User talk:Momoparadize

Welcome!
Hi Momoparadize! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:05, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laura Huang (November 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Laura Huang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Laura_Huang Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Timtrent&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Laura_Huang reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:25, 15 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello there, could you guide me hoe to make my article passing the review ? I think my article meets all criteria that mentioned. Momoparadize (talk) 08:01, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
 * On my Wikipedia Commons talk page you asked for guidance. The guidance is above, with links, or below, without them.
 * This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to
 * meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
 * or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
 * Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. :If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 * When a draft is declined you need to read and understand the reason. Yiu may wish to follow the pre-filled link to the Articles for Creation Help Desk. I am willing to offer guidance one you conform to me that you have read and understood the reason for declining this. I am unlikely to see a message on your talk page, so I suggest you use mine to leave me a message. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:04, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Momoparadize/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Momoparadize/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Eagleash&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Momoparadize/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 09:51, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Momoparadize/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Momoparadize/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Momoparadize/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:16, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Momoparadize. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. ''This is with regards to your drafts on Laura Huang. --'' DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:18, 15 November 2022 (UTC)


 * I would like to disclose that I do not have COI regarding editing Laura Huang page. I am not a paid editor, affiliate, nor having any interest relates to Laura Huang. I am not working in the same organization with Laura Huang. Momoparadize (talk) 10:58, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 15)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Momoparadize/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Again, this is a duplicate of Draft:Laura Huang. Moreover, this has been resubmitted without any improvement.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:51, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Important
Firstly, please do not submit multiple copies of your drafts for review; I told you already. This does not improve the chances of the draft being accepted, quite the opposite.

Secondly, do not resubmit declined drafts without making any improvements. This can result in the draft being rejected outright, which is what I have just done (see above).

Thirdly, please respond to the COI query I posted here a moment ago. Kindly do so before editing further. Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:54, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laura Huang (November 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Laura Huang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Laura_Huang Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Laura_Huang reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:12, 15 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi, thank you for your feedback.
 * However, here are the few things that I feel confused.
 * (1)Sources citation
 * Most of the source cited in the page are primary and from academy journals, including “Administrative Science Quarterly”, “Academy of Management Journal”, “Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences”.
 * (2)Establish Notability
 * I believe these Awards and Achievement should be considered as “notable”
 * 2020, Winner of the National Academy of Sciences, Cozzarelli Prize
 * 2019, Winner of the Academy of Management Journal
 * 2016, Kauffman Foundation Junior Faculty Fellowship
 * If there is a concern of The Poets & Quants piece, it can be removed.
 * (3)Associated professors are not inherently notable per WP:PROF
 * Regarding this issue, should I change the category from “Biography” to “Others” in order to meet the criteria? Momoparadize (talk) 01:54, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi,
 * I don't know if you don't read the various notices and comments, or you do, but you simply wish to argue beside them; in any case, I will try to answer again the key points:
 * The very first thing you need to do is respond to the COI query (see 'Managing a conflict of interest', above), before you get potentially blocked. You need to explain what your relationship with the subject is. If you have no relationship whatsoever, ie. you've never been in any contact with her, haven't worked for the same organisation, etc., then you need to expressly state that. Thank you.
 * With regards to your point (1)Sources citation, yes indeed, many of the sources cited are primary, that was my point precisely. Primary sources cannot be used to establish notability per WP:GNG, which is the problem here. Works the person has authored may indirectly give rise to notability, if they are of such magnitude that they make the person particularly noteworthy in their area, but simply authoring a lot of papers does not show notability.
 * With regards to your point (2)Establish Notability, these awards etc. may or may not be notable (I would argue not: you cannot claim that eg. the Cozzarelli Prize is notable in Wikipedia terms, if it doesn't have a Wikipedia article), but even if they are, that doesn't necessarily make a recipient of such awards notable. It is true that in WP:NACADEMIC #2, there is a provision for notability based on a "highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level", but that refers to the likes of the Fields Medal etc., and others of similar standing, which would almost certainly then also have their own Wikipedia articles.
 * With regards to your point (3)Associated professors are not inherently notable per WP:PROF, it doesn't matter in the slightest which draft category this is in, and in any case BLP (biography of a living person) is the correct one.
 * In conclusion, the reason why this draft has not been accepted is lack of notability. Either you must show that by citing multiple sources that meet the WP:GNG criteria; or you demonstrate that the person meets, clearly and unequivocally, one or more of the eight criteria in WP:NACADEMIC.
 * Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:49, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi there,
 * Thank you so much for replying and guiding me. First time to create a page, so your guidance is really helpful. I already responded to the COI query, will keep fixing the issue you mentioned above. Thanks again. Momoparadize (talk) 11:20, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Laura Huang
Hello, Momoparadize. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Laura Huang, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 2 July 2023 (UTC)