User talk:MonarchOfTerror/Archive 1

Welcome!
Hi MonarchOfTerror! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 18:03, 1 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi Fake, thanks for welcoming me. I hope that I can continue to contribute to this great project! Scientia potentia est, -Monarch OfTerror  (talk) 14:08, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Just seeing this now, and I'm sure that you will be! Did you take inspiration for the Latin phrase from me? Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 02:45, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Yeah, while Scientia potentia est has always been one of my biggest personal mottos for me, I was inspired by you to actually include it in my signature. Latin is very cool after all! Scientia potentia est, -Monarch OfTerror  (talk) 02:47, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arthur Yorinks (August 27)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arthur Yorinks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Arthur_Yorinks Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Qcne&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Arthur_Yorinks reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Qcne  (talk)  16:08, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arthur Yorinks has been accepted
 Arthur Yorinks, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Arthur_Yorinks help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing!  Qcne  (talk)  17:49, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

So you like to add fake Narrative? Without research.
Why did you messed with my corrected Information in Initiation of Sikh women on the Khalsa Page. 117.242.32.37 (talk) 13:26, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

ITN/C closure of "Danilo Cavalcante capture"
Hi! You recently closed the WP:ITN/C proposal for the capture of Danilo Cavalcante as a WP:SNOW close, although the only argument was the lack of the target article being linked in the blurb. Would it be okay if someone renominated the blurb properly by linking to the target article (which has seen a lot of expansion these last few days since the event), or is there a prejudice against renomination simply because the first one wasn't done "correctly"? Chaotic Enby ( talk ) 00:15, 14 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Oh there’s no such thing as prejudice or something. In fact I intended my close in the first case to be a softer close. If someone wants to reopen the nomination with improvements, feel free! I doubt it will get consensus to post on notability either, but I’m not gonna stop anyone from trying :) Scientia potentia est, Monarch  OfTerror  05:02, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot! I wasn't necessarily 100% on board myself due to notability, I was more wondering about how the process worked! Thanks a lot!!! Chaotic Enby  ( talk ) 12:42, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

No Nut November
Sorry if I stepped on your user warning. Twinkle does not warn you when you edit conflict on an article undo., Meters (talk) 19:49, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Hmm... that's not Twinkle, that's just the undo button... Meters (talk) 19:51, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
 * No problem. The problematic edits got reverted and the editor got warned in the end so it's fine, all's well that ends well! Scientia potentia est, Monarch  OfTerror  19:51, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Arthur Yorinks
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Precious
You are recipient no. 2886 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:23, 12 October 2023 (UTC)


 * @Gerda Arendt Thanks for this, I appreciate it! Scientia potentia est, Monarch  OfTerror  07:37, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Agyemang Diawusie
Thank you for your ITN work! - Today, I have a special story to tell, of the works of a musician born 300 years ago. - I wish you a good festive season and a peaceful New Year! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:46, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Thank you!
Hey, MOT. I've been away for the past few months due to some personal reasons (and other reasons too), and I have been lurking on ITNC sometimes to see you being a productive and helpful member of Wikipedia. I am proud to have been the first person to introduce you on Wikipedia that July, and I am so glad that it led to you being you. :) Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 00:46, 4 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey Fake, I've also been editing a bit on and off the past few months as well mainly due to school, but I continue to contribute whenever I can. I find a lot of meaning in the project, and your friendly attitude has been an inspiration. Thank you for welcoming me way back then! Scientia potentia est, Monarch  OfTerror  21:55, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Where we've been, Where we go from here (March 12)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Randompersonediting was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Where we've been, Where we go from here and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Where_we%27ve_been,_Where_we_go_from_here Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Randompersonediting&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Where_we%27ve_been,_Where_we_go_from_here reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

K-Pop contributor (✍️•📚) 10:14, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Where we've been, Where we go from here has been accepted
 Where we've been, Where we go from here, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Where_we%27ve_been,_Where_we_go_from_here help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Atlantic306 (talk) 23:26, 26 March 2024 (UTC)