User talk:MonthofMay40/sandbox

Assignment 1
Hi, I understand your concerns about the Orangutang article, but it seems that Wikipedia users and administrators are quite happy with it since it's been promoted to a status of "Good Article." You may run into some opposition if you choose to make changes. I recommend that you choose another article, one that has more serious problems with grammar and clarity. Josef Horáček (talk) 21:47, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Assignment 2
I'm sorry to say, you didn't really do what you were supposed to for this assignment. Josef Horáček (talk) 13:35, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Assignment 3
Your lead mostly speaks about the draft in general. There is a separate article for that. Here, you should only be talking about the specific circumstances of the 2001 draft. The only helpful parts of your lead are the sentences in which you describe what can be found in the article. You are correct to point out that the article provides a detailed overview of first-round picks, followed by a list of notable players drafted in subsequent rounds. Those are the sentences to keep. Make sure to spell out "first." I discovered that another student is working on the same article. Here's what I'd like to suggest: Wait for the other student to post his or her lead. Then add another brief paragraph with the information I mentioned above. It will give the reader a map for what is in the article. Your contribution will be very short but helpful. Josef Horáček (talk) 17:22, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Good job integrating your contribution to the lead. The lead section shouldn't have a header and should be above the TOC. Josef Horáček (talk) 13:30, 10 March 2015 (UTC)