User talk:Moneytrees/Archive 21

Unblocking
Hi, Moneytrees, Hope you're fine! I've created an article in draft. And in this article, nothing I've copied from sources. This is the reply of this. Thanks. ➤ Tajwar.thesuperman  Talk 08:20, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Thank you so much for you decline reason in my talk page. I'll try my best to make good edits in Draftspace. Thanks! — Tajwar.thesuperman Talk • Contributions 18:27, 29 September 2021 (UTC)


 * @Moneytrees: Hi. Sorry for disturb you. I've also made another article, Draft:Pritilata. Thanks — Tajwar.thesuperman Talk • Contributions 11:17, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi. Can I do this, reported that "--"? Thanks. — Tajwar.thesuperman Talk • Contributions 13:02, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
 * @Tajwar.thesuperman Sorry for the lack of responses, I've been busy with work recently. To be clear, I won't review (as in accept/decline) drafts upon request, but I will help point out issues with regards to how they are written and possible copyright problems. Looking at Draft:Pritilata, aside from some spelling and phrasing issues that I think you're aware of (and if you're not sure what I'm exactly referring to, please ask and I can explain), I see an issue with parts like "Then, at the age of 21, Pritilata committed suicide by consuming cyanide kept by herself to avoid responsibility by British police." The source says; "To evade arrest, she took potassium cyanide and ended her life only at the age of 21." To avoid phrasing the text too closely to the source and improve the phrasing of the sentence in general, I would say something along the lines of "To avoid apprehension, she killed herself by ingesting potassium cyanide." The bit about her age doesn't need to be mentioned, since it's not really relevant to her death- that can be mentioned elsewhere in the article, but it's not needed near that sentence. A good way to avoid wording too similar to the source is removing details that aren't directly relevant- that will make summarizing what is important easier. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 04:36, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Oh! I'm sorry. I gave some word of the part from another source. I forgot to cite it. I will cite it soon. Thanks. — Tajwar.thesuperman Talk • Contributions 04:47, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Copyvios at Calon Lân
I've just removed a few fairly obvious infrigements, see history, and I notice you were also involved with removing such infrigements here, but the wrong edits seem to have been redacted... The whole article probably needs a fairly thorough revdel; at least as far back as 2013, where a copyvio is already included... Thanks, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 17:37, 3 October 2021 (UTC)


 * @RandomCanadian, it went back to 2007 as far as I can tell. In that edit, the ip adds "Alternative Translation in rhyme ( by permission of author Malcolm Cowen )", but we can't accept it per WP:DONATETEXT, so I revdeled it all up. Thanks for removing it all Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide  06:05, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

user:205.126.90.19
IP has just come off a 31 hour ban and started disruptive editing on the same topic it was banned from Equine-man (talk) 20:30, 7 October 2021 (UTC)


 * @Equine-man Yes, and if it vandalizes further I will block it. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 20:32, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
 * thank you Equine-man (talk) 20:35, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Request for unblocking
Hi. You blocked me from mainspace on 26 September 2021. I'm here to ask you that can I be unblocked from mainspace? I've created some drafts. You can see these. Thanks. ||  Tajwar.thesuperman   💬  11:00, 9 October 2021 (UTC)


 * @Tajwar.thesuperman I haven't seen any recent copyvios in your drafts, so I would be open to unblocking you given that the block was for copyright violations. However, I recommend being very careful in making edits to article space, and sticking to article creations in Draft space, so other editors can review your work. In particular I have an issue with your inclusion of "Criticism" sections in your articles like Draft:Dhaka 2040 and Draft:Shabaash Mithu; the events you list there don't really fall under the definition of "criticism", they more seem like things that happened during film production. Instead of putting them in their own section, those details could be incorporated into different parts of the article. So although you have fixed your issues with copyright, you still have some other issues relating to how your articles are written that editors may have a problem with. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 22:59, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay! I'll incorporate those details into different parts of article. Thank you! ||   Tajwar.thesuperman   💬  04:26, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Aid A – Aid for Artists in Exile
Please allow me to make changes again

It is a non-profit organization that helps tortured artists in exile so that their art does not stop. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AMIRNAGHSHI (talk • contribs) 08:20, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Request for unblock appeal to be granted
I apologize and (now more fully) understand why I was blocked for copyright violations. All of my copyright violations were in relation to the addition of images (mostly to arts or artist pages). I vow never to add another image to Wikipedia if you will lift the block on my account. And obviously I will avoid any other copyright violations. I feel I have more to contribute and don't at all mind simply not involving myself with any issues relating to imagery, the inclusion of imagery, etc. No images whatsoever--no problem. And I would thank you for the opportunity. Gratitude you for your time and consideration in this matter.

ThomasMikael (talk) 20:33, 13 October 2021 (UTC)ThomasMikael

Help
Hi. Hope you're fine. You partially blocked me. And unblocked on 10 October 2021. I need a help. How can you find pages with copyright infringement? I mean is there any tool? Or any special pages where copyrighted pages found? I want to be a member of WikiProject Copyright Cleanup. Thanks. ||  Orbit Wharf   💬  12:11, 13 October 2021 (UTC)


 * @Orbit Wharf I appreciate the offer for help (we definitely need it) but I think you should wait for a decent amount of time before you get into the area- you only just got unblocked for copyright violations... Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 04:42, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah. I'm waiting... ||   Orbit Wharf   💬  04:56, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * @Heythereimaguy Well, thank you! Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 05:48, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

You keep editing my edits
The Great Reset is a COMMUNIST attempt to create chaos in the United States. Anyone with a brain that has not been brainwashed by the shadow government is aware of this attempt. Stop changing my edit to your article about the great reset. You are endangering our once free nation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.99.137.163 (talk) 18:22, 19 October 2021 (UTC)


 * I don't know what you're talking about and I don't really care, but I see you have continued to vandalize, so I have blocked you, sadly. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 18:31, 19 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Oh man, these editors never fail to make me laugh. Signed, The4lines &#124;&#124;&#124;&#124; (Talk) (Contributions) 22:43, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

For info
Hi Moneytrees - hope you are well. I've just spotted that a "new" user Orbit Wharf. A quick look through the log history shows they were previously known as Tajwar.thesuperman. Their (un)block log has your comment of "I strongly recommend you keep your article creations in draftspace" for their latest block. I don't know if there's anything amiss with their edits, or they are trying to evade scrutiny, but they've created pages like this and this. It might be nothing, but going off their past history, I thought I'd flag it up. Thanks.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 15:17, 23 October 2021 (UTC)


 * I've changed my username. from, Orbit Wharf  💬•📝 15:54, 23 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Hey! I can also tell that you're harassing me. Because now my creating pages havent no copyrighted text. And you complaining it to Moneytrees. Why? And you're telling about mine. That is completely harrassment! regards, Orbit Wharf   💬•📝 16:35, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I was away for the weekend. @Orbit Wharf Lugnuts is not harassing you in any way, he is following up with me as I am an admin who has previously interacted with you. Please refer back to my conversations with you at User talk:Moneytrees/Archive 21 and User talk:Moneytrees/Archive 21. Just because you are clear when it comes to copyright issues does not mean other issues with your edits go away. I still think you have a ways to go when it comes to writing and sourcing, so you should stick to draftspace and learn from there. If you don't do this, you will attract the attention of users and admins who probably won't be as nice as I'm being. If you continue creating articles like the provided examples, and continue to shut down warnings like you have been, you will end up blocked again and it will be much harder to appeal. Didn't I tell you about that in your first unblock appeal? And please, don't ever remove sections like this from another user's talk ever again. You're lucky I didn't block you for that alone. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 16:15, 25 October 2021 (UTC)


 * So when I can create articles on mainspace? regards, Orbit Wharf   💬undefined📝 17:14, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * @Orbit Wharf Until editors aren't having issues with your creations, which will take a few months. For one, you are rushing too much, and the quality of your articles is suffering. If you don't have time to finish your article, then keep it in draftspace. For two, you are still learning how to write articles well. Like I said earlier, it is best if you keep your article creations in draft space, so others can review errors and you won't risk getting a block- which you are now risking, as you have annoyed several users and are trying to charge back into mainspace. Patience is required. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 18:12, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Your advice
Hello Moneytrees! I have read the advice you have given me on my talk page, and have taken all but one thing from it into consideration. The one thing I'm not wanting to take into consideration is restricting my editing area. I really don't want to do this as I prefer editing in the wide area that I do. I honestly have found that I learn best by doing. May I ask your reasoning for asking me to restrict my editing area? ― Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 00:46, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I'll be blunt: To avoid you being indefinitely blocked for working in areas you're not yet mature/experienced enough to work in. Work on editing content, which is the primary effort of the project. You saying you've taken everything but "one thing" from Moneytrees' message into consideration rings hollow when his core and primary point was to avoid editing these spaces. You're essentially saying you don't plan to follow his advice. Unfortunately that seems to always be your response to well meaning advice. -- ferret (talk) 02:07, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
 * So I can be indefinitely blocked just cause I"m not old enough? If so then I may as well just leave Wikipedia for a few years. ― Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:02, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
 * That's not at all what I said, which further illustrates the issue. -- ferret (talk) 15:37, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm attempting to understand what you're trying to tell me. I'm not sure if I'm just not able to understand what you're saying (or I'm interpreting it differently than what you meant) or you aren't being clear enough (not meaning this as a personal attack and if it is I apologize). ― Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:34, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * You're being advised (and have repeatedly been advised) to stop editing "project" space (Wikipedia: and Wikipedia talk: namespaces). Your editing to the Teahouse, ANI, AN, and other project spaces is problematic and a majority of your editing. You have been encouraged to instead spend more time focused on content in "mainspace"/"article space", working on actual article content. Please let me know if that is more clear. -- ferret (talk) 14:37, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * That is thank you. I will stop editing in ANI and AN and really only answer questions at the teahouse that I know that i have the correct answer for sure. It helps that I removed ANI and AN from my watchlist (which was probably part of the reason I made dumb comments there in the first place). I am working on trying to edit more in the mainspace/article space, hence my "To-do list" on my userpage (which only consists of stuff having to do with the main article space) and going a bit further away from background work (like answering Teahouse questions and anti-vandalism). ― Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:24, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Copyright removal tool
Hi Moneytrees. Is there any tool for removing copyrighted content? I'm removing copyrighted content from articles. Thanks. regards, Orbit Wharf  💬undefined📝 09:52, 26 October 2021 (UTC)


 * @Orbit Wharf, there's no tool that will remove it, you'll have to do it manually. Visual editor is easier to use than source when removing copyvio. Earwig's copyvio detector will compare articles to urls and show overlap, it's what's used the most when looking for copyvios outside of copypatrol. But before you continue at copypatrol, I think you should stop editing there. Here you marked unattributed in-wiki copying as "no action needed", which  had to fix. I changed the report status to "Page fixed". Here you marked an article that was deleted under G12 as "no action needed", although I see you nominated it for speedy deletion with G1, which didn't seem to apply.  Here you correctly removed copyvio, but you didn't remove all of it and I ended up removing the rest. Here, you removed material in the public domain, which means it's ok for us to use, as long as we note it is in the public domain. I did this by adding a template to the reference. I don't think you should continue in the area right now, and if you do, you must be very careful and should ask me before you revert anything or review a report. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide  18:55, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Copyright query
Hello, Moneytrees,

I came across a draft, Draft:Looking Back @ The Rise and Fall of Sulu Sultanate, that looks like a copy of a monograph. The copyright violation tools didn't show anything but the format of the page looks like it was just copied and pasted so I thought I'd ask you what you would do. Thanks. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 02:37, 30 October 2021 (UTC)


 * @Liz, that's a difficult one. Given the formatting of the text and tone it has to be copied from somewhere, but I can't find anything through looking around. That gives me the idea that the draft creator (User:MoroJavier) is the author listed in the text of the draft, and that this is something written for some thesis or something, copied from their personal documents. That, or they actually just wrote the thesis in draft space and the strange formatting is a red herring. Along that line of thinking I don't think the draft is a copyright violation, although Wikipedia isn't really the place for it. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 21:11, 30 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Okay, thank you for looking it over. I never considered that the editor was the author but that sounds like the likely explanation. Since most academic journals or monograph series do not have their content online, it is a difficult thing to check using the tools we have. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 00:44, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Re: Eghosa Anglican Grammar School
Hello Moneytrees,

I noticed that you have deleted "Eghosa Anglican Grammar School" from Wikipedia. Please can you send the original back to me and tell me what the issues are so I can correct it before reposting it. Thank you.

Sunnycash Sunnycash (talk) 03:08, 6 November 2021 (UTC)


 * @Sunnycash As noted in the section #Speedy deletion nomination of Eghosa Anglican Grammar School on your talk page, the article had been tagged as a copyright violation of https://eghosaoldboyshouston.org/our-history/ ; the draft was almost entirely copied from that source, and I deleted it for that reason. You have some different options if you want to access the deleted content; I can email you a copy of the deleted article (keep in mind that the content in the article is identical to https://eghosaoldboyshouston.org/our-history/, so you can already see what was deleted as long as you can access that site) or I could restore the article without restoring the copyright violating content. To avoid issues like this in the future, do not copy content from other websites. Thank you, Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 03:42, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Crooked zombie requesting assistance at Nanoeconomics
Hi, you recently protected Nanoeconomics due to disruption and general spam. The disruption is still ongoing, see also User talk:HaykAntonyan2004 for attempts to resolve the dispute. Some edit summary revdels might be in order, although finding them quite funny, I don't feel too strongly about it.

If you are otherwise occupied, I'm happy to bother another admin. I can also bring it to ANI if needed, although I think it is a quite clear-cut case, making wider community involvement unnecessary. Cheers, 15 (talk) 14:41, 7 November 2021 (UTC)


 * @15 I've indef partially blocked them from that article for their ridiculous PAs and disruptive editing. If they continue this behavior I will make the block a full one. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 16:55, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Why Have You Accused *Me* of Making Personal Attacks?
Why me? Have you read the link you left me with the warning: No_personal_attacks?

It begins with the goal of creating a "collaborative atmosphere needed to create a good encyclopedia."

Explaining, "derogatory comments about other editors may be removed by any editor. Repeated or egregious personal attacks may lead to sanctions including blocks or even bans."

Carry on reading the page, and you will see it makes no mention of vulgarity being used as it is meant to, grab one's attention and disrupt their current mode or behavior. What he did, and what the next person did was anything but what a "collaborative atmosphere" feels like.

There's not add-on on GitHub where users can claim I broke some law, created a legal situation demanding the immediate speedy deletion with no regard for any sort of due process. Why is there one here? It's obviously broken. It needs to include examples. Don't leave it up to the innocent to prove their innocence, or the speedy crew to be infallible in their dedication to attention and detail. Louis Waweru Talk  22:37, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Apology
I am really sorry about the copyright violations. I have understood my faults Please unban me and give me a single chance to correct myself. Thanks User:2006nishan178713 17:25, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

thanks for pointing out the plagiarism in my article
sir kindly let me know the draft article Draft:Gallium 68 PSMA-11, submitted is okay or not. you pointed out plagiarism yesterday. thanks a lot for helping and guiding. regards Soman. Rahulsoman (talk) 17:40, 10 November 2021 (UTC)


 * @Rahulsoman I'm not really familiar with the topic area, so I can't really comment on whether the article would be accepted or not. However the plagiarism issues are all fixed so I have no issue there. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 17:47, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the response sir. Happy to read your reply. Rahulsoman (talk) 17:54, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

blocked indefinitely / plagiarism
Sounds about right. How do I turn this around? Filipe46 (talk) 01:36, 12 November 2021 (UTC)