User talk:MonsterDoc

Welcome to my Talk Page. Feel free to contact me.

First, we are talking about the Page "Gila Monster"
I have been dealing with herpetology since 1975. Since 2003 I have been breeding Gila Monsters with annually hatching, studying and documenting their behavior, reproduction and anotomy. In days of work I have brought this page up to date on the basis of the knowledge I have gained and the research results of other well-known herpotologists. After my changes were published on November 19, all changes were reversed by the user Viewmont Viking for reasons that are very questionable. My answer on his talk page was not answered and now almost all comments including mine have been deleted from his talk page.--MonsterDoc (talk) 16:05, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

A couple of things, I'm going to use templates because it helps me to include the links and information that should be included
First, please do not insert POV statements into the articles. This line specifically is not encyclopedic and it is a POV "specimen in public exhibitions are often overfed and become therefore obese (cruelty to animals? )"

Hello, I'm Viewmont Viking. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

———

Next while there is not a rule against adding your own published works to an article it should mostly be avoided especially if the publisher is not a mainstream publishing house which I'm pretty sure Hollywood Import & Export Inc does not qualify. Right now it just looks like you are trying promote your book and you as an authoritative figure.

Hello, I'm Viewmont Viking. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

———

Please follow BRD: Bold Revert Discuss this is extra important when the article is either listed as Good or Feature as it means there has been a lot of work within the Wikipedia community to get this article to the way it is.

Your recent bold edit has been reverted. Per the bold, revert, discuss cycle, after a bold edit is reverted, the status quo should remain while a discussion is started instead of edit-warring, and it should be resolved before reinstating the edit, after a needed consensus is formed to keep it.

———

Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia, as we are a community of editors we all need to work together and follow the established policies that have been put in place to continue to make this project a success.

I am going to again revert your edits, as I mentioned you should take your change requests to the talk page before re-adding them.-- VViking Talk Edits 17:56, 19 November 2020 (UTC)