User talk:Moontrinemars

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! The Anonymouse (talk • contribs) 06:50, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 04:17, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Deena Metzger, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Basket Feudalist 14:01, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Sara Hershkowitz
The last version is pretty useless, but I won't revert back. Please clean up yourself. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:42, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Saying more clearly what I meant: when you think to do an artist a favour by removing her birth year, you also need to replace the category for that birth year, by the category for people with year of birth missing, or you achieved nothing. As long as published sources have the birth day, why would you try to that? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:59, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, I saw only you revert and meant that. - You added details, but I reverted because none of them had an independent source. A subject's website is not independent. With a source, you can add the items, but please read a few articles and watch out for language that is not encyclopedic, such as "In recent years she has become known for her daring performances and for her virtuosity as a coloratura soprano.", - in detail: "recent" is a no-no word because it will be wrong soon, "daring performances" is POV (point of view); if some notable critic says so, you can quote him or her, and "virtuosity as a coloratura soprano", - really: show me one coloratura soprano without virtuosity ;) - She shows a lot, both in the Strauss lieder that I heard as in the Ligeti stunt, but it goes without saying. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:36, 16 May 2019 (UTC)