User talk:Money Man 327

Hi! Where did you find the information about states that you used for your edit at List of U.S. states by the number of billionaires? I can't find any information about the state, only the country. 05:09, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi Sjö if your wondering where i found the information on list of U.S.states by number of billionaires. I found the information by looking for number of billionaires by states 2014 and saw an article on Forbes that says california leads with 111 billionaires you click on that and it shows the number of billionaires by state. Hope it helps. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Money Man 327 (talk • contribs)


 * Actually, no. Could you add the link? An unnamed article somewhere on Forbes isn't really a reliable source, which is required on Wikipedia. Sjö (talk) 06:17, 8 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Sure here it is check it out and let me know if its what your looking for. http://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2014/03/07/california-leads-all-states-and-all-but-2-countries-with-111-billionaires/


 * Thanks. I added it as a reference to the article. Sjö (talk) 06:30, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

No problem.

Human height
Would you kindly stop edit warring at human height. These amounts should not be the records for height as the words 'over' and 'under' appear before them.--Gibson Flying V (talk) 22:16, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Gibson Flying V i was putting what human height has averaged from using the worlds smallest man and tallest man in history. Trying to get the best information helps the person looking it up. Us editors try to work on it do we not? Now I know u may have your sources but so do i and i try to implement them into this article. So all I'm asking from you Gibson is to plz give my edits a chance to get out there for people's interest. So let us editors just try to change things up a bit. Send a message if u agree or disagree and we'll try to work it out without edit warring which is pretty stupid.
 * It is inaccurate to say that "Human height has varied .." - children could be much smaller than that. Materialscientist (talk) 05:28, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Material scientist I'm doing the heights of the worlds smallest man and tallest man in history i tried to cite my sources as proof.Plz let me keep my edits which is informational check out my sources and tell me If im wrong on my info. Btw I see your point on Adult human so i completely agree with that edit.

Worlds tallest man ever http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/records-3000/tallest-man-ever/

Worlds smallest man ever http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/news/2012/2/shortest-man-world-record-its-official!-chandra-bahadur-dangi-is-smallest-adult-of-all-time/
 * Wrong. The second link is for smallest adult, not smallest human. Materialscientist (talk) 06:07, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Material scientist i wasn't trying to prove he was the smallest human being if you had figured out what i was trying to prove in the second article is that the 2 ft you put in is completely wrong.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Human height. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.--Gibson Flying V (talk) 07:11, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Ok Gibson i will no longer edit the human height but for the record look at these 2 sources and tell me if the 2ft and 8ft 6 is right

http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/records-3000/tallest-man-ever/

http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/news/2012/2/shortest-man-world-record-its-official!-chandra-bahadur-dangi-is-smallest-adult-of-all-time/.

This proves my edits are right and are not vandalism as you claim.So you and material scientist are the ones putting unreliable information.btw where did you get your information?

Kindly request to stop introducing factual errors to the Human height article. Materialscientist (talk) 07:03, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Material scientist leave my edits alone i gave you all the proof, your scared that I was right and you were wrong. Your informations is so stupid that its possibly the most stupid information I've ever seen in my life you may have 400,000 edits but probably all that was you adding stupid information.Btw your information is soo wrong that a bot even said you were vandalizing this page so leave it the hell alone and go find another page to vandalize with Gibson Flying V.
 * Given my recent topic ban proposal, and the rationale used for it, I wouldn't be at all surprised if this is in fact an experienced editor masquerading as a new editor.--Gibson Flying V (talk) 11:50, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Well thanks Gibson for calling me a experienced editor but I'm a new editor trying to learn the ropes i barley know what all the code is needed in a article. But one thing that makes me kinda experienced is i research a lot and know a lot of sources so all i wanted was to show you that theres no way 2ft is the smallest as you put it same with 8ft 6 cause there was someone who was 8 ft 11 and I'm following the Wikipedia policy which is to help edit pages and put reliable sources which I was doing so keep looking at my sources and think in your head that you were wrong and I was right at the info which you cant beat I barely change anything in this article except the numbers now and yet you change them which is stupid cause its numbers."In war there are no winners". So lets end this stupid thing and go back to editing articles.I know every editor is gonna disagree on stuff that other editors add but unless they look up the information before challenging it so that everyone's happy and theres no edit wars. So Gibson all i want is for you and material scientist to keep my numbers the same and you'll never see me again on that page ever. Send a message if you agree or disagree plz agree so we can end this dispute cause its so damn stupid. You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 23:58, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Respond materiel scientist so we can talk plz.