User talk:Monaagholami

Unhelpful edits
With astonishing assiduity, you have made swathes of edits that numerous editors have since spent time reverting or correcting. In many of these edits you changed the correct spelling of less usual words to the spelling of more usual words that mean something quite different ("a ward" is one thing; "award" is something else; a "ploye" and a "ploy" are two entirely different things; etc.). You have also changed standard English spellings in articles about British and Australian people to match American usage (e.g. changing "programme" to "program"), when Wikipedia normally respects the English of the subjects. Until you develop the competence to distinguish between familiar and less common words, and between standard varieties of English around the world, it would be more helpful not to make any spelling "corrections". --Andreas Philopater (talk) 07:22, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Commas
When it comes to commas, the use of a serial comma in English is not obligatory (and is not always desirable). When used, there should be no space before the comma: unlike in some other languages, punctuation in English follows directly on from the last letter of the previous word. --13:19, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Your editing continues to be disruptive. For every one constructive edit, you make at least seven that are unconstructive. You violate WP:OLINK, you put spaces before commas (see above on that issue), you change quotations, you do unnecessary edits that effectively change nothing, and the list goes on. Plus, you make many small edits in a row, mark them all as minor, and never use edit summaries. You do all this relatively rapidly for an allegedly new user, and it makes them very hard to review. You also have failed to respond to the comments above, even though collaboration with other users is required on Wikipedia. If you continue in this way, you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:34, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 13:23, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * If after this block expires you continue in the same vein, the next block will be indefinite.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:24, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vira ertebatat parspouya


A tag has been placed on Vira ertebatat parspouya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Kazamzam (talk) 14:32, 3 September 2021 (UTC)