User talk:Mongol1089

December 2020
Hello, I'm Arjayay. I noticed that you recently removed content from Second Crusade without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - Arjayay (talk) 18:21, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Siege of Jerusalem (1099), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 18:33, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Third Crusade, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Third Crusade was changed by Mongol1089 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.921317 on 2020-12-09T00:59:43+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:59, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Punjabis. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:18, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. 5 albert square (talk) 13:05, 9 December 2020 (UTC)