User talk:Mollsmolyneux/Archive 1

Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia, Edward


 * Don't be afraid to edit articles - be bold
 * If you have any problems, visit the help page, ask me via my talk page or when you see me, or contact your local Wikipedia administrator.
 * Why not start right now. If you're not sure where to go, try searching, browsing, or just jump straight in at a random page.

Also, if you look towards the top of your page, you will find that you can view a page's discussion or edit history, edit it or add it to your watchlist, or look at your user page, talk page, preferences, watchlist of contributions list.

Good look in the Wikipedia world - Jawr256 15:58, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)

Your website
Here are some errors on your website: Glad to be of help --Jawr256 July 1, 2005 10:00 (UTC)
 * The TV movie is commonly known as Doctor Who (Enemy Within)
 * The Fourth Doctor has been spelt wrong on your main page.

Doctor Who: Daleks
Hi, and welcome to the WikiProject. I turned this article into a redirect because the boxed tin isn't really notable enough to warrant an article on its own - all the information needed to know about it is already in the notes section of the respective story articles. To be honest, the article as it stood wouldn't have survived a vote for deletion. Do read the WikiProject page and a look at the other articles in the project to get a feel for what subjects deserve seperate treatment and what don't. Do keep contributing, and welcome again! --khaosworks 22:34, July 13, 2005 (UTC)

Website
This section has been moved to User:Mollsmolyneux/Website

Dads Army table
The table is on User:Jawr256/Sandbox/Carnival of Monsters

dads-army-stub
The usual minimum the Stub Sorting project like to see is 60 stubs, and while the potential exists for more than sixty articles, it's not there yet. See the proposal page for the rest of my opinion about the stub. Caerwine 20:18, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

Incomplete episodes redesign
Hi, got your message. The only question I have is perhaps to rephrase the line "Not a second of footage survives" (perhaps reduce it to "no footage survives"), but I'll wait and see what the others say first. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 01:38, 12 November 2005 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure whether the table is an improvement in this case or not. How to use tables suggests that in many circumstances, it's better to leave a list as a list.  I don't feel strongly about it, but my inclination is that this is one of those cases.  But if other people think the table is better, I won't object.  (Oh, and one insignificant note: you've misspelled "starring" as "staring".  If you do end up putting the table on the page, you probably want to fix that.)


 * All that said, I like the initiative you've shown in doing this. See you around the 'pedia! —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 06:25, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

Except for the comments made above re:wording (which can always be changed afterwards), I think the chart looks OK. The "prettytable" format, however, I find is more pleasing to the eye and is the one I generally use myself (see, for example, The Saint (TV series)). Also, I noted not all the information from the list has been transferred over, particularly in the Pertwee list. Cheers! 23skidoo 14:56, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

Definitely a candidate for a table instead of a list— should be three tables though and would be better with pretty table. GraemeLeggett

The revisions look good. My only suggestion is that the Pertwee table needs to be preceded by a sentence or two explaining that, while all Pertwee stores are complete, a number of them exist in only B&W prints (some of which were later colorized by the BBC for home video release). The last "lost" Pertwee episode was the first episode of "Invasion of the Dinosaurs" which was only rediscovered in the early 1990s. Also, it should be noted somewhere in the article most (if not all) of the missing Hartnell and Troughton stories exist in audio form, and "telesnaps" also exist of most of the missing stories as well. Other than all that, I think it's ready to go. 23skidoo 16:09, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

Great work :) --TimPope 18:29, 15 November 2005 (UTC)