User talk:Montparnasse

Edit Summary Request
I have noted that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! -- Kukini 06:30, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

January 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Stephen Thorpe has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks.  Snowolf How can I help? 21:40, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. —αἰτίας •'discussion'• 22:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Stephen Thorpe
I have nominated Stephen Thorpe, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Stephen Thorpe. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Scog (talk) 13:09, 25 January 2008 (UTC)