User talk:MonsterEdvardMunch

Medical articles
Please don't edit medical articles, such as Anorexia nervosa, until you have carefully read WP:MEDRS. Medical articles have a higher standard for reliable sources than many other Wikipedia articles. What we understand about human health and medicine is based on the basic science of biology, and biology is complex. Non-medical sources often are dead wrong, or dramatically overstate what we can confidently say, based on the science. For health-related content, the field is evidence-based medicine. And per WP:MEDRS – which the community created after long and arduous discussion – we reach for review articles published in the biomedical literature, or statements by major medical or scientific bodies. Thanks. Sundayclose (talk) 23:49, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tom Collister


A tag has been placed on Tom Collister requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. WWGB (talk) 11:39, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Tom Collister for deletion
The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tom Collister until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... disco spinster   talk  15:31, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Penalties for Graffiti UK
I've copied and pasted the section below from the Graffiti page here, so you do not lose your work if you would like to revise it for a page specific to the UK. See also the referencing guidelines for Wikipedia referencing, as the citations were not properly formatted.

Penalties for Graffiti UK

When the criminal damage caused by the graffiti exceeds £5,000 the maximum penalty for individuals aged 18 or more is 10 years imprisonment and the maximum penalty for people ages between 12–17 is a detention and training order up to 24 months. Alternatively if the damage is less than £5,000 the maximum sentence possible is 3 months imprisonment or a total fine of £2,500 for adults. The anti-social behaviour act 2003 allows police community support officers an alternative remedy by allowing them to issue pentalty notices of £50.

An example of this UK punishment is the case of Tom Collister. Tom belonged to a gang of graffiti artists who were carrying out acts of vandalism across South London, mainly on trains and at stations. He was said to be linked to the tags SKEAMS, SKEAMZ, SKEAM and FDC. In October 2008 Tom was given a 30 month sentence for his crimes after pleading guilty to conspiracy to commit criminal damage. He was sentenced along with the other three members of his gang, Darren Austin, who was given 18 months, William Setzdemspey who was given 15 months and Joshua Phiel who was given 12 months. All four members were initially taken to HMP Wandsworth, however in January 2009 Collister was transferred to Camp Hill Prison, making it much harder for his family to support him, while his co-defendants remained in Wandsworth. In February of 2009 Tom's sentencing appeal was heard in London and the sentence was reduced by 10 months therefore meaning he was now only to serve 20 months. He was said to be severely distressed when he was told he would be returning to Camp Hill Prison to complete the remainder of his sentence and was found dead just four days later. A statement from the inquest jury at the Coroner's Court in the Isle of Wight released their verdict claiming that there were several failures in the Prison's care system provided to Tom. The jury found many issues in the prison's supervision on the night of Collister's death. There was a lack of supervision resulting in lack of prisoner safety on the wing, the officer who found Collister did not have adequate training to deal with such an emergency situation, with no sense of how to react to suspected suicide or self-harm. They also lacked sufficient resuscitation and first-aid training. The family of Tom Collister believed that he had not intended to take his own life, it was a suspected cry for help that had gone severely wrong. A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tom Collister is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

LisaGiocondo (talk) 18:45, 28 May 2021 (UTC)