ish (talk) 21:49, 2 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I failed B2 because it has an insufficient lead and it seems more appropriate that an insufficient lead is part of B2 and not B3. I failed B5 because from my experiences every article needs some graphic to be considered B-Class and and infobox alone no longer constitutes a B. I failed B1 erroneously and apologize for my actions. I also do understand since only 2 aircraft were completed that I should judge the plane similarly to Grumman XSBF as the information will not be as broad as for other aircraft. --MOLEY (talk) 21:56, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:SCE Studio Liverpool
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:SCE Studio Liverpool. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 22:15, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Polish–Prussian alliance
Thanks for reviewing this. If you could post on its talk with more info on what is missing, I'll try to address the issues. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 20:30, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, ref added. Is it B-class now? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 23:04, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Louis Purnell
Thanks for the review. Do you have military sources you could suggest to improve the article? Online ones would be easiest for me but if you have access to others, please let me know that too. Alanscottwalker (talk) 12:41, 16 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I think Google Books has the complete book Black Knights: the Story of the Tuskegee Airmen. It my be useful to use and get some citations out of to get Louis closer to a B-Class.--MOLEY (talk) 13:50, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reminding me that I meant to mention in the article that he wrote the forward for that book (although that part of the book, is not online). I did find one amusing anecdote to cite to from what is online, in the article.  Alanscottwalker (talk) 16:34, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Eddie Rocket's
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Eddie Rocket's. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 23:15, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

GOCE July 2012 Copy Edit Drive
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 19:14, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Wineries, breweries and distilleries of New Jersey
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Wineries, breweries and distilleries of New Jersey. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 00:15, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

thanks
Thanks - that's my first B! *bounce* Secretlondon (talk) 21:33, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

RAF Worthy Down
Hello Molestash

Thank you for assessing the RAF Worthy Down article and completing the b-class checklist. My question is what is wrong with the structure?

Also for referencing fail was it just for the Royal Navy section that needed references or was it something else?

Thanks. Gavbadger (talk) 00:54, 1 July 2012 (UTC)


 * The introduction isn't sufficient for a B-Class Article and needs to better summarize the lead in my opinion to pass B3 ao I expanded it to help. For referencing I'm not sure if the list of units stationed there at one point are all referenced by the bottom quote. If they are, I would submit RAF Worthy Down to the Request for B-Class Assessment on the MILHIST page. As I altered the page can not reassess it. Good Work though! Much Ado, --MOLEY (talk) 01:14, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of CBS television affiliates (table)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of CBS television affiliates (table). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 09:45, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Political activities of the Koch family
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Political activities of the Koch family. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 10:15, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Op Khukri
You rated the page Operation Khukri as Class-C and said that it didn't meet Class-B citations criteria. Can you tell me what the criteria are, so I can try to improve it? Thanks in advance. -- Anurag2k12 (talk) 21:37, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello, Anurag. You need to have at least 1 citation at the end of every paragraph in an article for it to be a B-Class and preferably more just to keep facts verifiable. OP Khurkri is missing tons of citations in the Battle section but because it appears to have decent info I put it at C. Good Work and keep up the great job. Much Ado, --MOLEY (talk) 00:52, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Alrighty. I'm on it. Thaks for telling. -- Anurag2k12 (talk) 13:05, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

I have 1 or more citations on every paragraph now, but the problem is that most of these are from the same website, so this makes the references section seem cluttered. -- Anurag2k12 (talk) 17:14, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXVI, July 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 09:37, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2007–2012 global financial crisis
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2007–2012 global financial crisis. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 00:15, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Visconti Castle
Hello Molestash! I have discovered that there are two articles (Visconti Castle and Castello Visconteo (Pavia)) for the same subject and I was wondering if you could tell me how to solve the problem? Thank you--Byblios (talk) 20:17, 3 August 2012 (UTC)Byblios

Please comment on Talk:Beef Products Inc.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Beef Products Inc.. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 21:15, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:DotConnectAfrica
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:DotConnectAfrica. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 22:15, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXVII, August 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 01:04, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox company
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Infobox company. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 23:15, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Military history coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:32, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:BP
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:BP. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 01:57, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:IMG Academy
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:IMG Academy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 02:15, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Review of Karen Kohanowich
Thank you for reviewing the Karen Kohanowich article for B-Class status. I have now divided the article into sections, which I hope will make it possible for you to change the status of "Structure" to "criterion met", even if the "Coverage and accuracy" criterion is still not met. Thanks again. Gildir (talk) 18:16, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Well that definitely meets B3 now but I feel it is on the B/C bridge still. I rated it as a B class because it has suich great and in depth informatuion about her career in the navy. If you could find some information regarding her life before the Navy especially her birthday and place of birth that would go a long way to solidfy it as a B and make it on it's way to GA. Great work with the article. Much Ado,--MOLEY (talk) 19:12, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:CBS Records
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:CBS Records. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 03:15, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXVIII, September 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project and/or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:50, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ray of Light
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ray of Light. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 04:15, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Review question with regards to HNoMS Storm (1898)
Hi Molestash. Thanks for your review of HNoMS Storm (1898). One question, though, in your review you assess that the article is lacking in referencing and citation. Where exactly are the citations missing? That would be useful for me to know. Thanks in advance for your advice. Manxruler (talk) 10:10, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Honeywell Turbo Technologies
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Honeywell Turbo Technologies. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 04:15, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXIX, October 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Nick-D (talk) and Ian Rose (talk) 02:50, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Recent reassessments of MILHIST articles
Hi Moley, thanks for all your work on assessment! This is my first time working on an assessment backlog, so I've just been moving articles to C to get started, even though some should probably be B. I'll fill in the checklist on the MILHIST articles, except for the part about coverage and accuracy, where I don't generally know enough to comment without doing research. It's pretty impressive, the way MILHIST is keeping up with new articles! Looks like we'll need to enlist some more help over at WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America ... Djembayz (talk) 11:52, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Seafood
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Seafood. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 05:15, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Ticker symbols in article leads
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Ticker symbols in article leads. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 05:19, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Nuveen Investments
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Nuveen Investments. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 06:15, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXX, November 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:39, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:KitchenAid
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:KitchenAid. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 06:18, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Nuveen Investments RFC Reboot
I see that you contributed to the original RFC for this article. As a member who is working on RFC's, I have closed the first one as unresolved, and rebooted it with a more compliant RFC question. I would appreciate your feedback on this new RFC. Thank you Tiggerjay (talk) 07:18, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 07:19, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Austrian School
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Austrian School. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 08:15, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXI, December 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:19, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Nuveen Investments
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Nuveen Investments. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 08:19, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Public Relations Society of America
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Public Relations Society of America. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 09:15, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Flower Mocher
Hmmm, you don't sound very grateful. Why's that? Eddaido (talk) 02:20, 12 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I rated it before the current improvements if you check the time stamps. With the current article I would consider the article a B and say you have done a superb job. I am always grateful with all work put into Wikipedia by volunteers so I am sorry for any misunderstanding. Much Ado, --Molestash (talk) 02:34, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks, all that makes sense, I'm not yet good enough at the job and a B is kind, I'd been suddenly depressed by the start class. Sorry about the misunderstanding. Thanks, Eddaido (talk) 02:41, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Organic milk
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Organic milk. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 09:15, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXII, January 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:17, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pi Kappa Alpha
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pi Kappa Alpha. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 10:15, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Type 26 revolver, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Double action (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Type 26 revolver
Hello! Your submission of Type 26 revolver at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Miyagawa (talk) 11:25, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Extant organization
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Extant organization. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 11:16, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Type 26 revolver
KTC (talk) 19:31, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Social market economy
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Social market economy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 12:15, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIII, February 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:34, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:World financial capital
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:World financial capital. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 15:15, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Type 26 revolver...
...is passed at GA. Nice work! Hchc2009 (talk) 09:36, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Great Commission church movement
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Great Commission church movement. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 16:15, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gift economy
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Gift economy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 16:15, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIV, March 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:04, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ugg boots trademark disputes
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ugg boots trademark disputes. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 17:15, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Silk Road (marketplace)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Silk Road (marketplace). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 17:15, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:PIGS (economics)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:PIGS (economics). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 18:15, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXV, April 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:28, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:BP
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:BP. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 00:40, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVI, May 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:22, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:BP
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:BP. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 01:15, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:March Against Monsanto
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:March Against Monsanto. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 00:15, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:BP
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:BP. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 01:15, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVII, June 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:59, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Murray Rothbard
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Murray Rothbard. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 02:15, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Davison Design & Development
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Davison Design & Development. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 03:15, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:BP
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:BP. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 03:15, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVIII, July 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:35, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Grammarly
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Grammarly. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 03:15, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Welspun Energy
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Welspun Energy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 04:15, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIX, August 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:10, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Roundup (herbicide)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Roundup (herbicide). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 05:15, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback Tool update
Hey Molestash. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.

We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.

Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 21:43, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:WinCo Foods
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:WinCo Foods. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 05:15, 2 September 2013 (UTC)