User talk:Momrockzz

Zeeshan Khan
Please note that disambiguation pages like Zeeshan Khan are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:


 * Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
 * Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
 * Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
 * Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
 * Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
 * Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory
 * Do not add articles to acronym or initials disambiguation pages unless the person or entity is widely known by that name (in which case it should be stated in the linked article).

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 23:41, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Salina Prakash (actress), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Star One ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Salina_Prakash_%28actress%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Salina_Prakash_%28actress%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:13, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Swarda Thigale(actress)


A tag has been placed on Swarda Thigale(actress) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Swarda Thigale. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 19:42, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Some advice
You've probably had this pointed out to you before, but you really should read the Wikipedia blocking policy. YOU, the person behind the account are blocked, not just the account. Creating new accounts over and over as you've done is just block evasion, often called sockpuppetry. When you create a new account, you aren't really helping anyone as you're ignoring the reasons behind your original block. As a sock of a blocked editor, all of your edits can be reverted, and all articles you've created can be speedily deleted. YOU, the person behind the account, are not welcome on Wikipedia because of the disruption and problems you originally caused. Your chance of ever being unblocked are pretty low at this point given everything, but your only hope to return to editing as a normal editor is the standard offer. Read it.  Ravensfire  (talk) 00:50, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Request for avoiding the speedy deletion of Diaan Talaviya, Jiaa Shankar and Aditi Sharma (actress)I Aditi Sharma
Respected Wikipedia admin members, I really don't know the reason for categorising me as a sock puppet of User:Shiwam Kumar Shrivastav and blocking my account. But, I assure you Sir, as a wikipedia editor I've never disobeyed any wikipedia rules or guidelines and whenever I have got a warning message, I have done the neede to the demands whatever the admin member had had asked me to do. Regarding the creation of Swarda Thigale, i had only created her account because I had been a great fan of hers from her show Savitri Devi College & Hospital. You can verify all my edits where i used to give summary for every edits and made every edit while respecting wikipedia rules. If you still feel, I've disrupted the wikipedia edits with my editing, I will not give any more reasons to gets unblocked, but I request you to revert me to standard editing after six months. Finally, the main reason of this message is to humbly request the wikipedia admin to not delete the remaining 3 wiki pages I've created. As wikipedia admin, you all would yourself know, what kind of hard work and resources are required to create a wikipedia page which meets all the demands of wikipedia. And, I believe, there is a lot of contribution of my effots, my hard work and my time which were exploited to create these pages and to edit the wiki pages. So, please, kindly do not delete the 3 wiki pages only because i'm being suspected as sock puppet of User:Shiwam Kumar Shrivastav. --Momrockzz (talk) 03:23, 15 November 2019 (UTC)


 * You're blocked as a sockpuppet of a blocked editor notorious for creating socks, deception and poor editing. You have zero moral authority to ask anything, don't respect Wikipedia policies and frankly aren't welcome on Wikipedia because of your own actions. Think on that.  Ravensfire  (talk) 14:15, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

To hell with Wikipedia
Well thanks a lot for that piece of information. I don't give a damn whether I'm allowed to edit anymore, I've already achieved what I wanted by hook and by crook, and you could never stop that, i don't want anything else too, so I don't have to be a wiki editor anymore, got that you useless admin of wikipedia, so go to hell User:Ravensfire.

Goodbye!!!

--Momrockzz (talk) 06:20, 16 November 2019 (UTC)