User talk:Monicajohnson

Nomination of Ryan J Bruce for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryan J Bruce is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ryan J Bruce until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:27, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Ryan J Bruce. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 13:57, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ryan Jermaine Bruce


A tag has been placed on Ryan Jermaine Bruce requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Nik the  stoned  13:48, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

I redirected this to point to the existing Ryan J Bruce article. Wikipedia is not allowed to have multiple/cloned articles on the identical topic. If the problem is that an existing article has an incorrect name, that gets fixed by renaming it (a special wikipedia process that is different than normal editing). Once the deletion-discussion has finished on the middle-initial form, if consensus is to keep the article, I can help rename it. But the deletion-discussion is for the subject regardless of the article-title. DMacks (talk) 14:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Ryan J Bruce. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 21:18, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as you did with this edit to Ryan J Bruce. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Monty 845  21:19, 9 July 2011 (UTC)