User talk:Moondalek101

April 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Doctor Who with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 15:17, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Doctor Who with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 15:26, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Samuel E Allport


A tag has been placed on Samuel E Allport requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ben Ben (talk) 15:23, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Orphan (film). Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ben Ben (talk) 15:44, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

The article Sam Allport has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:04, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:10, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of SEA's The Neighbour


The article SEA's The Neighbour has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreleased non-notable film

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GILO  A& E&uArr;  22:29, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

January 2013
Hello, I'm 117Avenue. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Smosh, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 02:55, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

February 2013
Hello, I'm Avoided. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Lady Gaga, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Avoided (talk) 14:02, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Waterloo, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Ma &reg;&copy; usBr iti sh {chat} 14:06, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf(talk) 14:34, 7 February 2013 (UTC)