User talk:Montanayomama

July 2014
Hello, I'm Cwobeel. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to John Walsh (U.S. politician) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. -  Cwobeel   (talk)  00:53, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. -  Cwobeel   (talk)  01:04, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John Walsh (U.S. politician), you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: John Walsh (U.S. politician) was changed by Montanayomama (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951582 on 2014-07-24T01:06:18+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:06, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at John Walsh (U.S. politician) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.CFredkin (talk) 01:07, 24 July 2014 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 01:18, 24 July 2014 (UTC)