User talk:Momos

Welcome
Thank you for your interest in the NYC transportation and Taxicabs articles. However, please take some time to read Consensus. Since you wish to change the status quo the way that we do things is to talk first and implement second and then only once concensus is reached. No matter how strongly you believe that your changes have improved the Project they are but your view. On the talk pages both our arguments are there - please wait and see what other views emerge. If you try to force through the changes that you seek without concensus that is known as 'edit warring' and you will rapidly lose the sympathy of the Community. OTOH if you take things more slowly, and seek concensus, you will find that editors are only too pleased to help.

To show willing, and in an effort to compromise, I have replaced the NYC section with the text from your separate page with the exception of 'Semi-formal' which is more suited to the transportation article. TerriersFan 18:48, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

"FAC page"
I was referring to Featured article candidates/New York City, where someone remarked:


 * The lead (introduction) section isn't quite satisfactory in my opinion

and


 * Main issue is the lead. It does not seem to adequately summarize the article.

After I made my extensive addition to the lead, it got these responses:


 * Looking MUCH better.

and


 * The lead now looks adequate, and the article as a whole looks great.

It would not be beyond me to suggest that it won featured status in part because of the lead, and now you have pruned it immediately after it got upgraded. At the very least, you need to discuss this on the talk page before you prune it to where it was when people were complaining about it and voting against featuring it because of it. --Golbez 01:12, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

New York City Transportation
Hello, I am now concerned with what appears to be an article which you have put much input into. I am going to be honest with you, in that both the structure, format, as well as the citations you used will need some work. However, that is why I am now talking to you about this. If it is agreeable to you, I am going to do some major reorganization in your article - some sections will be moved around, more information will be added, and most directly, I will do quite a bit of proofreading of the grammer. Please see my Userpage and especially talk page so we can communicate. The article is indeed a very good article, however, and it appears the work of many hours; the sheer number of citations impress me as well. Peter 20:50, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations!
Congratulations! Your image Image:Municipal Building - New York City.jpg was the random picture of the day for October 21, 2007. It looked like this:. Again, Congratulations! - Presidentman (talk) Random Picture of the Day 12:12, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Oyster_Bar_brightened.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Oyster_Bar_brightened.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Nv8200p talk 16:05, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

New York City GAR
New York City, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AIR corn (talk) 02:37, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)