User talk:Montiman2007

A tag has been placed on Love, H Style: Dating, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. P4k 19:31, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Lovehstyle.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. P4k 19:37, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Lovehstyle, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. P4k 19:37, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on LoveHStyle.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on Talk:LoveHStyle.com. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. Blackcatuk 12:17, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Lovehstyle
Hey, I'm afraid I've deleted it again because in my opinon it failed to meet WP:WEB for notability. Have a look at the policy, provide some notability and some verifiable sources of the claims and you might stand a chance. All the best. The Rambling Man 10:19, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * You need to ensure the article has citable secondary sources (a good example would be [www.bbc.co.uk the BBC] which helps the article assert that it is notable for one reason or another. Just imagine if you submitted the article to the Encyclopaedia Britannica, if you think they'd print it then you're doing the right thing.  If not, then try to use the policies such as web notability, reliable sources, verifiability, and if you still think your article meets them all, go ahead and write it.  A good example of meeting WP:WEB is Amazon.com.  Please let me know if I can help further.

July 2007
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Lovehstyle. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Readro 16:38, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  I've already told you, it doesn't meet WP:WEB.  Creating it again will be considered blatant vandalism and your account will be blocked.  The Rambling Man 16:40, 10 July 2007 (UTC)