User talk:Moltenriches

Hans Teeuwen
Because a video is in this regard not a reliable source. How do you know if it wasn't part of the act? Just hypothetical of course. Just find a wp:reliable source for this info. A newspaper review or something like that. Also, if you post a message, please post in in my talk page at User talk:Garion96, you posted it at User:Garion96 which is why I did not saw it for so long. Garion96 (talk) 20:43, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I concur with this. Please stop adding your youtube references as a source for controversial claims. Vandalism will be reported next time. I'm sure it won't be necessary to let it come to that. Happy wikiing. Kweniston (talk) 00:35, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

I reverted your edit, once again. Your 'contribution' is a non-encyclopedic fact, as well as being bases on youtube as a source. Thus it has no place on this encyclopedia. Please realize this is not a gossip glossy. If you can't stop from adding this, I will report this and I think the result won't be in your favor. It's up to you. Greets, Kweniston (talk) 16:59, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * As stated above, please find a reliable source. If he was booed off (and it was important enough) I assume there are some sources about this. Regarding your other comment, nope, I never heard of the guy before the article ended up in my watchlist for some reason. I probably had a reason, but don't remember it at least. Garion96 (talk) 17:59, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I just read Moltenriches youtube comments on the aforementioned clip, they are absolutely not resemblant of the attitude that is necessary for building an encyclopedia. And as much as you think Garion69 is a 'fan' of Teeuwen, which is not the case, the same can be said of you: are you a Teeuwenbasher? Please reread the comments made here and the introduction links above: Wikipedia is something else than a newssite or gossip corner. Kweniston (talk) 19:02, 21 October 2008 (UTC)