User talk:Montanacurrie

Your submission at Articles for creation: Radius Books has been accepted
 Radius Books, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Onel5969 (talk) 15:27, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Montanacurrie help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Please try hard not to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. It was only out of deference to a fellow WP:AFC volunteer that i did not nominate this article for speedy deletion as an advert after you slammed it full of authors and awards almost as soon as it was accepted. Instead I removed the authors and requested citations for the awards. Acceptance of a draft does not give you carte blanche to add material that is unacceptable. It adds a stronger level of scrutiny instead, that of the entire community. Fiddle  Faddle  21:16, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Montanacurrie. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Radius Books, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. ''During the review process we accepted your conflict of interest. That changes immediately in acceptance of the draft. At once you become subject to the full rules of Wikipedia. I perceive you to be connected with the organisation and suggest strongly that you step away from writing any more in that article.'' Fiddle   Faddle  21:25, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Radius Books Logo.tif


The file File:Radius Books Logo.tif has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Appears to be redundant to current logo, File:Radius Books Logo R with white Background.tiff"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 12:29, 29 July 2021 (UTC)