User talk:Molly.anderson0110

Welcome!
Hi Molly.anderson0110! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Drmies (talk) 15:11, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Emma Lahana. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:49, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Halston Sage, you may be blocked from editing. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:54, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Erin Sanders. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:01, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at We're the Millers. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:20, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Nick Moyes (talk) 15:57, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I just wanted to drop by to explain that I have blocked you for a couple of days so that you stop damaging articles and wasting other editors time by having to fix them. This is becoming disruptive. You have been warned a number of times about your mis-use of 'rowspan', and I want you to consider how some of these edits have damaged the tables you've been editing and have made them confusing to interpret. When your block expires, please also start using WP:EDITSUMMARIES to explain the edits you are making to articles, so other editors can determine what you are doing,a nd whether you are being intentionally disruptive, or simply misguided in your editing, per WP:CIR. Previewing the changes that you make from now on is also an important element of checking your work is OK if you want to be sure you do not get blocked again. Thanks, Nick Moyes (talk) 16:05, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Two things to add: 1) Definitely don't go back to articles where you have already been reverted and simply repeat the edit – this is both Disruptive editing and potentially Edit warring. 2) Nearly all of your edits so far have been simply "cosmetic" rather than substantive – if you don't want other editors to be suspicious of your intentions, you need to start making some substantive edits. Your final edit to Isn't It Romantic was on the right track, though it was completely lacking in sourcing which was a problem. If you really want to constructively contribute to the project, edits like that (but with sources), or even just adding sources, would be far more helpful than what you've been doing. I would suggest leaving the "cosmetic" editing of tables behind you, and move on to more substantive article improvement, if you want to have a long editing time on Wikipedia. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:24, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Becky G, you may be blocked from editing. Resumed same actions that lead to last block Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Nick Moyes (talk) 19:07, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello, Molly Anderson. I am disappointed to have to withdraw you editing privileges a second time, so soon after your last block expired, and for precisely the same reasons. Other editors are finding you non-substantive edits to tables (and specifically the use of rowspan) disruptive, and are constantly having to revert you. You would be welcome to make more substantive edits to articles, providing you back them up with citations, and summarise the rationale for your edits with an EDITSUMMARY. But you seem disinclined to do that. I, or another admin, will gladly unblock you if you submit a formal request here, showing you understand why you have been blocked and undertaking to change your editing behaviour. If that doesn't happen, you block will sadly remain and may be extended if that editing pattern continues.  Regrtefully, Nick Moyes (talk) 19:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Abigail Breslin. ''Improper rowspan on tables exactly as before that lead to your last blocks. Resumed immediately doing same.'' Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:34, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 17:35, 29 December 2020 (UTC)