User talk:Mona.SHEPHERD

April 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Neville Maxwell, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have turned Neville Maxwell and Henderson Brooks–Bhagat Report into attack pages against the author. Zanhe (talk) 13:19, 8 April 2014 (UTC)


 * You have breached every rule of objectivity through your mass deletions in order to present Neville Maxwell in highly favorable light. You even removed a host of weighty citations. This is a classic case of a blatant violation of the WP:BLP policy. You obviously have some connection to Maxwell. Yet, you have the temerity to accuse me of "disruptive editing." Your mutilations speak for themselves! -Mona.SHEPHERD (talk)
 * In my view, has the matter pretty much correct, and has done a good job analyzing the shortcomings of the content that  had tried to add.The "weighty citations" do not support the statements,  or the tone and tenor of the additions. I see no basis for accusing a highly experienced editor like Zanhe of a connection to the subject. As for me, I never heard of the subject until yesterday, so have no connection whatsoever. These reversions were not "mutilations" as this is a routine content dispute in this collaborative encyclopedia. Any additions will be as the result of consensus, and I oppose what Mona.SHEPHERD has previously written. Please suggest only additions written from the neutral point of view, and fully backed by references.  Cullen 328   Let's discuss it  17:21, 11 April 2014 (UTC)