User talk:Moonandantarctica2

January 2013
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at Cory Bernardi, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. StAnselm (talk) 12:22, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Excuse me for a moment, person who names themselves after a saint on the interent, but please, tell me what exactly it was about my editing an article for relevance and adding legitimate sources to an article constitutes a 'personal attack'? Was it that I stumbled upon a personal crusade you were carrying out against some other user? Or do you just block people for your own personal self-interest? Why do you care so much? Detail what made it a personal attack please?

Who are you, a total random, to be littering my unused talk page?
 * Personal attacks are completely unacceptable. You were blocked for calling me a "homophobic racist", and then you followed it up by saying "this guy is a nutjob". Now, I don't block anyone - only administrators can block people. I was giving you fair warning, though your 24-block before should have told you what were the expectations here on Wikipedia. As regards the article, we appear to be engaged in an editing dispute. You should start a conversation on the article's talk page if you want to make a change which other editors disagree with. This edit looked a bit sneaky to me - you were removing the content that I thought should remain, but disguised your removal with an edit summary that said you were adding a reference. So I don't think you've made a great start to Wikipedia, but lots of good editors have had a bumpy road starting off. Feel free to remove the warning that I posted here, if you have read and understood the message. StAnselm (talk) 20:45, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

WHAT!?!? I called the person you were warring with on this public IP address I'm using a 'nutjob', i initially thought your user name was nickD, then corrected myself. So I was saying, 'Stanselm, that guy (you're warring with) is clearly a nutjob, but...'. Please re-read the edit post and it will be a bit clearer in this context. I certainly did not call you a 'homophobic racist'. You can post an apology for your false accusations and warning here whenever you're ready thanks. I only got involved as I went to use wikipedia and found that the IP address here at the hostel was blocked, so I poked around to find out why, and frankly, because I was bored got caught up in it myself. Just because two people share an IP address doesn't mean they are the same person, or do you not understand how the internet works? As for accusations of 'sneakiness', i didn't bother directly referring to the correction as it was pretty clear from the repetitive subtraction and addition of words displayed on the history that I obviously was maintaining my original approach to the article, therefore only mentioned the NEW addition. (moonandantarctica2) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.181.107.123 (talk) 00:21, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * If those edits from your IP were not made by you, then I am sorry for the false accusations. I suggest, however, that you distance yourself from the edits that were made by your IP - it probably wasn't helpful getting involved in the same article. That sort of thing makes the folks at Sockpuppet investigations suspicious. And calling IP editors "nutjobs" isn't acceptable either. StAnselm (talk) 00:41, 29 January 2013 (UTC)