User talk:Moondyne/Archive 8

SmokeFree WA Thundersticks
Just renamed it as the Sponsors would like capital F instead of lower case! 2001atlas10 08:15, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Ok, will do next time, i'm not to sure where the move button is though? 2001atlas10 08:33, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

I see it now!2001atlas10 08:33, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Steven Boyce
I'm not all that familiar with Australian hockey, but is this really a speedy candidate? The article says that Boyce has "represented the Club more than 50 times at 1st Grade level, and played in Premiership teams in 2002, 2004" as well as representing his state at "underage and open level". Loganberry (Talk) 15:15, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Steve is possibly the better players of the 3 Boyce brothers, he is also the youngest, unfirunately injury has prevented him from playing since early 2005! 2001atlas10 08:15, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

WAY79
Looks that way, doesn't it. The image was scanned and emailed to me by an anonymous Wikipedian. If said anon is reading this, he might like to tell me where it came from so that it doesn't get one of those irritating and pointless no source tags. Hesperian 04:05, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

db
No worries :) Marmion is an exceptional case - I'm struggling to think of another Perth primary school that would meet notability, and Marmion's reasons for doing so have very little to do with the school itself and more with the context and planning - I'm working on a series of articles for development in northern Perth, especially related to the Hamersley, Mirrabooka, Whitford, Mullaloo and Joondalup schemes with reference to an entirely separate one in Sorrento/Marmion which to some extent related to the Hamersley scheme. It may be after I've finished those that the Marmion school will be better suited to a paragraph in one of those and can then simply be merged. Orderinchaos 07:18, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * There's a funny story in there actually - basically a case of the planners thinking things would go one way, then events taking a very different turn as they do (coastal development would have made more sense but the bits east of the freeway got built first, then extended (slowly) westwards from that)... By the time the development hit the coast again it was coming south from Mullaloo, not north from Marmion, and the entire "Marmion city centre" plan had to be scrapped. The area, instead of home to Australia's largest shopping complex and skyscrapers, now houses a McDonalds (Marmion/Burragah in Duncraig) and an old people's home, I believe... Orderinchaos 07:29, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

aussieBum
Hi Moondyne. Why was this tagged as advertising? The article's subject is a company, but what was considered inappropriate content? It is properly referenced and (as far as I believe) written in NPOV. Posted this to the article talk page. Thanks. Bren talk 10:56, 26 April 2007 (UTC)


 * This article is not self-promotion as I do not work for the company and are completely independant from them. Links to the news sites The Age, Fox News, and the Channel 10 News clip are not for advertising; I was citing what I believe to be legitimate sources. The company is an internationally recognised fashion brand, particularly ouside Aus. Bren talk 13:05, 26 April 2007 (UTC)


 * No probs will wait for the 3rd party on this one. Bren talk 13:26, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

PSA Athletics
I feel that they PSA Swimming, PSA Athletics and Darlot Cup meet WP:N. Your thoughts.... Twenty Years 12:14, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

from one bum to another
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Australian_architects&diff=126128772&oldid=126128478 I am not very sure after a number of disparate conversations as to what this might consistute...SatuSuro 13:21, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Cricket World Cup trophy.jpg
It doesn't look right in certain px's why is that? have a look at it here Cricket World Cup. It looks deformed kind of. I don't know why though, I am going to revert it back because I don't know what is the problem there but it's totally fine if you want the cropped version after figuring out how to fix it. For now I'm reverting it back, is that ok?--THUGCHILD z  06:49, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Can you crop this picture- Image:Mello.jpg so it just Mello, Also could you upload it up to wikimedea too- --THUGCHILD z  08:22, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

hey i got but i don't know if we could use it. Can you see if i did this right?--THUGCHILD z  06:22, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Could we use this picture if I asked for permission? What's the policy of using pictures of newspaper? Would it have to be fair use?--THUGCHILD z  04:05, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Isn't it like the screen shots, though?

Also I just got permission to use this picture on wikimedia but the question is, can I upload it there? Since last time I uploaded a trophy picture there, I was told that I couldn't upload trophy pictures in wikimedia as the trophies were still copyrighted, etc. But then I read some excuses such as it's ok because of freedom of panorama and the trophies being at public places etc to keep other pictures. So my question is can we find any legitimate excuse for it to be there? The picture was taken in Lords, England. I'm not sure because I'm not aware of the laws of England. If you're wondering, I'm just on a picture hunt and trying to get permission for pictures, so if you're looking for any just let me know :) --THUGCHILD z  06:02, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

I have emailed the website and asked if we could use it on wikimedia commons. I got a reply from the owner of the website saying thanks for not just taking the picture and "That's fine to use to use it with a link to Cricket Web." But can we upload it to commons?--THUGCHILD z  03:13, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks.--THUGCHILD z  03:55, 3 May 2007 (UTC) I'm so so sorry to be bothering you so much but I don't want to mess up and still am still confused, can you look at Commons:Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Commons:Freedom of panorama and see if that would be ok to be in commons?--THUGCHILD z  04:03, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Well yeah I know, and I'm going to forward that email with the permission to the wikimedia foundation but I was just making sure it wasn't Commons:Commons:Derivative works and now that I see it's not I'm going to go ahead and do that. Thank you for your cooperation.--THUG<font color="#E41B17">CHILD <font color="#C0C0C0">z  04:24, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Cricket World Cup Trophy.jpg so is that ok? If that is allowed to be on commons than why is this and this not allowed? If they are would you please upload it onto there.--THUG<font color="#E41B17">CHILD <font color="#C0C0C0">z  06:47, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

This] basically says that a picture focusing of a copyright trophy can't be upload to commons because it's Commons:Commons:Derivative_works but Commons:Commons:Freedom of panorama should let the pictures stay as this picture but I don't know about the picture that was taken in Jamaica as I have been looking at [ http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:QsTR49KqRbsJ:portal.unesco.org/culture/en/file_download.php/037203c9a35fc910a4addd57cb1f4701JamaicaCopyright%2BAct%2B1.pdf+Jamaica+Copyright+Act+of+1993&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us&client=firefox-atheir copyright laws] and all I got from it was that the photographers has the copyright which we acquired but I don't know what's the deal with their freedom of panorama since the trophy itself is copyrighted from UK. But one thing for sure- the old trophy should be ok since that was taken from England which gives it freedom of panorama.--THUG<font color="#E41B17">CHILD <font color="#C0C0C0">z  04:56, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Update on cricket vandal
Hi there. Re. this incident earlier, just to let you know that the Cambridge U. vandal has now been identified by the college so hopefully, User:Crickettragic will no longer have to suffer harassment. Thanks for helping out! :) - A l is o n  ☺ 11:56, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Speedy tags
I have removed the speedy deletion tags from West Leeming Primary School and South Perth Primary School as they clearly do not qualify for speedy deletion, if you thought they were, why did you not just delete them because you have sysop tools? They would probably have been restored because they are appropriate?  Te ll y a ddi ct  16:41, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your advice. &mdash;Moondyne 16:48, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Why have you deleted them? They are clearly notable, you have just deleted perfectly suitable and fine articles, they do not meet the Criteria for speedy deletion, I am going to ask an admin to restore them. Te ll y a ddi ct  16:50, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 * As you wish. I disagree. &mdash;Moondyne 16:51, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

RE:Portal:Western Australia
Thanks still got a bit of work to do though. Hossen27 07:25, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

I have been letting hossen know that in the Indonesian project- due to having an assessment set of articles, a project and portal concurrent - talk items would get posted on one of three areas- anything you might be doing at the moment that might mean centralised and not dispersed avenues of opertion are appreciated SatuSuro 14:06, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: Test cricket progression of record
I was recording results from the cricinfo scorecards and was interested about the progression of record and who was the best batsmen/bowlers at certain time periods so I was compiling it on my own. There might be a website that has that information but I couldn't find it. I am working on ODI's too but probably wont put it on wiki since I'm only at 1983 and I'll be pretty busy this summer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eggy2486 (talk • contribs)
 * Above is in response to this. &mdash;Moondyne 23:24, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Gotcha
Here's a gotcha for ignorant newbs like me. Back in August last year, I moved Swan River, Western Australia to Swan River (Western Australia), then used AWB to bypass the redirect. Having just cleaned up my watchlist, and not wanting it polluted by a whole pile of uninteresting articles whose only redeeming feature was a link to our river article, I unselected the "add articles I edit to my watchlist" checkbox in ABW. I have only just discovered today, eight months later, that by doing so, I actually removed from my watchlist any number of important articles like Swan River Colony, History of Western Australia and Perth, Western Australia, plus a whole lot of articles I created myself and thought I was watching. :-( Hesperian 00:34, 30 April 2007 (UTC)


 * cough cough splutter you have 8,160 pages on your watchlist (excluding talk pages) beams out at me with a glear and grin, :( sigh cough cough splutter SatuSuro 01:59, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Struth!!! You clearly win (or lose depending on which way you look at it). I'm on 2,690 and reckon thats about 1000 too many to be manageable.  Before last years big purge I had about 4,000.  &mdash;Moondyne 02:05, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I use to sit around 10,000 before I got ruthless. I'm currently at 5,800. And yes, that's way too many to be manageable. Purging is hard work but, and there's no way I would wipe it and start afresh. Hesperian 02:13, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

The trick is most of them are cats (not the feline) - so a 1,000 lot from the watch list at a time seems fine and manageable - so far SatuSuro 11:20, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Wikitables
Hey, ive just made several wikitbles on Sport in the Public Schools Association and was just wondering how to make them so it has two column's, instead of one. Im trying to make the page a little shorter (in terms of scrolling length). Thanks Twenty Years 04:27, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

AMH
apart from everything else, splutter, slip, slide (where did all that rain come from!), I am beginning to think the Cat:AMH should be a cat in which for instance the shipwrecks of oz should be in - what do you think? SatuSuro 12:08, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Wow - see SS Loongana as a good example - surely the cats as they are there - and the amh cat - how would you cleanup there for instance? SatuSuro 12:22, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Also we might have had this conversation somewhere in the last year or so - surely the Port of Freo and or the authority need an art quite sep from the main freo art yes? SatuSuro 12:24, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Yeah maybe I should concentrate on making sub categories of the MHA first - before I trying running with the Freo Port Auhtority or the runaway NT project! :( SatuSuro 12:32, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Dogs? ah yes. when you point that out - thats where that sub page of the project I was trying to delve into the innard of it all - off for a coffee the rain has stopped.. different tack when Im back - cheers SatuSuro 12:39, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Categories
''If a person was born in one state but lived most of their adult life and died in another, is it reasonable for them to be in two categories Category:People from xxx, or should we just use the birth state ?? &mdash;Moondyne 14:00, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Short answer: Naming_conventions_(categories).
 * Long answer: the "people from" categories use a "notable residence" semantics, meaning that a biography article should be included in a "people from" category if the subject of the biography resided there, and the fact that they resided there is notable. Naming_conventions_(categories) states that "the place of birth is rarely notable", but personally that is a load of utter codswallop. Place of birth is inherently notable, else why is it a key piece of information in every biography, and even included in persondata?
 * As always, there are grey areas: should Herbert Hoover be in Category:People from Western Australia? I should say yes, but the category would never stick while the article contains only two sentences on his time here. One of these days I'll read Hoover's millions and how he made them and the various other sources on Hoover's life on the goldfields, and update that section. And then I'll make the category stick.
 * Hesperian 00:28, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Welcome. BTW, your question prompted me to make a fuss on the convention talk page. Hesperian 00:39, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Shipwrecks
I've just seen your Rottnest Island shipwrecks and City of York (barque) articles for the first time. Outstanding stuff. Hesperian 01:37, 1 May 2007 (UTC) You're so humble moondyne - it sets a standard for the whole oz and oz mar hist projects there! a high one! (just imagine doing a shipwrecks of the bass strait to that standard?) SatuSuro 03:51, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * One long boring day when the shed is sorted - I'm planning to do it - at least I have an excellent example template to work from!  btw do you reckon the NT project looks ready to go? I'm itching to take the in process tag off SatuSuro 04:18, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

NT expatriates
Therein lies a long coffee mixed with a fine red and plenty of time... bit like more Taswegians in Melbourne than Tas ..I'm off and out - I'll check it all laterSatuSuro 04:38, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Moondyne! It was a bit of a rushed job, so I'll try to tweak it to look shinier on the weekend :) – Riana ऋ 05:10, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 30th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

User:Curtinuniversity
Thanks for taking the ball and running with it. Gnangarra 16:24, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Astronomy shelter
Well done with the star barn - its looks great and ghostie deserved it - good stuff SatuSuro 07:20, 2 May 2007 (UTC) When one hoogles the beacon with a skip - you find it is mentioned somewhere on this pdf - god knows where though - :(  http://www.dpi.wa.gov.au/mediaFiles/cycling_albanybybike.pdf Which suggests that there is an error in the position - as the pdf encompasses the closer to albany region SatuSuro 14:17, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Beacon
I was just there. It is in landscape shot I took. It marks the entrance between the Sound and Oyster Harbour on something called the Lockyer shoal. Regards ☻ Fred|☝ discussion |✍ contributions  14:34, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Gawd I think i forgot to send the mess to you! apols - and - Thanks for that am away from computer most of today will think through another question or two about all this (cats) as well - but thanks! SatuSuro 02:07, 3 May 2007 (UTC) Have decided (it will slow things down) to treat each case as I meet it and identify it. Have dropped the impatient deletion idea. The stats (I havent kept a count) are such that I would guess 10% have stupid things on them - I'll take my time with them instead. Oh well so much for a haircut, and what a few other mundane things can do SatuSuro 09:43, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

TEE
Ah, needs a bit of a re-write? Unfortunately im abolsutely losing my head atm. Bulk assignments have just come up - it will take a little while unforntunately. Twenty Years 09:00, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Am also happy to review it (am in same boat as TY... it's not letting up at all :|) Orderinchaos 09:06, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey, can you keep an eye on User:Brettwest - he is uploading alot of images to the Hale School page and ive found 1 copyvio already - but are stuggling to find others here - can you keep an eye on it. Twenty Years 09:15, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, something has been troubling me while i have been away from the wiki: "why are private schools more notable than government schools" - i find this odd. Thoughts? Twenty Years 09:15, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * He doesnt seem to understand what i said to him - prob because i dont fully understand images, can you give him a go. I fixed the link above. thanks Twenty Years 12:49, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * After next Thursday, while I'll still be busy as anything and catching up, I think I'll need something non-work-related to keep my sanity. I've recently started fixing up a lot of town and suburb articles in just general ways when I have five minutes here and there. Orderinchaos 15:59, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

User page
Cheers, and kudos to tallkev. It won't last long though. I prefer to showcase my own work, so I'll replace it as soon as I've actually done something worth showcasing. Yesterday I created a really cool map showing the distribution of Banksia woodlands on the Swan Coastal Plain, but it turned out too tall and thin to grace my userpage.

Next time I archive I'll drop it back to three boxes: 1-10, 11-20, 21. At some point I guess I'll probably turn those userboxes into a ribbon a la my /Navigation template. Too much chrome. Hesperian 23:57, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Collectors
Have you found any similar cats in other projects? I think there might room for Stokes in there - and also book collectors as a sep cat too - whatcha think? SatuSuro 05:17, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Apologies followed the trail and found - Category:Collectors - heheh it is friday SatuSuro 05:20, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

gimme the weekend - and if you are feelling happy with life (not stressed or on wikipedia at 3 am like some) you might not want to look at Human trafficking in Angeles City suspect that it is ugly and out of hand or maybe I sense the article and its ambience seem to be quite yuk SatuSuro 05:38, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Grieve
I was aware of his presence in your 100, and thought it my job to write it, but didn't have any sources. To my great embarrassment, it never occurred to me to search the web :-( Thanks for the link; I'll get onto it.

While we're on the subject, I've got good resources on a number of the 100. Offhand: a brief bio and the autobio of Alexander; a brief bio of Bold; ditto Brearley; a history of Bunnings; a brief bio of Samson; ditto Wardle. I'll try to muster some interest in writing some biography articles. Meanwhile, if you ever want sources for any of these, I'd be happy to scan / loan 'em.

Hesperian 11:58, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

The Biographical Register entries are very small but very dense. Follows verbatim:


 * Boan, Henry (Harry)


 * Merchant. B 4 Nov 1860, Jones Creek, nr Dunolly, Vic., s. of Thomas, miner and road contractor, and Rachel Isaacs; M 17 June 1896, Hebrew Ch, Bayswater Road, Sydney, NSW, Sophie Bebarfald (B c. 1868), d. of Barnett and Fanny Davis; 1s. 2d.; D 18 Mar 1941, Caulfield, Vic. Karrakatta cem. C of E.


 * Educ. Dunolly. At age 16 commenced work at Flegeltaub's Ballarat warehouse, then variety of jobs in Qld, Vic. and NSW mercantile houses; street trade in Broken Hill 1888, with brother Ernest opened firm of Boan Bros Ltd in 1890, soon the leading drapery establishment; 1895 to WA with brother Benjamin; established br. of Boan Bros, opened 7 Nov 1895; 1900 sold interest in Broken Hill business, assumed sole proprietorship in WA after Benjamin's death in 1901; 1918 br. of State Savings Bank opened in store, criticism of this led to resignation from Leg. C; 1918 floated store as limited company; 1918-20 in Engl. where his wife and children had settled in 1913; 1929 relinquished control of store to son Frank; gave substantial financial support to Children's Hosp., pres of Hosp. Bd; prominent race horse owner and breeder; member AJC, chmn WATC and VRC; c. 1932 settled in Melb.


 * Nat.


 * MLC Metro. Prov. 14 Apr 1917-21 Feb 1918 (resigned); Metro.-Sub. Prov. 15 Nov 1922 (b/e)-24 May 1924.


 * WA 19 Mar 1941; Battye I, 697 (port.); Crowley, 262; DWA 5; ADB 7.}}

The basic format of the entry is: DOB etc; biography; political party affiliation; parliamentary service; references.

Regarding references: "WA" is The West Australian - that would be an obituary. "Battye" is the Cyclopedia; "Crowley" is Australia's Western Third, and page 262 merely says (in the context of raising money for the unemployed during the Depression): "Typical of the times was... the very large personal donations made by such men as Charles McNess and Harry Boan."; DWA is the Dictionary of West Australians.

As usual I've given you way too much information ;-) Hesperian 13:12, 4 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Nope, it is a scholarship named after the 1831 Exhibition. Hesperian 04:25, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Is there any reason why I shouldn't go through and re-rate all the articles on The List as high-importance? I know people like Grieve and Boan seem unimportant, but if Armstrong's panel of historians think otherwise, who are we to argue? Hesperian 12:13, 5 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Hmmm dont let me start about them and their foibles :) SatuSuro 12:15, 5 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Moving this the the list talk page. &mdash;Moondyne 12:19, 5 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Roger that. While we're on the subject, can I get a review of the -Class of John Forrest. This was one of my best articles back in the day, and I'm surprised to see it rated "Start". The only reason I can think of why someone would have rated it so low is because I (re)wrote it before inline citations were in vogue. Hesperian 12:20, 5 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I would say B and closer to GA short of a nomination in my opinion (back to tagging he says) SatuSuro 12:29, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Few points

 * (1) DYK - surely youve cleared the big 4-0 by now? - and congrats on the latest
 * (2) I dont mean to be disruptive about the 100 silly buggers list - if I need to clarify further - please let me know - it all goes back to the conversation we hade over the long lunch i think - it might be clear to me - but maybe others need more qaulification - would appreciate the proverbial - explain more - if its not very well explained SatuSuro 12:49, 5 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Youre so coy about the 4-0 :) SatuSuro 12:52, 5 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Looks like Hesp is off - my last bit at the 100 - I really think the context of the west as a monopoly/establishment and the historians as constrained needs to be mentioned somehow or somewhere in the list - as my rogue argument that the more devious and controversial - participants in the states history - may have in their own way been as influential in being influential ib creating a sense of what the perth community thought about itself (the barracks arch. cook hanging, and the moratorium marches - come to mind)- has some weight, not much - but there is a potential argument - maybe a separate article on them to balance - maybe something like a scandal/rogues in wa history type thing.  I dunno - still thnking about it. SatuSuro 13:18, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Not off yet; I was temporarily declining to be distracted from writing articles. Hesperian 13:43, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Cook, Burke and Bond all got a gong as I recall. Even Yagan, so the rogues are there. I don't see much likelihood of the list ever making into the article space though. Its just for discussion.

I stopped worrying about DYKcountitis a long time ago. User:ALoan has that department sorted \. See User_talk:ALoan/Archive16 for example. An amazing editor. &mdash;Moondyne 13:27, 5 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Yup - your point about some of the rogues is a good counterpoint to my rave - thanks for that. I suppose I keep outside of the list of others dorothy hewett, k s prichard, and veronica brady - and others as well.
 * Your showing what Loan got up to - yup - I can understand what you are saying there. Heheh - oh well we trundle noisily on into the night SatuSuro 13:37, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

1851 Exhibition Scholarship
Thanks, came out of Hesperian's red link and your query, had never heard of it 24 hours ago --Melburnian 02:28, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Barry Sullivan.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Barry Sullivan.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 03:06, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Up the creek
without a paddle - if you are on or able to help - please - trying to launch a boat while its still in the water or something - should have kept to tagging SatuSuro 03:09, 7 May 2007 (UTC) How typical of me - the australian literature project was in baby- whatsernames sub page - I thought cj was around - and so I launched - please give it the once over if there is anything that needs an obvious fix please - Gnanggara will be here in about an hour I can get him to do things too - and theres a possibility that cj will be back on and do a fix or two. Please dont bother if you are otherwsise but if you could give it a look - thanks SatuSuro 03:38, 7 May 2007 (UTC) Thanks for that - cheers SatuSuro 03:41, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Dictionary of Australian Biography project change reverted
Hi Moondyne, I reverted your prior edit to this project page WikiProject Australia/To-do/Australian Dictionary of Biography, hope that's OK. I know the redirected entries for Sherbrooke and Lee-Steere weren't on their own line, but if they have a line to themselves, the subtotals for those letters is incorrect. e.g. "S" has 51 of 97: 53% but if Steere has his own line with a see James George Lee-Steere then there would be 98 entries under "S" and people may say the stats are wrong. The sub-totals should add up to the total number of actual entries in the D.A.B., not including the see other entries. Hope that explains things. — Diverman 06:43, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 7th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:27, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Mercedes College (Perth)
Just saw your catch, nice one. All that stuff is starting to get really old for me now... Later. SeanMack 12:13, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

West Coast Tas
What a pleasant suprise! well done - its taken the weight off what I was forever planning to get from the further reading items in personal possession. Thanks for that! SatuSuro 15:04, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Could you possibly do Robert Carl Sticht - I'll owe you if you can (nudge nudge) - Im sure hes on adb as well SatuSuro 15:20, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Typical, you turn your back and look whats happened - not tagged - and heaps of further reading from satusuro to add at the bottom ,sigh SatuSuro 15:25, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bon Scott
The article Bon Scott you nominated as a good article has failed, see Talk:Bon Scott for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a review. The Sunshine Man 12:01, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Subsequently promoted to GA. &mdash;Moondyne 06:36, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Boans

 * Nominated by User:Carabinieri . For some reason, I am a bit embarrassed by this one.  It just seems too local. &mdash;Moondyne 06:19, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

TEE
Hey, um i want to get working on this article. Can you give me some sort of guide to work on. Sections (naming all sections you think need covering)? or maybe another similar article? or is this just a lengthening exercise? Many thanks, Twenty Years 13:31, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I've given my opinion both of the edit summary and this question on 20yrs talk page Gnangarra 13:47, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Please
Could you look at the lit project and see if there is any admin type cleanup of the project that you can do - i had got to a bit of a hiatus with cj about the creation of the assessment pages - I wasnt sure if it was something I could do or not. Thanks if you can dont worry if you cannot cheers SatuSuro 04:55, 11 May 2007 (UTC) BTW - excellent start to the Boans arrt! SatuSuro 04:56, 11 May 2007 (UTC) Thanks for letting me know - avagoodweekend SatuSuro 08:05, 11 May 2007 (UTC) + e Orderinchaos 08:11, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Edit conflict
Wow. Three editors at once, taking in the river views. I didn't try to merge it, but I kept my 'raw' edit if you want it. I should have put up a 'ed at work' sign. ☻ Fred|☝ discussion |✍ contributions  08:34, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I had one at my user space once! At the draft for Bessie Ris ... er, forget I spoke.  FNORD! ☻ Fred|☝ discussion |✍  contributions  08:46, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Rats, I should have known fnord would not work with an illuminatus. I stubbed the Moseley Royal Commission and have four other related drafts and a couple of dozen redlinks.  I will push it out and read the Davison apologist tome later. I got a wee bit involved, she is never far from my thoughts - just my edits.  ☻ Fred|☝ discussion |✍  contributions  09:04, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

FPC/GA
Hello, I have decided that you and other users were right about considering waiting for a few weeks (even months) before beginning to get involved with GA and featured picture candidate closing, I took your advice the wrong way, I'm sory for any trouble or negative feelings caused by this, happy editing! The Sunshine Man 11:28, 11 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks, that really means a lot to me, I blanked my user and user talk page because I was a little annyoyed but I shouldn't really, I intend to stick around here, thanks again! The Sunshine Man 15:43, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Copyright Question
heya - thought you might be able to help me. i found an image of Xavier Herbert taken in 1938 at Picture Australia. their copyright information specifically states that photos taken before '55 are out of copyright, but the image itself is listed as "Reproduction rights owned by the State Library of New South Wales". i'm sure that i could use any number of photos under fair use, but as I prefer to find a public domain one if possible, what does "reproduction rights" actually mean in terms of Wikipedia if the copyright has expired? hope you can help. thanks baby_ifritah 13:07, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Just to Inform you
You and the number of articles you have successfully submitted to DYK has been noted here because you have been discovered as one of the twenty-five highest DYK article contributors. If you feel compelled to continue to update your number of DYKs on this list, and therefore the list itself, then it would be very helpful and help make sure that the list is as up-to-date as possible. If you, indeed, do not wish to be present on this list, then please notify me, the creator. Regards, <font face="Trebuchet MS, Trebuchet"> &mdash;A • D  Torque 11:37, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

You're right
I should have said, but I just needed a fresh start, I know we had minor crossowrds a few weeks ago and for that I am sorry, I didnt' feel ready to say just yet, I hope your estmations of me have not went down through all of this.... . Kindest regards - The Sunshine Man 13:11, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
 * It was just I didnt want to say just yet as my current account is only about 10 days old so I didnt want to say just yet. Thanks for being so friendly about it. Regards - The Sunshine Man 13:26, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
 * There, I've added all the necessary information in bold at the top, would you say that is OK, I've also told the users hi wished me goodbye as Tellyaddict and left a notice on my userpage and user talk page, i'm still going to edit under this account but the people should know.The Sunshine Man 13:33, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Great, thanks a lot. Kindest regards - The Sunshine Man 13:42, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

nah - youre not actually at 50 yet, nah youre humble and dont bother about that stuff any more, nah SatuSuro 14:29, 13 May 2007 (UTC) User:Anonymous Dissident/List of Wikipedians by number of DYKs I had noticed and was going to include it in the sentence above - but am trying to look three directions at once with some other things on my watch in relation to the lit project - the new acotf - and some issues from having been to the dockers game this arvo (!) - - probably will have to get off before I get a chance to sort out all three threads. If you get to within the top 5 before the end of the year (ie 2007 calendar year), I'll nominate a meetup venue and first shout appropriate for the occasion! (I have some devilish ideas for that) cheers SatuSuro 14:39, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

A challenge
Category:WikiProject Australian literature - there is something remiss in there - can you spot my errors and point me to the right way and the errors of my tagging? I am sure a project should not have the blend of things as they are at that location. I'd appreciate any clues as to where I went wrong, ta SatuSuro 15:48, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I keep thinking in the main lot that where I see 'Cat talk ' in the general section - that they should be sub cats and that I have done something wrong somehwere - or is it in the bowels of the coding that I havent worked on? SatuSuro 01:48, 14 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Sorry to bother about it - take your time - I'm about to be off probably rtill either v late tonight or tommorow anyways SatuSuro 01:58, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Moondye, thank you for your kind words in support of my RfA. Please feel free to drop me a note any time if there is anything that I might be able to do for you. Pastordavid 16:03, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Bomberblitz
Hi, you noted on the Afd that you were waiting on secondary sources. I have added a few; has that altered your opinion on the article ? John Vandenberg 05:15, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 14th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:55, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Support
And agree with your prognosis of the worst article - it does need a re-write! SatuSuro 14:38, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Guildford grammar.gif
Hello, Moondyne. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Guildford grammar.gif) was found at the following location: User:Moondyne/temp2. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or    media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 06:46, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Page deleted. &mdash;Moondyne 08:15, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:HaleCrest.jpg
Hello, Moondyne. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:HaleCrest.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Moondyne/temp2. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or    media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 06:57, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Page deleted. &mdash;Moondyne 08:15, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Help needed with SEO article
I've nominated search engine optimization for featured article status, and you've helped edit this article. Could you possibly look at the references on the article and then leave your comments at Featured article candidates/Search engine optimization as to whether you think the blogs and forums cited as references qualify as reliable sources. In order to achieve featured article status we need community consensus that the references are reliable. If you know any other Wikipedians who have expertise in this area, we welcome their comments. Thank you! Jehochman ☎ / ✔ 19:20, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

The gg
I was about to alert and you did it - good on you SatuSuro 09:21, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for that. Actually that was Jazzper not Bradles (unless they're the same person!). Just coincidence I got trolled by both on the same day. ;-) Hesperian 11:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, I had three troll socks on my talk page at the same time. A sock of Gherkin30 was going hammer and tongs at a sock of Bradles, when all of a sudden a sock of Jazzper decided to drop in and say hello. That's gotta be some kind of record. Hesperian 12:49, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Sounds about right. :-) The gherkin has now promised "your user page is getting destroyed", like I give a f**k. The only problem with all of this is I've been trying to update Banksieaephyllum for the past hour, and I keep getting interrupted. Hesperian 13:13, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I just obliterated the lot of them. Hesperian 13:20, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * ... at least I think I did; they haven't all come up in my block log. Hesperian 13:22, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

New art
would appreciate if you could give a once over of the new western mail art I started, ta SatuSuro 13:52, 19 May 2007 (UTC) went for dyk (I'll never catchup) but the 1980 version has lots of politics ive forgotten SatuSuro 06:26, 20 May 2007 (UTC) cripes roberts article has more red links than I have had beers in this calendar year! (wiki meetups only of course :) ) SatuSuro 12:09, 20 May 2007 (UTC) Be curious what you think of the next new art, sigh SatuSuro 13:24, 20 May 2007 (UTC) I am wondering about the creation of a sub-category to house xxxx in Australia articles- to keep em out of the main history categories. what do you think? SatuSuro 02:45, 21 May 2007 (UTC) Hey thanks for that - ignoramus shown up again :) - I think I was tagging the wrong cats to the year arts - oh well - I'll need to go back and clean em up. Sorry to have bothered. SatuSuro 03:24, 21 May 2007 (UTC) I would be v interested your reaction to the sesqui books (the clever reviwer will realise there is one book missing from the list :) SatuSuro 04:02, 21 May 2007 (UTC) Campbell Sharmans politics volume - somehow It does not show up on the henrietta list as being part of the 14 - odd - forgot to go back and checkout why or why not SatuSuro 04:41, 21 May 2007 (UTC) And I have personal suspicion about most of the staff individually (hmphs for a range of reasons) better you than me - good idea! go for it - there are links to a whole world of books that have come and gone that could keep my brain racked for weeks :) SatuSuro 04:52, 21 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Fitzgerald, Criena.
 * Title 	1935-2005 : celebrating seventy years of university publishing.
 * Published 	2004.
 * Summary 	A brief history of the beginning of the Press in 1948 as the Press and prior to this as *The University Text Book Board.
 * Subject 	University of Western Australia Press -- History.
 * Found in 	In print (Nedlands, W.A.), Summer 2004, p.2,

SatuSuro 04:54, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Eddie McGuire
Hi Moondyne, why did you revert the Eddie Maguire edit I did? Ithought Wikipedia was about publishing factual, unbiased articles, unaffected by subjective publicity material which the subject himself/herself puts forward? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.12.238 (talk • contribs)
 * The edit you made was malformed (use the show preview button) and used an unencyclopaedic tone.  It did not improve the article.  &mdash;Moondyne 06:54, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Saw your effort to improve the Eddie MCGuire article, following an edit by an IP adress user. You said it was unencylopedic, however your edit was a bit messy also so I cleaned it up a little myself. Remember, assume goodwill and check your edits for errors. Thanks, Moondyne - keep up the good work. :-) Tinkstar1985 08:50, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Battle of Pinjarra
Hi Moondyne. What do you now think? Hope this helps. My History of Aboriginal Western Australia is still proceeding. Still needs more entry, so I'll put in your suggestions later. John D. Croft 15:00, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Doc Neeson and Tony Senatore
Hi there, seems like we are still having issues with this user. Can you have a look at some of the recent edits for this article and user and assist with trying to get through to this user to do the right thing. Appreciate your assistance. Thanks! --Mikecraig 03:21, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 21st, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:27, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Crikey
Welcome. I was thinking of it more as a good read than as a good reference. Hesperian 06:47, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Worst
It is so much better as an article - thanks for that! SatuSuro 07:29, 22 May 2007 (UTC) What a relief - I have started inserting history bits please feel free to edit mercilessly if i get too emotional about the old days on the terrace at newspaper house (many a late night walk down the alley to the night watchpersons office for an early edition, and the line of bay trucks lined up around the corner from william street (those days a two way road) ) so beware! SatuSuro 07:50, 22 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Do we get brownie points if we make comment about it? or its rotating direction? SatuSuro 08:10, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Wow - theres secret code in your message - thats what it is? or work has been great today? Henry Kissinger? South China Sea? maybe tierra del fuego?  I give up :| SatuSuro 08:23, 22 May 2007 (UTC)  well that says a lot for him and his attitude to his reading public - thats why I'll stick to the St Georges terrace history days :) thanks for the clarifarction (sic) cheers SatuSuro 08:38, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

?
Whats a fine admin like you doing with blank page like this? Not even blanked by a friendly vandal :) SatuSuro 09:36, 22 May 2007 (UTC) Good idea - good to see things happening SatuSuro 15:05, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

BTW - my copy of Australian Ghost Towns Barry McGowan 2002 ISBN 0-7344-0733-5 has: -
 * Old Halls Creek
 * Cossack
 * Old Onslow
 * Nannine
 * Big Bell
 * Cue
 * Day Dawn
 * Agnew
 * Lawlers
 * Mount Morgans
 * Burtville
 * Malcolm
 * Gwalia
 * Kookynie
 * Niagra
 * Kanowna
 * Kununalling (ok thats one i didnt know about)
 * ora Banda
 * Broad Arrow
 * Menzies
 * Mt Ida ( thas one i didnt know)

But hes a bit daft to have Sarah Island as a ghost town for tassie! cheers SatuSuro 15:11, 22 May 2007 (UTC) And the more I think of it - some group settlement communities - and current wheatbelt towns are getting very close to the category as well - SatuSuro 15:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah its all so fluid - he didnt mention wittenom and even in spet 2001 he was doing his trip it was - but to put abandoned tassie convict settlements in a book like that - nah - SatuSuro 15:20, 22 May 2007 (UTC) He is a historian and heritage consultant specialising in mining history - just as well its a library book :) (due back 29th may) SatuSuro 15:22, 22 May 2007 (UTC)  Foreward by Geoff Blainey and one of the worst writers one liner on the back page :) SatuSuro 15:26, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my userpage, much appreciated. Kindest Regards &mdash; <font color="00DD00">The Sunshine  <font color="00DD00">Man (a.k.a Tellyaddict) 14:52, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting vandalsim on my userpage. :-) War wizard90 21:20, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

The Winstons (australian band)
Will see what I can do about filling in this piece of Western Australian music history - nice to know my work is appreciated Dan arndt 00:59, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * My list was originally an article but various suggestions were made that it be deleted and replaced with suitable categories - which has been done. However there were some bands where no articles existed so rather than lose my list I placed it on my user page - sort of a reference (to do list) - since then when I have the time & inclination I have been creating articles for those notable bands on my list - if you have any suggesations on how else I can achieve this let me know Dan arndt 02:32, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Will wait your musing on this one - meanwhile we do a bit of rersearch on the Winstons Dan arndt 02:54, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

The 25 DYK Medal

 * Hooray for DYKcountitis. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:54, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Number-one albums and singles
Thanks alot! Yeah, I noticed the same thing and I decided to finally re-direct them all to the "number-one" side of things. I'm going to fix all the links to albums and things now. ;) User:Ss112 05:34, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. :) User:Ss112 05:52, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

number 1 singles
Actually - "the number 1 singles" pages were more advanced than the "number-one" singles page I set up. Now I have lost hours of hard work as you have anniliated it! Can you please reinstate the "number 1 singles" as the default? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rusty201 (talk • contribs)
 * Datestamp for archive bot -- 12:57, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Signing posts
As it was written, so it was done. I wonder what tomorrow holds. Hesperian 13:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

specifically
specifically, the "number 1 singles during the 1970s in Australia" page had a lot more work done on it and the "number-one" was an old version I started when I was still learning how to do the wikipedia webpages. Can you get the better version and substitute it for what is there now???? I don't knw hoe do do iit. i did not save a hard copy on my hard drive.

thankk you rusty201
 * Datestamp for archive bot 13:11, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

thank you
Well that's the problem that you created when you copied and pasted the articles into new names. The next person that comes along doesn't necessarily know which is the 'good' version. The lost edits are still there in the the redirect pages edit history, so if you say you'd prefer to keep the "number 1" versions, I'll do a edit history merge. —Moondyne 13:10, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

--- I am sorry - I am new to making pages in wikipedia and I dont understand how all this works, this talk is also new to me. All the pages that were origianlly "number 1 singles " & "number 1 albums" were the most up-to date versions. thank you

rusty201
 * Datestamp for archive bot. 13:15, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

thanks
thanks for making these changes back to the better versions and thank you for alerting me to the change in the first place, it was very kind of you. I'm new to building wikipedia pages, and I find those "wikipedia guidelines" pages a bit voluminous to wade through.

I hope you enjoy the charts pages. I added the graphics to give it a bit more colour. I also have the info for the singles of the 50s & 40s, but dunno if I'm so keen to put those in as well! I've also added the info for all the "compilation" albums that were No 1 during the 80s in Australia. I've got the 2 Kent Music Report books that go up to 1992.

What do you think about changing the "80s singles" page to the table format I've used with graphics, but keeping the editorial comments that were added? I don't know who to appraoch about that as I dont know who made it originally and I don't want to ruin someone elses hard work.

best, rusty201 in Sydney I hope this works with the four tildes: Rusty201 13:32, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

pages
Yep, the signature worked fine. Well done! I agree re changing the eighties page into table format like the seventies. (We really appreciate your hard work by the way - please keep it up). Do you still want me to merge the other decades singles articles, or was it only the seventies one that needed doing? —Moondyne 13:37, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Hi Moondyne

there were 5 basic ideas for pages that I did:

List_of_number_1_singles_in_Australia_during_the_1960s List_of_number_1_singles_in_Australia_during_the_1970s List_of_number_1_albums_in_Australia_during_the_1960s List_of_number_1_albums_in_Australia_during_the_1970s List_of_number_1_albums_in_Australia_during_the_1980s

the best versions of ALL of these were the ones with the "number 1" in the titles. I should have deleted any "number-one" versions, but as a newcomer didn't know the etiquette. I think there were "number-one" old versions for the 2 singles ones and perhaps there were for one or two of the albums ones as well, could you check please? Thanks for reinstating the better versions

I got the table idea from the NZ number 1 chart lists. I thought the UK version (which has been used for the 80s) a bit bland. I'd be happy to re-do tables for the 80s number 1 singles with graphics, however, with permission from whoever put the original data on there. Do you know who I should approach? I've reused the templates from previous years, for years with a similar month/date numbering (except for one or two leap years)

regards rusty201 Rusty201 13:51, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

"better versions"
When I say "better versions" - there were more links in there and I also cleaned up some of the links in the tables that didnt work in the orginal versions - even though they might look very similar. You'll know the latest versions by the fact that there were a large swag of links down the bottom to all the other Australian number one singles and albums lists under "see also" - i note for example that the 60s singles dont have that at the moment.

Pls pass any relevant info on to User:Ss112. I feel a bit helpless in that I dont know how to reinstate the versions and do the work myself, to save you the hassle. cheers Rusty201 14:06, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

images
Before you get too far advanced, you need to understand the deal here with images. Wikipedia is quite strict on only allowing free, or public domain images to be used in Wikipedia articles. In some cases, a 'fair use' claim can be made. In the case of music album covers, these are under copyright and are not free. You therefore need to tag each and every image you upload with a special tag AND add a fair use rationale AND declare the source of the image. If you don't do this the image will be deleted in due course. I see most of the images have been already tagged as likely deletion targets. I suggest you read Wikipedia:Non-free content for some guidance. I'm happy to help explain more if needed. You've uploaded a bundle of images so far [1] (which is great by the way, but you must now go back and sort out tagging as explained above. If you decide that you've uploaded an image which you don't want or need, let me know and I can delete it for you. —Moondyne 14:10, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

I am not sure what exactly to fill in as "fair usage" for each item, is taht the "drop down menu" with "single or album cover"....which I've filled in in most cases. I also don't want to have to reload all those images again- it took hours and hours. I was also not able to find out how to edit the details for the images I have uploaded, which is why i have uploaded several versions of some images in some cases after i got a message saying "you have not identified the source" - when I forgot to choose "single or album cover" in the drop down menu - is that what you mean when you say "fair usage"?.....this is all so confusing. I have declared the sources of the images - they are scans from record and singles covers from my collection in most cases, photos in some others. In some cases, they were already uploaded to wikipedia by other users. I don't want to delete any images: as there should be 5 images for each year of the chart in the singles and 6 for each year in the album charts, to give them some colour. I notice that many album profiles have photos of album covers and these have not been deleted. The legalese on the wikipedia guide pages just baffle users i think... How do I go back and tag images without having to upload them again? Can YOU be a fair use reviewer to these images? Again, I note that other similar album & single cover images are widely used throughout wikipedia. Please advise me if I need to fill anything in and what i need to write. Which ones are going to be deleted? What do I need to fill in, how, and where, without having to re-upload them all.

I'd hate to find them all deleted one day, it was a lot of work! This is all very confusing!

Rusty201 15:00, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

fair usage descriptions
Thanks for the above.

Can you please check that I have done this correctly - I have amended the info here (copied from the Flaming Pie.jpg template you suggested) with one image I uploaded:

If this is acceptable, I will use it as a template for all the other images I uploaded. Where can I find a list of all images I have uploaded, without having to wade through all the other edits I've done?

You will see that I have amended many other pages to add links to albums or singles that I have included, or added images, or to encourage others to write a page about a particular single that was number one in Australia etc.

Rusty201 21:48, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

undeletion
can you please undelete these and I will get onto them today. Can you also somehow let me know which ones they are so I can attend to them?

Thanks for the other info Rusty201 02:10, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

thanks
thanks moondyne, I am starting on them now

Rusty201 02:21, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

photos
all photos should be copyrighted and tagged now. I may get onto reformatting the 1980s #1 singles as a table in the next week or two, but leave editorial content there. cheers

Rusty201 05:49, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Copy
I am sure I have a copy of Go set - somewhere in the cubic metres of paper here. Interesting I think Frazer deserves an article. Also evern more interesting the National LIbrary catalogue has the entry on go set with a start date but no finishing date (ie no mention of 1974) - and that is very unusual for the NLA. SatuSuro 15:18, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Sneaky buggers - the entry is deceptive - they have no ceasing date in the top lines - but in a lower line - they say library has copies - to Aug 3 1974. My mistake... SatuSuro 15:22, 25 May 2007 (UTC)


 * My shared flat in vaucluse in 197- whatever had white ants and they ate through the middle !@!! of my collection of digger, nation review, and other really obscure newsprint SatuSuro 15:29, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Kent Music Report & Go-Set
Hi Moondyne / Sean

I see there's been some discussion on the dates for Kent music report & Go-Set dates.

I am working togehter with david Kent who is supplying me with charts for a radio show I do: http://au.geocities.com/itstimecharts/index.html

He began publishing his charts in 1974, that is true. Much later, he began to work retrospectively from 1974 back to the 1940s with archival charts from various Australian states to create retrospective Kent Music Report National Charts. These are the ones used for his book AUSTRALIAN CHART BOOK: http://www.austchartbook.com.au/ This is the source of all the number one info that I have posted. I am happy to email you jpgs of the Number one info scanned from David Kent's chart books if you give me an email address, if you'd like to sort out confusion re dates.

I have also studied Go-Set for a long time. I made a doco for ABC Radio National in 2000 on the history of Go-Set and interviewed Philip Frazer (he is now in NYC) down the line for the doco. I got permission from Ed Nimmervoll, the chart compiler to put the Go-Set charts (1966-74) online here: http://www.poparchives.com.au/gosetcharts/ It took a long time to make that website. Go Set began publication in Feb 1966. there was no national chart when it began. the Go-Set Australian national chart began in OCTOBER 1966. Go-Set ceased publication on Aug 24 1974. That was the last chart published. NLA only holds copies from 1967-Aug 3 1974 in hard copy. Microfilm copies (origianlly from State Libray of Victoria) go from Feb 66-Aug 24 74. You'll see a pic of this final edition's cover here: http://www.poparchives.com.au/gosetcharts/1974/19740824.html

Barry Rusty201 10:42, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Date/chart inconsistencies
Hey, Moondyne. I don't know if you've noticed (I hope I didn't sound rude saying that), but I've discovered that there is (at times, relatively serious) inconsistencies in chart issue dates. Firstly, I don't even know when the Kent Music Report was first issued. It says on the OzNet Music Chart site that the first Kent Report #1 was "Suspicious Minds" by Elvis Presley, which was in January 1970, and then the Wikipedia article states that the first Report was issued in 1974 (although I noticed that it says that it was "first released on a commercial basis in July 1974"). Secondly, it seems that although the Kent Report was first established in the 70s, the Australian Chart Books David Kent has compiled dates back to the #1s from the 40s! Could you help explain this to me as it's all very weird (hope I don't sound like a WikiNewb). Thirdly, I recently learned that Rusty201 possesses these chart books and has filled the information in according to those. I also notice that the issue dates (as I mentioned before) are inconsistent. On the link to OzNet I provided earlier, it shows that "Suspicious Minds" spent 3 weeks at #1 in 1970, but obviously in the Australian Chart Books it shows that it spent 2 weeks at #1 in 1970 and 1 week in 1969 at #1. Which source is right? I notice that sites like Australian-Charts.com are a week ahead for the charts they supply, is this perhaps what is happening with OzNet? I have also recently noticed that there are weeks spent at #1 inconsistencies, such as "Hey Jude" by the Beatles. In the information that Rusty201 supplied, he wrote that it spent 13 weeks at #1 while on the ARIA Charts article it says it spent 15 weeks on the top spot, which obviously comes from the information OzNet has supplied. The same with "Money, Money, Money" by ABBA in 1976 (Rusty201's info from the chart books shows that it spent 6 weeks, while on OzNet it shows 5 weeks). I hope I'm not shifting a problem and I'm sorry for the long message, but I hope you could help clear it up with me - I'm trying to make sense of it all... Thanks if you can help. User:Ss112 08:30, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi Sean, I'll reply here to keep a centralised discussion else I may get even more confused that I already am. I did write the Kent Music Report article and most of that came from the Daniel Lowe website  (Lowe apparently worked for Kent between '89 and '95 (Australian Music Report) ).  One of the things I did notice in writing the article is that it was unclear exactly when the chart started - It did say it went commercial in July 1974 but was silent on the exact start date, so I said "early 1970's" to hedge my bets.  The OZNET music chart website says the 1st Kent Report was January 1970 but, but based on your other comments about inconsistencies between that and other sources, you have to wonder.  I certainly know no more about this than you but am inclined to leave the article unchanged until a more reliable source can be found.  Its important that we don't perpetuate mistakes (just stating the obvious!) &mdash;Moondyne 11:41, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Hi Moondyne,

I actually spoke to David Kent about the entry for the Kent Music report on wikipedia about 6 months ago, and he said that he was interested in possibly contributing something. You might like to invite him to do so at: davidkent@austchartbook.com.au Or at least ask him to check over what is written and see if he agrees with it. From having seen his charts first hand, I think the first chart was in May 1974. I remember that Tubular Bells was the number 1 album of the week. As mentioned, everything previous to that was "retro-calculated" in the 1990s, when he published his AUSTRALIAN CHART BOOK (1970-92), which begings in Jan 1970. This is why some sources say that his charts started in Jan 1970, as this is when that book starts. He subsequently published another book AUSTRALIAN CHART BOOK (1940-1969) which retrocalculated charts for that period. His album charts started in 1965, as nothing was available before then from any radio stations in Australia in terms of album charts. Rusty201 13:01, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I hope I didn't sound too argumentative and one-sided with you against Rusty - that wasn't my intention - I just thought that since you were talking about moving the pages to "number-one", that was how you wanted it. User:Ss112 06:12, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

names of #1 singles
Hi Sean

thanks for your message. I created a version called "number-one singles" to start off with for the 70s and then thought that "number 1 singles" was probably a better name. So there were 2 versions from the start. I was not sure if I also made other versions of the other work I did (1960s singles, 1960s albums, 1970s albums and 1980s albums) also named "number-one". As I was working on the "number 1" versions in all cases as the most up to date and can't remember if I kept on updating any "number-one" verions as I went along, this is why I panicked. I may have included or altered links along the way, which never made it onto the old versions.

I have discussed with Moondyne making a version of the List_of_number-one_singles_in_Australia_during_the_1980s as a table format (as with 1960s & 1970s versions I made) - keeping the editorial commentary already there on the page, which I'll start work on tonight. I did not know however if the original creator of the page would be too happy about having his/her page modified, and if it should be a seperete page altogether? Do you know who ceated this page (was it you or Moondyne?), can they be contacted to ask them? I'll forward this to Moondyne as well. cheers

rusty201 in Sydney Rusty201 10:18, 26 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Rusty, The original creator was User:Rossrs. I can't speak for him but would not be too worried as I know him to be a good Wikipedian.  Pages get moved around in Wikipedia all the time and virtually anything you do can be undone.  See WP:OWN.  One of the things we should strive for is consistency in article names, particularly when the article is one of a series.  I personally don't care terribly much whether we use List of number-one singles in Australia during the 1980s or List of Number 1 singles in Australia during the 1980s.  That's why we have redirects.   &mdash;Moondyne 11:56, 26 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Rusty, I can speak for User:Rossrs and I say, go ahead and do what you consider best. Like Moondyne, I don't have a preference for how it's done and I think consistency is a good thing.  I'm very pleased that someone is looking at the page and thinking of ways of improving it.  (And Moondyne, thank you for your comment.  It's like walking into a room and accidentally overhearing someone say something nice about me.  I've also signed on as an interested party in the music project, although I'm not sure exactly what I can contribute.) Rossrs 14:13, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

wikiproject
Cool, I've added my name. My speciality lies in charts up til the 1990s. Rusty201 12:45, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

profile
profile is up now, now lets hope that ASIO or the CIA don't look! lol Rusty201 13:36, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

hold on
I never attempted to repost anything! i was just asking a question and i cant see how that could have been misinterpreted as attempting to repost something! And as far as i know, i only recieved one warning!

. I was only warned by 3 editors fyi!

.. and as for the link to the slander and libel page, as far as i know i live in a free world and one of the things about living in the free world is the right to freedom of speech. And i can appreciate how i could have been misinterpreted if i had posted it on the main page. But I posted it in the discussion section where i was hoping to find anyone who had similar views to me about it. Because I am one of the people who are in the same year group as the people involved in the Strippergate incident and we were all told not to tell anyone what happened under penalty of suspension.

But as i am well aware, that last sentence could be misinterpreted.

But know this, I don't have any negative feelings to you as a person/user and that I don't know why you are getting so worked up about it

So as far as i am concerned, do what you want.

Because in my opinion, letting 10 guilty me go free is better than seeing 1 innocent punished -> Quote from NCIS or Numb3rs, i dont really care

And in the long run, being blocked from Wikipedia isn't the end of the world --Willkca 09:04, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

wikiproject
Hi, thanks for inviting to join the project! BrianFG 03:17, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 * ditto - have put my name on the list Dan arndt 00:47, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Would you mind?
Hello, I just thought I'd ask you if you would approve if I began reviewing Good article candidates again, now you know I was an experienced use as Tellyaddict and under this account I know about 1,700 edits &mdash; so just wondering what you think. Regards &mdash; <font color="00DD00">The Sunshine  <font color="00DD00">Man 13:12, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Same to you, happy editing! <b style="color:#2E82F4;">The Sunshine</b> <b style="color:#2E82F4;">Man</b> 16:00, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Names
Ha... we're both running around rechristening ourselves :D (OK, well maybe not running around in your case, but yeah...) Mine was motivated by genuine confusion on someone's part in an email to me, they got the impression I was taking credit for something that wasn't quite my work... Orderinchaos 02:23, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Oz Maritime college
Im off now -if you are staying up for a bit - if it returns could you plese? SatuSuro 15:59, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Kent Music request
Great page you made for the Kent Music Report :). I was wondering if you had the book Australian Chart Book 1970-1992. If you do, could I please request two singers chart positions? Lillygirl 02:18, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your reply and your help with the images. It also sounds interesting about the proposal for Australian Music. Lillygirl 04:15, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

LOL!
Swamp tortoises? They're certainly getting more creative... Orderinchaos 05:54, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm tempted to put it on BJAODN. Orderinchaos 05:58, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Here is is if anyone is wondering what we're talking about. &mdash;Moondyne 06:00, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Ii did have references, so maybe it did happen Gnangarra 06:08, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Speaking of bored schoolkids - hmm - bit sad that one of Perth's most notable state high schools is in such a poor state of repair. Orderinchaos 17:02, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Dont worry now that the ed dept has set all high school students 20hours community service to graduate like the private schools already do we'll have lots of the too hard to let loose in public arena doing CS here instead. Gnangarra 17:15, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Go-Set
Hi Moondyne. I had a few problems editing the Go-Set page today, due to memory problems with my browser, i suspect. I hope that all has been retored now. Apologies.

I note that the Go-Set page states that it has no source. Can the following be referenced as sources for the article?
 * Milesago articles about Go-Set and Frazer's other publications
 * David M Kent's article on Go-Set magazine
 * Jeffery Turnbull's article: MELBOURNE MUSIC IN PRINT – Go-Set Magazine, from forthcoming book "THE WHOLE FRUGGIN’ SCENE, MELBOURNE AND THE ROCK ‘N’ ROLL REVOLUTION – 1964 TO 1976"

all the info should be in there.

You may also wish to amend the link in from Go-set to Go-Set - that being the new category I have just added. Is it appropriate to put a link to the Go-Set charts site in the newly added Go-Set section, or is that considered "advertising"? cheers Barry Rusty201 08:49, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 28th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:39, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Quiz
Tell me you are at a quiz night, youre thw inning table, and youre using a g3 mobile, and if i dont answer in 2 mins you lose the tie breaker? SatuSuro 13:56, 29 May 2007 (UTC) What a loose woman that henrietta is she is so easy with her facts - http://henrietta.liswa.wa.gov.au/search/X?SEARCH=perth+hamburger+&searchscope=1&Da=&Db=&p=&SORT=A - anytime mate - just remember henrietta helps so freely and easily - she should have laws against her easiness :) SatuSuro 13:58, 29 May 2007 (UTC) email only on that stuff, sorry SatuSuro 14:07, 29 May 2007 (UTC) after so many reverts in odd places its always great to find this Grief it is such a humorous relief its like meeting the dwarf inside the atm and realising he is there after all :) SatuSuro 14:17, 29 May 2007 (UTC) In the last resort there is always the User:Durova/The dark side for late night despair SatuSuro 14:28, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

draft version for Australian number 1 singles of 1980s
Hi Moondyne

I have spent several hours constructing a draft illustrated version of the 1980s number 1 singles in Australia in tabular format here User:Rusty201. It also attempts to take into consideration the ARIA Charts / Kent Music Report (Australian Music Report) conflict of the late 1980s, and I explain the dates conflict that Ss112 referred to. I have also (except for a few small things in the original data I am yet to add) kept the editorial content of the original page List_of_number-one_singles_in_Australia_during_the_1980s, the original page of which has not been deleted. I have also added Australian Music Report data for 1988/89, which was not in the original page.

I have put it on my profile as a draft, so that various people can look at it first as a proposal for inclusion on the List_of_number-one_singles_in_Australia_during_the_1980s page. i anticipate there would be a great hue and cry if I were to, unannounced, replace what is now there with what I have created. Can there be a link to my user profile page put on List_of_number-one_singles_in_Australia_during_the_1980s so there can be 'consultation with the public' as to its possible replacement of what is there now? What is the wikipedia protocol for this? Do I go back through the page history and contact every person who has worked on this page? regards Rusty201 03:23, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

List of number-one singles in Australia during the 1990s
Hi, you prodded that article. I quite agree with his deletion, but it seems the page is linked to a a lot of pages. I think it might be a better idea to bring it to a broader audience, maybe an AfD? -- lucasbfr <sup style="color:darkblue;">talk 13:30, 31 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I assume that you meant List of number-one albums (Australia). But I see its been deleted now so the point is moot. &mdash;Moondyne 12:43, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Woops indeed... I left the prod on purpose in case an other admin wanted to take care of it :) -- lucasbfr <sup style="color:darkblue;">talk 12:50, 1 June 2007 (UTC)