User talk:Mollyhover

Speedy deletion nomination of Upstream Research


A tag has been placed on Upstream Research requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Nördic  Nightfury  10:40, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Upstream Reports


The article Upstream Reports has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Subject fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Winner 42 Talk to me!  01:22, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Upstream Reports
Hello, Mollyhover,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Upstream Reports should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Upstream Reports.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Meatsgains (talk) 23:02, 26 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Please keep to mind you must comply with our non-negotiable policies WP:What Wikipedia is not and WP:Paid which importantly note what we expect, especially when it comes to articles. SwisterTwister   talk  22:32, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of A New Brand World
Hello Mollyhover,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged A New Brand World for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

John from Idegon (talk) 00:07, 17 March 2018 (UTC)