User talk:Momotaro

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! RJFJR 17:50, July 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

SUL
I am currently merging this into a unified login. --Momotaro (talk) 14:44, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi. Your SUL request was done at th wiki. --Lerdsuwa (talk) 02:47, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you! --Momotaro (talk) 13:55, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Redirects?
Why create multiple redirects for place names? Surely they already exist? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter Robinson Scott (talk • contribs) 12:51, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I created the redirects because "redirects are cheap", and because I wanted to fix some red links from WP:WikiProject_Red_Link_Recovery/Punctuation. Certainly I could change the links in the individual articles, but creating a redirect will avoid the problem for the future. If someone again links to Newport (Rhode Island) instead of Newport, Rhode Island, the link will work.
 * However, if a redirect would be a very unlikely target, or plainly wrong, I will not create it and change the link instead. --Momotaro (talk) 13:01, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Unimodular form


The article Unimodular form has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Proposed for deletion as WP:DICDEF.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tyrenon (talk) 07:38, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Hand-coding
Hey all :).

I'm dropping you a note because you've been involved in dealing with feedback from the Article Feedback Tool. To get a better handle on the overall quality of comments now that the tool has become a more established part of the reader experience, we're undertaking a round of hand coding - basically, taking a sample of feedback and marking each piece as inappropriate, helpful, so on - and would like anyone interested in improving the tool to participate :).

You can code as many or as few pieces of feedback as you want: this page should explain how to use the system, and there is a demo here. Once you're comfortable with the task, just drop me an email at and I'll set you up with an account :).

If you'd like to chat with us about the research, or want live tutoring on the software, there will be an office hours session on Monday 17 December at 23:00 UTC in. Hope to see some of you there! Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:20, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Exact couple for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Exact couple is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Exact couple until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Sandstein  20:54, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

A question
Hi. Back in year 2008, you edited the page Weierstrass p; you virtually created that page. I'm afraid I'm not sure about its accuracy. Could you have a look at Talk:Weierstrass p? Thanks. --Teika kazura (talk) 22:46, 2 August 2017 (UTC)