User talk:Monsieurpiggy

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Monsieurpiggy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! John of Reading (talk) 17:00, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

November 2010
Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page Jolly Roger (disambiguation). However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation do's and don'ts, you should: Thank you. John of Reading (talk) 17:01, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
 * Use short sentence fragment descriptions, which should not end with punctuation
 * Use only one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry, and avoid red links
 * Not pipe links—keep the full title of the article visible

Unmanned aerial vehicle
Please dont edit war on the Unmanned aerial vehicle article, your addition has been challenged so you really need to go to the talk page and gain consensus, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 20:33, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

You reversed my additions to Unmanned aerial vehicle saying it was not relevant. Now you say I am doing edit war. Which is it? >> MilborneOne: "go to the talk page and gain consensus."

And why is knowledge determined by "consensus"? Last time I checked, Wikipedia's standard is "verifiability"-- all you have to do to verify my edit is click once or twice and READ IT in a published source the statements by a world expert in UAV's, a transcript of his testimony before the United States Senate. I bring down the sky for verifiability and all you do is shrug.


 * Crickets**** Anyone?? Why is the standard for editing on Wikipedia now "Consensus"? Why is it not "verifiability"? Come on, somebody fix this, it is unpalatable.Monsieurpiggy (talk) 14:33, 7 April 2015 (UTC)