User talk:Mongusius

July 2019
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  16:25, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Can you confirm with a simple yes or no that you have appealed to Arbcom?


 * No. I made no appeal to ArbCom regarding this block. — Mongusius (talk) 20:39, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Clarification

 * My messages to ArbCom were behavioral complaints, and requests to remove private information. These were declined by an oversighter.
 * I did not intend to appeal, as NinjaRobotPirate promptly revoked his decision (block log of main account):
 * "You know what, I don’t even care any more. It’s no longer a CU block, [...]. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:21, 29 June 2019 (UTC)” (diff)
 * I consider the block still being in effect a procedural error. I've tried to contact NinjaRobotPirate about this, but he refuses to communicate:
 * "go talk to them and don't ping me (not that I'll receive your pings, anyway)." NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:15, 29 June 2019 (UTC) (diff)


 * I've contacted ArbCom (message) with a behavioral complaint on 30 June, not to appeal. "Messages are normally acknowledged by an arbitrator within 48 hours." (WP:ArbCom). This message was not acknowledged in a week - despite repeated requests -, therefore I consider the report to be ignored or declined.
 * A related request to remove private information, and complaint - also not an appeal - (message), that I've sent to the Functionaries list - received by Arbitrators as well -, was declined twice. Answer: "The functionaries list [...] will not be further replying to your emails on this topic.
 * A related request to remove private information, and complaint - also not an appeal - (message), that I've sent to the Functionaries list - received by Arbitrators as well -, was declined twice. Answer: "The functionaries list [...] will not be further replying to your emails on this topic.


 * There is no further correspondence between ArbCom and me that I expect a response to. The last emails were not acknowledged at all, despite the urgency to remove private information linking these accounts, and harmful sockpuppetry allegations.
 * For privacy reasons these alternative accounts were declared only to ArbCom (acknowledged message). Please take care to redact the main account from the block log entries, and to delete the category that lists the alt accounts as sockpuppets. Thank you.
 * — Mongusius (talk) 20:39, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Re-Request
I have few questions for you:
 * Is this your oldest account?
 * What's the point of insisting on not publicly disclosing other accounts, since you used one account to sing the other ?
 * Why do you need several accounts?  Vanjagenije  (talk)  16:46, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
 * . This user sent me an e-mail claiming that he is not able to edit this page although the talk page access has not been revoked. Wha't going on?  Vanjagenije  (talk)  11:53, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
 * No need for a check. I have now revoked TPA and disabled e-mail.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:29, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 10:06, 22 July 2019 (UTC)