User talk:Monkeyman0375

Monesekuma Monster
This article needs sources. Right now it appears to be something you made up yourself. Friday (talk) 18:13, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

I have deleted this again. Please do not recreate it unless you can do so with reliable sources. Friday (talk) 18:20, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

You appear to be wanting to do some original reporting on this subject, but we don't allow that sort of thing at Wikipedia. We're never the first place to cover any topic- we only make articles by summarizing on what other sources have already said. Friday (talk) 18:24, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Blanking my user page isn't going to magically change how Wikipedia works. We need sources as a bare minimum. If you want to have editorial control over article content, please publicize your monster on your own website. Friday (talk) 18:29, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

I'll post it somewhere else, but could you just post it a again so i could get my information back please, in the correct format

ASAP


 * There's hardly anything there. I'm not sure what good it will do you, but for now I've put it at User:Monkeyman0375/temp.  If you let me know when you're done, I can delete it again after.  Friday (talk) 20:40, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

im done and do u work for wikipedia?


 * No, editors are volunteers. I check a lot of new pages as they get created tho (and delete ones that don't belong), so that's how I noticed your page.  Friday (talk) 20:53, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

wow u have no life, u must be some loser who sits on his computer all day


 * Now, why would you go and call me names after I went out of my way to help you? You'll not make many friends with that approach.  If you wish to contribute usefully and act like an adult, welcome to Wikipedia.  If you're here to act like a child and try to stir up trouble, you're in the wrong place.   Friday (talk) 20:57, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

now ur just being a dick something u said not to do


 * I'm going to pretend you just said "Thank you". Have a nice day.  Friday (talk) 21:01, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Why not give us some positive contributions?

 * Why don't you just reread your recent edits and think about how they look to others? Self reflection might be a good thing for you at this moment in time. David D. (Talk) 21:02, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

shut up david

good advice neways


 * So that is the personality you wish to project to others here? As well as wishing to publish your original research. You have heard of myspace I presume?  You may find that a better fit. David D. (Talk) 21:19, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Uhhh
What made you think simply recreating the article again was a good idea? Information in Wikipedia must be verifiable by reliable sources. Friday (talk) 22:32, 18 June 2007 (UTC)