User talk:Monsieurdan

Damien Duhamel
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Damien Duhamel, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.damienduhamel.com/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:28, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Monsieurdan. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
 * instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  15:35, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  15:48, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I've blocked you because your edits give off the strong impression that you're a paid account that is working with the user Aieroel, who is also suspected of being a paid editor. You've recreated the article for Solidiance using a version that is identical in text and you also tried creating an article for Damien Duhamel that used copyrighted material from Duhamel's website, same as Aieroel. Your edits are different enough to where I don't think that you're the same person (WP:SOCKPUPPETRY) but I do think that you two are likely working in tandem. (WP:MEAT) You might be unblocked but you will have the same requirements as Aieroel, which are as follows:
 * Show that you understand the reasons for your block.
 * Show that you understand why copyright violations are taken seriously on Wikipedia.
 * Disclose your conflict of interest. (Saying that you do not have one is unlikely to be believed at this point.)
 * If you want to create new articles, they must be created via WP:AfC. The addition of links to pages need to be suggested on the article's talk page and/or through the reliable sources noticeboard, where they can assess the link for reliability.
 * Go through one of the training programs at WP:TRAINING or WP:ADVENTURE.
 * If you can do these, you might be unblocked. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  15:51, 27 April 2016 (UTC)