User talk:Moodswingproduction

Image copyright problem with Image:PDDR.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:PDDR.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:49, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Recent edits
I have several concerns about your recent edits; please refer to the links on policies and guidelines above:


 * Pinewood derby: Wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of links, not is it an advertising service.  I had cleaned out a number of commercial links and referenced the appropriate page on the Open Directory Project, which is a collection of links.  PDDR is already linked on the ODP.  Unless quoted and sourced, statements like "craftsmenship of these cars to an all time new height. From their innovate car designs, flawless paint schemes to the commradry amongst its fellow builders" are considered un-encyclopediac and hagiographic.  Placing PDDR in the lead of the article is spurious, as the scope of the article is not about PDDR.


 * PDDR: Your comments on Image:PDDR.jpg imply that you are connected to PDDR.  Please refer to the conflict of interest guideline.  The image is not currently used and will be deleted unless it is used in an article and has a proper rationale or is released as a free image.  The article does not assert notability and will probably be tagged for deletion quickly.  The PDDR website appears to be primarily a commercial operation.

Editors here are willing to help you, but please start by reviewing policies and guidelines and asking questions. --— Gadget850 (Ed)  talk  -  16:59, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

PDDR
A tag has been placed on PDDR, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of PDDR and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JohnCD (talk) 17:16, 29 February 2008 (UTC)