User talk:Monkeylegend

Welcome!

Hello, Monkeylegend, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! RichardOSmith (talk) 21:46, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Meteora (album), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Friginator (talk) 04:26, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Meteora (album). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Friginator (talk) 04:27, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Everywhere I Go (Song) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Everywhere I Go (Song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Everywhere I Go (Song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bennydigital (talk • contribs) 14:40, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Your articles on album tracks
Please see WP:NSONGS: not all songs are notable according to Wikipedia guidelines - in particular, songs that appear on notable albums do not warrant separate articles unless they meet quite high notabilty standards of their own (such as appearing in a national chart). Familiarisation of that guideline will enable you to select subjects for your articles that won't be deleted or reduced to redirects.

Also please note the need to provide references for all the assertions made in the articles. Even describing a song's style or popularity has to be backed up and verifiable, even for things you know to be so. RichardOSmith (talk) 21:46, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

No More Sorrow (Song)
Per my above comment, I strongly believe this article about an album track should be a redirect to the album it appears on. You have reverted my edit to make it so without explanation. I have provided further explanation at Talk:No More Sorrow (Song) and would be grateful if you would engage in the discussion there. RichardOSmith (talk) 21:25, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * As you have continued to edit the article but not discussed the notability I have restored the redirect. To recreate the article again without engaging in discussion would be edit warring and may lead to editing restrictions. RichardOSmith (talk) 07:16, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kick In the Teeth


A tag has been placed on Kick In the Teeth requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RichardOSmith (talk) 21:26, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Kick In the Teeth
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Kick In the Teeth, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 21:42, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Young (Hollywood Undead Song)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Young (Hollywood Undead Song), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://christine-miller.net/lawnmowers-pictures-of-hollywood-undead-concert.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:18, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary&#32;for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. RichardOSmith (talk) 07:18, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Young (Hollywood Undead Song). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. RichardOSmith (talk) 07:58, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Papa Roach
Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Papa Roach, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. HrZ (talk) 17:44, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Numb (Linkin Park song). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Friginator (talk) 18:25, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at New Divide, you may be blocked from editing. Friginator (talk) 18:26, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hard to See, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Friginator (talk) 15:19, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for repeatedly changing genres without consensus and causing disruption. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 17:05, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Hollywoodundead2011.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Hollywoodundead2011.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:05, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Your editing privileges have been indefinitely suspended
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Perhaps you were expecting a block of two or three days? Oh, well... LessHeard vanU (talk) 19:13, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

You're not blocked forever, you're blocked indefinitely. If you are sincere, and you can convince an administrator that you are sincere, it's possible that you can be unblocked. For my money, I would recommend that you agree, up front, to never edit another music genre without discussion. Not even once, not even if it is obviously incorrect. Your entire problem begins and ends with this statement, above on this very page - "I wouldn't edit a genre if it wasn't true..." You don't get to make that call. Reliable sources do. We discuss those sources, come to a consensus agreement, and then change the genre. Never before. If you can do that, and if you're convincing, there's hope.

That said, I saw this edit in your history. What's the purpose in adding the "DO NOT CHANGE/REMOVE ANY OF THE GENRES LISTED. THANK YOU." to that edit? Again, these things are discussed first - you don't get to arbitrarily declare your version and only your version to be definitive. That's not how this works. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 12:23, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

How am i meant to convince a administrator? lol I don't know how to talk to one, can someone help pleas?. Thanks


 * Not to put too fine a point on it, but a good way to convince an administrator to unblock you would be to read my comments above and respond to them in some coherent manner. You could start by showing that you understand why you were blocked and what you should do differently in the future. If you don't plan to edit, then congratulations - enjoy reading the encyclopedia. You may do this as often as you wish, even while blocked. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 03:04, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

New request
Can someone help me please? I keep asking to be unblocked and i have apologised in all of my requests and I promised I would discuss the pages with other and I've asked and asked and even begged but no one will unblock me, and I think it's a bit harsh. Any suggestions on what I should do?. Thank you


 * User:Ultraexactzz left you clear instructions above. Your requests are not convincing, and as some have stated, incoherent in some respects.  It would help if you sign your posts; you can learn more by reading Signatures.  You also need to learn to use edit summaries (see Help:Edit summary).  Post a convincing message stating why you should be unblocked.  I am watching your talk page (possibly others are as well) and will let the other admins who have posted here know that you are interested in helping here.   Tide  rolls  23:21, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

I'm starting to get annoyed with this now :/ no one is going to give me a second chance are they? and okay i can learn more by reading those yes but im not going to read it if im blocked, it's just wasting my time. If one of you was me and i was you i would unblock you because..well thats just what i'd do because if they are sorry for not consulting others and promised they would in the future they deserve a second chance. And yeah it might not sound convincing but if i promise to do something i do it but because you dont no me you dont give a sh*t :/. so really could someone have a heart and unblock me?