User talk:MonaCaterina

December 2014
Hello, I'm Escape Orbit. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Speculations about Mona Lisa, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Escape Orbit (Talk) 21:13, 18 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Kempler's theory is a reliable source. See POTD 22 October 2013. Self published website is the best source for his theory. MonaCaterina (talk) 05:41, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 * A self published web site is worthless to Wikipedia as a source for his theory. -- Escape Orbit  (Talk) 17:50, 21 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Pictures don't make you a reliable source. We don't use comments on newspaper or encyclopedia articles. And finally, the constant sock puppetry has meant that it is even less likely Kempler's ideas will ever be included here. Of course you can ask at WP:RSN. Dougweller (talk) 19:14, 20 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Kempler's theory (TXu 1-812-842, TXu 1-857-507, TXu 1-906-294) is a reliable source not because of his pictures. Kempler's theory is actually the truth. Those highly knowledgeable in the arts understand that his theory is indeed the truth. I think it doesn't really matter where it was published. The user Relpmek made mistakes because he didn't know all the rules and the unwritten rules here. In addition this was a new theory here and he had many difficulties. My suggestion is forget the past and think of the Mona Lisa. MonaCaterina (talk) 18:50, 21 December 2014 (UTC)