User talk:Moneytrees/CCI guide

Earwig and non-English
Regarding #1 at #Basic steps of CCI, maybe Earwig can't translate non-English sources, but you can Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 08:29, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * translate it yourself (try DeepL)
 * save the result in a sandbox or subpage
 * point Earwig at that page
 * G7 the page after you're done.


 * @Mathglot Yeah, that's some of what User:Moneytrees/dummy is for. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 17:34, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh, dear, so it is! I should've finished reading the page, before posting. Maybe point #1 could be reworded a bit, along with a link down to that section. Mathglot (talk) 18:48, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * @Mathglot I actually meant to mention it earlier in the guide and almost added it a few months ago, but I didn't for whatever reason- I've updated it now. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 20:42, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Why no mention of x?
Is there a particular reason isn't mentioned in the instructions for presumptive deletion? It's something I was confused about for a while. I know it's mentioned in User:The4lines/Presumptive removals but I figure it can't hurt to mention it in a place that's directly linked from the main CCI page. — SamX &#91;talk · contribs&#93; 02:23, 31 August 2023 (UTC)


 * @SamX I thought it was there already, I added a bit about it. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 16:11, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I was marking my presumptive removals with y for a while, and that definitely helps clarify things. — SamX &#91;talk · contribs&#93; 16:14, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

CC BY-SA 1.0
The "License guide" section contradicts WP:COMPLIC about the compatibility of BY-SA 1.0 text in Wikipedia. Inspecting the CC legal codes, it does seem that COMPLIC is right and it is incompatible to relicense derivative works from BY-SA 1.0 content as BY-SA 2.0 or higher.

See the CC BY-SA 1.0 Legal Code at 4b (emphasis mine):

You may distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly digitally perform a Derivative Work only under the terms of this License, and You must include a copy of, or the Uniform Resource Identifier for, this License with every copy or phonorecord of each Derivative Work You distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly digitally perform.

Compare to the CC BY-SA 2.0 Legal Code at 4b (emphasis mine):

You may distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly digitally perform a Derivative Work only under the terms of this License, a later version of this License with the same License Elements [i.e. Attribution and ShareAlike] as this License, or a Creative Commons iCommons license that contains the same License Elements as this License (e.g. Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Japan).

The wording of this last sentence is essentially similar as what the CC BY-SA 2.5/3.0 Legal Code use. (Perhaps interestingly, gives an error.) I would fix the guide, but I wouldn't consider myself "experienced with this area on Wikipedia". ObserveOwl (chit-chat • my doings) 02:43, 28 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Okay, fixed now. ObserveOwl (chit-chat • my doings) 09:07, 29 January 2024 (UTC)