User talk:Mooblez

Your edit to Warcraft: Orcs & Humans
Your recent edit to Warcraft: Orcs & Humans (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 03:26, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, try the sandbox instead. If you believe that your edit shouldn't have been removed &mdash; kindly let let me know. &mdash; Seadog

03:30, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Trashketball
I have added a "" template to the article Trashketball, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria.  superapathy man  22:10, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Trashketball
An article that you created, Trashketball, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Trashketball Thank you. SkierRMH 05:10, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Up for deletion again. Please see Articles for deletion/Trashketball (second nomination).  I strongly urge you to examine Wikipedia's guidelines, especially verifiability/original research.  mi  km  03:24, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

User:Melegaunt

 * I figured as such, so I'm redacting the final warning. JuJube 00:03, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Trashketball
A tag has been placed on Trashketball requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Booglamay (talk) 14:37, 30 April 2008 (UTC)