User talk:Moomoomoo/Archive 1

Nice Anti-Vandal Revert!
Hi Catzthecoolest, you reverted perfectly on the page that I can't remember what it is right now (sigh...that's what you get for doing anti-vandal for too long in a row...you can't remember where you are!) Usually the easiest way to rv is to take a glance down the page for the most likely "legitimate" edit, "compare" the two by checking the black circle next to the "legit" edit, and then "editing" the legit edit; simply saving it as is. A little dialogue box will pop up saying "if you save this page, all newer pages will be lost," which is, of course, what we want. Sorry if that was horribly confusing.

Also of interest might be: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lupin/Anti-vandal_tool

Thanks!--C.lettinga 02:46, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on Jenn Sterger's page. Ms Sterger is a good friend of mine and has asked me to keep an eye on her page for her. You go there before I did. Thanks again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sectionb (talk • contribs)


 * Thank you :O -- Catz  [ T &bull; C] 23:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Archived on 3/30/08
You know robbie savage is a nob. --90.193.230.107 23:42, 13 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Heh... -- Catz  [ T &bull; C] 23:47, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject MMO Newsletter - April 2007


Your VandalProof Application
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Catzrthecoolest. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 19:33, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Your VandalProof Application
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Catzrthecoolest. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 19:33, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Your VandalProof Application
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Catzrthecoolest. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that you recently had a nomination declined only three days ago, by Betacommand, and I endorse this users' decision and further note that three days is not long enough to reconsider.

Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon, although in a reasonable amount of time. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof.  Daniel  04:59, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Studio One
Cool for Catz. The information was obtained from 1) The internet and 2) Billboard magazine articles on Atlanta Rhythm Section. MegX (talk) 03:16, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Request for Rollback
I have granted your request for Rollback. Please remember that this i Pedro : Chat&s only to be used for vandalism reversion. If you want to try it out you can at the [[WP:NAS|New Admin School. Feel free to ask me if you need any help. nbsp; ]] 21:32, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
 * You're welcome! — Pedro : Chat  21:36, 30 March 2008 (UC)

Testing Signature
— Catz  [ Talk 21:57, 31 March 2008 (UTC) — Catz  [ Talk ] 22:00, 31 March 2008 (UTC) — Catz  [ T &bull; C] 23:18, 31 March 2008 (UTC) — Catz  [ T &bull; C] 23:19, 31 March 2008 (UTC) — Catz  [ T &bull; C] 23:23, 31 March 2008 (UTC) — Catz  [ T &bull; C] 23:24, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Catz   T •C

— Catz  [ T &bull; C] 04:22, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Huggle
I saw on Wikipedia talk: Huggle that you requested Huggle by email and never got it. Did you email User:Gurch or User:Huggle. The latter of the two is the preferred user to email for Huggle-related stuff. Cheers.-- Urban  Rose  15:59, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * If Gurch is taking too long for your taste I could e-mail you the application myself, but you'll still need to make contact with Gurch if you want updates.-- Urban  Rose  19:20, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

E-mail
I can't seem to send attachments using the "e-mail this user" function. Send me an email using that function and I'll reply with an attachment containing Huggle.-- Urban  Rose  19:50, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I've sent you the e-mail. Check your inbox. :)-- Urban  Rose  20:03, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Did you add the Javascript to you monobook.js page (see WP:HUGGLE for more details)? If not than it won't let you log in.-- Urban  Rose  20:11, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * So how are you liking it so far?-- Urban  Rose  20:15, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Well anyway I'm glad it's working for you. Use it well, my friend. If you have any more questions just let me know.-- Urban  Rose  20:20, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Your usurpation request
Your request should be filled by a bureaucrat soon &mdash; I've posted a request at the Bureaucrat's noticeboard for a crat to look at the backlog. Xenon54 22:42, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, thank you. — Catz  [ T &bull; C] 01:03, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

And thank you
For the barnstar.-- Urban  Rose  17:45, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Mario Kasun
Hi there, VASCO from Portugal

Regarding our "interaction" on MARIO KASUN (basketball player), i will only say "NO PROBLEM, MAN (OR LADY)", we all make mistakes...

Have a pleasant week and nice work overall, from PORTUGAL, VASCO AMARAL - --217.129.67.28 (talk) 02:07, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

P.S: Cats are indeed cool ;)

thanks for letting me know where to go for page protection
thanks again, It is me i think (talk) 22:56, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Silly Moocow
edits are for humans! Dangerdan97 (talk) 20:15, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Signature
Try this:

Moo Chat

I shortened the,   and   to shorter hexadecimal equivalents which are actually more recommended. I also changed your  tags to   -   is bad HTML. x42bn6 Talk Mess 23:52, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, it looks different here than there, wonder why... Sec.  x42bn6 Talk Mess  23:55, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * There's something broken on your talk page that's preventing it from appearing properly; I'll leave my version on your signature page. x42bn6 Talk Mess  23:56, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Huggle
I've sent you an email. Reply to it, and I'll send you the latest version of Huggle.-- Urban  Rose  00:51, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

A little note
Don't bother warning them. Just revert them and report them to AIV. - Jéské  ( v^_^v  Karistaa Usko ) 02:58, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Reply
You have a response at my Discussions page (follow the Kacheek emoticon in my signature). - Jéské  ( v^_^v  Karistaa Usko ) 03:01, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

"Business Owners, Customers Upset Over Controversial Billboard"
THIS totally remind me of your failed MFD, so I thought I'd share. Cheers.--Yamanbaiia (free hugs!) 21:44, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Admin coaching request status
A more personalized suggestion I have for you is to become more active in areas such as WP:XFD. Happy editing, Malinaccier (talk) 23:23, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, the standard was changed (nearly literally) overnight! :) Myself and several others had a discussion here about removing requests of editors who were below the minimum.  We then agreed that 1,750 edits was a good threshold, and I removed and contacted people who did not meet this.


 * I would like to ask you to please temporarily remove yourself from the list again until you reach the standard 1,750 edits. At this time, you will be free to add yourself back to the list at your leisure.  As you are probably aware, most RFA contributors expect a candidate to have well over 3,000 edits and over 6 months of experience—and our standards are tailored to protect potentially strong candidates from early RFAs and harsh feedback.  Once again, I request that you remove yourself from the list temporarily and re-add yourself when you have met the mark.  If you have further questions, feel free to contact me! Malinaccier (talk) 02:29, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot for your understanding! Malinaccier (talk) 03:44, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Testing
This is still Moomoomoo 64.20.18.160 (talk) 13:03, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Reply
Is the post ok now? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vmatosc (talk • contribs) 01:33, 12 January 2009 (UTC)